Abstract
This paper attempts to outline briefly a case for philosophers' critical attention to one's work, even when, indeed especially when, that attention is a line-by-line analysis of a single paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davson-Galle, P.: 1990a, ‘Interpreting Arguments and Judging Issues’, Informal Logic 21, 41–45.
Davson-Galle, P.: 1990b, ‘Applied Ethics and Metaphilosophy’, Philosophy in Context 20, 37–52.
Glasersfeld, von E.: 1989, ‘Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching’, Synthese 80(1), 121–140.
Matthews, M. & Davson-Galle, P.: 1992, ‘Constructivism & Science Education: Some Cautions and Comments’, in S. Hills (ed.), History & Philosophy of Science & Science Education (Vol. II), Queen's University, Kingston, 121–134.
Sutching, W.: 1992, ‘Constructivism Deconstructed’, Science & Education 1(3), 223–254.
Vicentini, M.: 1992, ‘Constructivism’, Science & Education 1(4), 395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davson-Galle, P. Philosophical criticism: Its nature and function. Sci Educ 3, 311–315 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540159
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540159