Abstract
Bradley (Theory Decis 85:5–20, 2018) develops some theory of the linear opinion pool, in apparent contradiction to results of Dawid et al. (Test 4:263–314, 1995). We investigate the sources of these contradictions, and in particular identify a mathematical error in Bradley (2018) that invalidates his main result.
Notes
There are some typos in the formulae here, with \(\alpha _0\) variously rendered as \(a_3\) and \(\alpha _3\).
References
Bradley, R. (2018). Learning from others: conditioning versus averaging. Theory and Decision, 85, 5–20.
Dawid, A. P., DeGroot, M. H., & Mortera, J. (1995). Coherent combination of experts’ opinions (with Discussion). Test, 4, 263–314.
DeGroot, M. H. (1974). Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 118–121.
DeGroot, M. H., & Mortera, J. (1991). Optimal linear opinion pools. Management Science, 37, 546–558.
McConway, K. J. (1981). Marginalization and linear opinion pools. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 410–414.
Stone, M. (1961). The opinion pool. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 1339–1342.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dawid, A.P., Mortera, J. Resolving some contradictions in the theory of linear opinion pools. Theory Decis 88, 453–456 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09729-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09729-0