Abstract
In this paper, I attempt to argue alongside Clayton Crockett that Timothy Morton’s hyperobjects can be extended to encompass every object, not merely those that are large in comparison to human beings. However, unlike Crockett who uses the works of Derrida and Lacan to achieve this goal, I turn to Husserl’s underdeveloped theory of hyletic phenomenology and hyle. Despite Husserl’s articulation of hyletic phenomenology ending as quickly as it is announced, I argue that three lessons can be learned from what Husserl does have to say about hyle. Specifically, hyle is non-intentional, it is co-constitutive of intentionality, and hyle contains the possibility of broadening our traditional understanding of objects. Taken together, I suggest that Husserl’s understanding of hyle caries considerable overlap with both Crockett and Morton’s understanding of hyperobjects.
References
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. USA: Duke University Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Brassier, Ray. Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.10.1057/9780230590823Search in Google Scholar
Crockett, Clayton. Derrida after the End of Writing: Political Theology and New Materialism. New York: Fordham University Press, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Gift of Death & Literature in Secret. 2nd Ed. Translated by David Wills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.10.7208/chicago/9780226571676.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. USA: Open Court Publishing Company, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. USA: Open Court Publishing Company, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the Making. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. The Essential Husserl: Basic Writings in Transcendental Phenomenology. Edited by Donn Welton. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson. New York: Routledge Classics, 2012.10.4324/9780203120330Search in Google Scholar
McKenna, William. Husserl’s “Introductions to Phenomenology:” Interpretation and Critique. USA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982.10.1007/978-94-009-7573-6Search in Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Translated by Ray Brassier. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. USA: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Sparrow, Tom. The End of Phenomenology: Metaphysics and New Realism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.10.1515/9780748684847Search in Google Scholar
Whitehead, Patrick. “Phenomenology without correlationism: Husserl’s hyletic material.” Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology. 15:2 (October 2015), 1-12.10.1080/20797222.2015.1101830Search in Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. “The end of what? Phenomenology vs. speculative realism.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 24:3 (2016), 289-309.10.1080/09672559.2016.1175101Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Seth Daves, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.