Abstract
From Peirce, a sign represents something other than itself, an object, for some third; from Deleuze, a sign can create and erase an object, for some third. He makes this claim in the cinema books, without detailed explication. It is a fleeting reference to the Peircean triad developed in his semiotics; moreover, references to “objects” in Deleuze’s discussions of signs in his other work are often generic. In this essay, I explain what it means in Deleuze’s semiotics for a sign to create and erase its object. My method is to use the perspective of the object in the semiotic triad to compare Deleuze and Peirce’s semiotics. Deleuze’s sign that creates and erases its object marks a clear departure from Peirce’s semiotics. For Deleuze, like Peirce, an acquaintance with the object independent of the action of the sign is necessary for semiotics. Of most significance is that for Peirce, thinking with signs necessarily involves modifying prior knowledge of the object – meaning one’s conception of the object is a version of what was already known; while for Deleuze, thinking with signs can involve producing ideas at a second remove from the object – in turn, creating and erasing new object(s). Ultimately, this essay contributes to research on Deleuze’s cinema books by undertaking a detailed reading of a part of his discussion that has not been analyzed. Furthermore, in producing Deleuze’s concept of a sign that creates and erases its object, this essay reminds us how we think – and could think – with signs, reaffirming the importance of semiotic analysis for discussion about thinking with signs. Finally, this essay contributes to scholarship on Deleuze’s and Peirce’s semiotics.
References
Atkin, Albert. 2013. Peirce’s theory of signs. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics/ (accessed 15 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Baines, Paul. 2006. The primacy of semiosis: An ontology of relation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442682139Search in Google Scholar
Bogue, Donald. 2003. Deleuze on cinema. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203826065Search in Google Scholar
Clisby, Dale. 2015. Deleuze’s secret dualism? Competing accounts of the relationship between the virtual and the actual. Parrhesia 24. 127–149.Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2015. The semiotics of mass media. In Peter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 482–502. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_20Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 2015. Semiotics “today”: The twentieth-century founding and twenty-first-century prospects. In Peter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 29–113. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_2Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2: The time-image, Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1990. Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. New York: Zone.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and repetition, Paul Patton (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 2003. Proust and signs: The complete text, Richard Howard (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 2004. How do we recognise structuralism? In David Lapoujade (ed.), Desert islands and other texts (Semiotext(e) Foreign Agents Series), 170–192. Cambridge: MIT.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles & Felix Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, Brian Massumi (trans.). Minnesota: Minnesota University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gangle, Rocco. 2015. Diagrammatic immanence: Category theory and philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474404181Search in Google Scholar
Jappy, Tony. 2013. Introduction to Peircean visual semiotics. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Lane, Robert. 2018. Peirce on realism and idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108231657Search in Google Scholar
Liszka, James Jakob. 1996. A general introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles S. Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lorraine, Tamsin. 2011. Deleuze and Guattari’s immanent ethics. New York: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. 2002a. Introduction: Like a thought. In Brian Massumi (ed.), A shock to thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari, xiii–xxxix. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. 2002b. Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822383574Search in Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian 2015. Collective expression: A radical pragmatics. Inflexions 8. http://www.inflexions.org/radicalpedagogy/main.html#Massumi (accessed 15 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles & Lady Victoria Welby. 1977. Semiotic and significs, Charles S. Hardwick (ed.). Bloomington: Indianapolis University Press. [Reference to this work will be designated SS followed by page number.].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 8 . C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar
Semetsky, Inna. 2016. Monstrous hermeneutics: Learning from diagrams. Semiotica 212. 239–258.10.1515/sem-2016-0121Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel W. 2007. Deleuze, Kant, and the post-Kantian tradition. Keynote address presented at The strange encounter of Kant and Deleuze, University of Greenwich, 7 July. https://www.academia.edu/17078182/Deleuze_Kant_and_the_Post-Kantian_Tradition (accessed 15 November 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Vellodi, Kamini. 2014. Diagrammatic thought: Two forms of constructivism in C.S. Peirce and Gilles Deleuze. Parrhesia 19. 79–95.Search in Google Scholar
Wark, McKenzie. 2017. General intellects: Twenty-five thinkers for the twenty-first century. New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, James. 2014. Barthes, Deleuze and Peirce: Pragmatism in pursuit of the sign. In Simon Bignall, Sean Bowden & Paul Patton (eds.), Deleuze and pragmatism, 38–54. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
