Skip to main content
Log in

Reference, Contingency, and the Two-Dimensional Framework

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I review and reconsider some of the themes of ‘Two notions of necessity’ (Daviesand Humberstone, 1980) and attempt to reach a deeper understanding and appreciation of Gareth Evans's reflections (in ‘Reference and contingency’, 1979) on both modality and reference. My aim is to plot the relationships between the notions of necessity that Humberstone and I characterised in terms of operators in two-dimensional modal logic, the notions of superficial and deep necessity that Evans himself described, and the epistemic notion of a priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baldwin, T. (2001): ‘On Considering a Possible World as Actual’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75, 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983): Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1988): ‘Individualism and Self-Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 85, 649–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1993): ‘Content Preservation’, Philosophical Review 102, 457–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.J. (1996): The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.J. (2004): ‘The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics’, in M. García-Carpintero and J. Macià (eds.), The Two-Dimensional Framework, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, J.N. and Humberstone, I.L. (1977): ‘The Logic of “Actually”’, Reports on Mathematical Logic 8, 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (1981): Meaning, Quantification, Necessity: Themes in Philosophical Logic, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (1983): ‘Actuality and Context Dependence II’, Analysis 43, 128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. and Humberstone, I.L. (1980): ‘Two Notions of Necessity’, Philosophical Studies 38, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K.S. (1977): ‘The Contingent A priori and Rigid Designators’, in P.A. French, T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2: Studies in the Philosophy of Language (pp. 12–27), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1979): ‘Reference and Contingency’, The Monist 62, 161–189. Reprinted in (1985): Collected Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 178–213. Page references to reprinting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982): The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1985): ‘Does Tense Logic Rest upon a Mistake’, in Collected Papers (pp. 343–363), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H. (1996): ‘The Aprioricity of Logic’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96, 359–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. (1983): ‘Actuality and Context Dependence I’, Analysis 43, 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. (1989): Languages of Possibility: An Essay in Philosophical Logic, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1892): ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung (translated as “On Sense and Reference”)’, in P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78), Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, A. (1976): ‘Expressive Completeness in Modal Languages’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5, 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F.C. (1998a): From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F.C. (1998b): ‘Reference and Description Revisited’, in J.E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 12: Language, Mind, and Ontology, (pp. 201–218). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (1989): ‘Demonstratives’, in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, F. (1987): ‘Causal Descriptivism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.A. (1980): Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1980): ‘Index, Context, and Content’, in S. Kanger and S. Öhman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar (pp. 79–100), Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in (1998): Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–44. Page references to reprinting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C. (2004): The Realm of Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. (2000): ‘The Skeptic and the Dogmatist’, Noûs 34, 517–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. (2002): Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.C. (2001): ‘On Considering a Possible World as Actual’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75, 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.C. (2003): ‘Conceptual Truth and Metaphysical Necessity’, in Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Essays (pp. 201–215), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (1976): ‘States of Affairs’, in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics (pp. 263–284), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (1985): Modes of Occurrence, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, M. Reference, Contingency, and the Two-Dimensional Framework. Philosophical Studies 118, 83–131 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000019544.39800.50

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000019544.39800.50

Keywords

Navigation