Abstract
This paper is concerned with selecting an appropriate perspective from which to understand and evaluate social-decision procedures. Distinguishing between “agentrationality” and “option-rationality”, the author argues that a rational agent may choose a social-decision procedure that is not itself agent-rational (but merely option-rational). The argument puts the voter's paradox in a context allowing evaluation of (a) its general import and (b) practical proposals for avoiding it in particular cases. Arrow's four conditions for a social-decision procedure are shown to have little relevance to the understanding or evaluation of constitutions. The author concludes that the more fruitful perspective for discussing social-decision procedures is that of option-rationality rather than (as Arrow, Wolff, and others have supposed) that of agent-rationality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, M. Avoiding the voter's paradox democratically. Theor Decis 5, 295–311 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164721
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164721