Abstract
I review and reconsider some of the themes of ‘Two notions of necessity’ (Daviesand Humberstone, 1980) and attempt to reach a deeper understanding and appreciation of Gareth Evans's reflections (in ‘Reference and contingency’, 1979) on both modality and reference. My aim is to plot the relationships between the notions of necessity that Humberstone and I characterised in terms of operators in two-dimensional modal logic, the notions of superficial and deep necessity that Evans himself described, and the epistemic notion of a priority.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baldwin, T. (2001): ‘On Considering a Possible World as Actual’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75, 157–174.
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983): Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burge, T. (1988): ‘Individualism and Self-Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 85, 649–663.
Burge, T. (1993): ‘Content Preservation’, Philosophical Review 102, 457–488.
Chalmers, D.J. (1996): The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D.J. (2004): ‘The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics’, in M. García-Carpintero and J. Macià (eds.), The Two-Dimensional Framework, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crossley, J.N. and Humberstone, I.L. (1977): ‘The Logic of “Actually”’, Reports on Mathematical Logic 8, 11–29.
Davies, M. (1981): Meaning, Quantification, Necessity: Themes in Philosophical Logic, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Davies, M. (1983): ‘Actuality and Context Dependence II’, Analysis 43, 128–133.
Davies, M. and Humberstone, I.L. (1980): ‘Two Notions of Necessity’, Philosophical Studies 38, 1–30.
Donnellan, K.S. (1977): ‘The Contingent A priori and Rigid Designators’, in P.A. French, T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2: Studies in the Philosophy of Language (pp. 12–27), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Evans, G. (1979): ‘Reference and Contingency’, The Monist 62, 161–189. Reprinted in (1985): Collected Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 178–213. Page references to reprinting.
Evans, G. (1982): The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, G. (1985): ‘Does Tense Logic Rest upon a Mistake’, in Collected Papers (pp. 343–363), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Field, H. (1996): ‘The Aprioricity of Logic’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96, 359–379.
Forbes, G. (1983): ‘Actuality and Context Dependence I’, Analysis 43, 123–128.
Forbes, G. (1989): Languages of Possibility: An Essay in Philosophical Logic, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Frege, G. (1892): ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung (translated as “On Sense and Reference”)’, in P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78), Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1952.
Hazen, A. (1976): ‘Expressive Completeness in Modal Languages’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5, 25–46.
Jackson, F.C. (1998a): From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, F.C. (1998b): ‘Reference and Description Revisited’, in J.E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 12: Language, Mind, and Ontology, (pp. 201–218). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Kaplan, D. (1989): ‘Demonstratives’, in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kroon, F. (1987): ‘Causal Descriptivism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65, 1–17.
Kripke, S.A. (1980): Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, D. (1980): ‘Index, Context, and Content’, in S. Kanger and S. Öhman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar (pp. 79–100), Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in (1998): Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–44. Page references to reprinting.
Peacocke, C. (2004): The Realm of Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pryor, J. (2000): ‘The Skeptic and the Dogmatist’, Noûs 34, 517–49.
Soames, S. (2002): Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R.C. (2001): ‘On Considering a Possible World as Actual’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75, 141–156.
Stalnaker, R.C. (2003): ‘Conceptual Truth and Metaphysical Necessity’, in Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Essays (pp. 201–215), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, B. (1976): ‘States of Affairs’, in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics (pp. 263–284), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, B. (1985): Modes of Occurrence, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, M. Reference, Contingency, and the Two-Dimensional Framework. Philosophical Studies 118, 83–131 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000019544.39800.50
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000019544.39800.50