Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 25, 2018

A conversation analytic study of error correction outside of the second language classroom

  • Virginia David EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

This study investigates repair sequences between two nonnative speakers of English while they engaged in naturally occurring talk outside of the second language classroom. Eight hours of naturally occurring talk between native and nonnative speakers were collected and analyzed. The present study reports on one hour of the data which shows two types of repair: Self-initiated and other-corrected and other-initiated. The analysis of the repair sequences shows that the self-initiated and other-corrected repair sequences follow a distinct pattern of asking for confirmation on the production of a language item and receiving a correction, while the other-initiated repair is done differently from the ones found in the literature on repair and do not follow the rules of preference for self-correction described by some researchers in the Conversation Analysis literature. In addition, the other-initiated repair analyzed in this study does not appear to be modulated, that is, the person initiating the correction does not offer a candidate solution by asking a question and displaying uncertainty, as researchers found. The repair sequences show a particularly interesting expert-novice relationship in which one nonnative speaker relies on a more expert nonnative speaker to communicate with a native English speaker.

References

Gaskill, William. 1980. Correction in native speaker-nonnative speaker conversation. In D. Larsen-Freeman (ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research, 125–137. Rowley, MS: Newbury.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1983. Searching for a word as an interactive activity. in J. N. Deely & M. D. Lenhart (eds.), Semiotics, 129–138. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4615-9328-7_13Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Charles Goodwin. 1986. Gestures and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62. 51–75.10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51Search in Google Scholar

Hosoda, Yuri. 2000. Other-repair in Japanese conversations between nonnative and native speakers. Issues in Applied Linguistics 11(1). 39–63.10.5070/L4111005023Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1973. A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 9. 47–96.10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47Search in Google Scholar

Koshik, Irene. 2005a. Alternative questions used in conversational repair. Discourse Studies 7(2). 193–211.10.1177/1461445605050366Search in Google Scholar

Koshik, Irene. 2005b. Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.16Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 2000. When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21(2). 205–243.10.1093/applin/21.2.205Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A., Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2). 361–382.10.1353/lan.1977.0041Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A., Irene Koshik, Sally Jacoby & David Olsher. 2002. Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22. 3–31.10.1017/S0267190502000016Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A. & Harvey. Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8. 289–327.10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-4-25
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0167/html
Scroll to top button