Skip to main content
Log in

The Queen and the `Bolton Seven'

  • Case Law Studies
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note examines the case of a group of gay men who, having engaged in consensual sexual acts together, became known as the `Bolton Seven' following their conviction in 1998 for offences of buggery and/or gross indecency. More particularly the note scrutinises the implications of the ages of the participants (one of whom, at 17\(\tfrac{1}{2}\), was unable to give lawful consent to sexual intercourse with a man) in the light of the enactment of Part I of the Sex Offenders Act 1997 which introduces a system of compulsory registration by some convicted and cautioned sex offenders with the police (including men convicted of, or cautioned for, buggery or gross indecency). The note explores the justification for inclusion of these offences within the remit of the1997 Act together with the cultural construction of gay men as predatory and as constituting a risk to younger members of society. It also analyses some of the effects of the registration requirement in terms of it constituting a potential violation of fundamental rights such as equality and respect for private life. This discussion is located particularly within the context of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998 in the U.K..

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, K., “Tales of the Community: Sexual Orientation Discrimination and EC Law”, J.S.W.F.L. 20/4 (1998), 455–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, J., “They Gag Women, Don't They?”, in Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body, ed. J. Bridgeman & S. Millns (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1995), 22–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, J., “Criminalising the One Who Really Cared”, Feminist Legal Studies VI/2 (1998), 245-256.

  • Clements, L. & Young, Y. (eds.), “Human Rights: Changing the Culture”, J.L.S. 26 (1999) special edition.

  • Cobley, C., “Keeping Track of Sex Offenders - Part I of the Sex Offenders Act 1997”, M.L.R. 60 (1997), 690–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R., Law, Masculinity and the Family (London: Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicey, A.V., An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th edn. (London: Macmillan, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. & Haggerty, K., Policing the Risk Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, K., “The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy”, M.L.R. 62 (1998), 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D., “The Human Rights Act 1998 and Constitutional Principles”, Legal Studies 19/2 (1999), 165–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, S., “Equality Issues”, in The Impact of the Human Rights Bill on English Law, ed. B.S. Markesinis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S., “The Structure of the Veil”, M.L.R. 52 (1989), 420–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Government, White Paper, Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill, October 1997, Cm 3782.

  • Lacey, N. & Wells, C., Reconstructing Criminal Law (London: Butterworths, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A., “Dicey Dissected: Dominant, Dormant, Displaced”, in Feminist Perspectives on Public Law, ed. S. Millns & N. Whitty (London: Cavendish, 1999), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C.A., “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination”, in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (Cambridge M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1987), 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullender, R., “Privacy, Paedophilia and the European Convention on Human Rights: A Deontological Approach”, P.L. (1998), 384–388.

  • Power, H., “Gay Men and Part 1 of the Sex Offenders Act, 1997”, Web J.C.L.I. 1 (1998), http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/1998/issue1/power1.html.

  • Phillips, A. (ed.), Feminism and Equality (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., “The Rule of Law and its Virtue”, L.Q.R. 93 (1977), 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., “Beyond Equality and Difference: Sexual Difference in the Work of Adriana Cavalero”, Feminist Legal Studies VI/1 (1998), 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohrab, J.A., “Avoiding the ‘Exquisite Trap’: A Critical Look at the Equal Treatment/ Special Treatment Debate in Law”, Feminist Legal Studies I/2 (1993), 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soothill K. & Francis B., “Sexual Reconvictions and the Sex Offenders Act 1997”, N.L.J. 127 (1997), 1285 and 1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stychin, C., Law's Desire: Sexuality and the Limits of Justice (London, Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadham, J. & Mountfield, H., Blackstone's Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998 (Blackstone Press: London, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D., “Fight Grows for Gays in Video Case”, The Guardian (23 January, 1998).

  • Wells, C., “ ‘I Blame the Parents': Fitting New Genes in Old Criminal Laws”, M.L.R. 61 (1998), 724–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dearden, N. The Queen and the `Bolton Seven'. Feminist Legal Studies 7, 317–332 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009218800557

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009218800557

Navigation