Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter highlights the contributions of Joseph J. Schwab to the field of science education through a discussion of some of his most important published work. Schwab began his career on the faculty of the undergraduate college at the University of Chicago in the 1930s at a time when the college was engaged in a radical experiment in general education. Schwab believed that the undergraduate experience should develop an appreciation in students for the modes of thought used in scientific investigation through critical reading of original scientific papers and Socratic discourse with the goal of preparing them for a lifetime of learning and informed decision making. He later brought the lessons learned at Chicago to the 1960s era reform of school science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Schwab preferred “enquiry” to “inquiry,” but in his writing the spelling varies depending on where the work was published. In this chapter, the spelling that actually appeared in a publication will be used, and all my discussions of his work will use the word inquiry.

  2. 2.

    The terms general education and liberal education will be used synonymously in this chapter to describe nonspecialized and nonvocational programs of study that offer students a broad base of experience with various modes of thought and knowledge of their culture.

  3. 3.

    See The Emergence of the American University by Lawrence Veysey (1981) for an extended discussion of the history of the American University during the time period in question.

  4. 4.

    A comparison between Schwab’s and Kuhn’s ideas, especially the implications of those ideas for science teaching, can be found in Kuhn and Schwab on Science Texts and the Goals of Science Education (Siegel 1978).

  5. 5.

    A number of undergraduate colleges in the United States continue to require a common liberal arts core, although the grand experiments of the first half of the twentieth century at places like Chicago for the most part no longer exist.

References

  • AAAS (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1966). The Reforming of General Education: The Columbia Experience in its National Setting. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. & Schwab, J. J. (1965). Practical logic: Problems of ethical decision. American Behavioral Scientist, 8 (8), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G.E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Columbia University Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. (1984). No easy answers: Joseph Schwab’s contribution to curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 14 (2), 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. (1985). Dialogue: The vitality of theory in Schwab’s conception of the practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 15 (1), 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1975). Beyond the Pleasure Principle (J. Strachey, ed. and trans.). New York: W.W. Norton. (Originally published in 1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Committee (1945). General Education in a Free Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. (1961). Biological Education in American Secondary Schools 1890–1960. Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, R. M. (1936). The Higher Learning in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in Classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. (1982). Aspects of the Feminine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing Instructional Objectives. Palo Alto, CA: Fearon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Hartcourt, Brace, & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1941). The role of biology in general education: I. Biology and the problem of values. Bios, 12 (2), 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1949). The nature of scientific knowledge as related to liberal education. Journal of General Education, 3, 245–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J., (1950a). The natural sciences: The three-year program. In The Idea and Practice of General Education: An Account of the College of the University of Chicago, by present and former members of the faculty (pp. 149–186). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1950b). Criteria for the evaluation of achievement tests: From the point of view of the subject-matter specialist, in Proceedings of the Invitational Conference on Testing Problems, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, pp. 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1953). John Dewey: The creature as creative. The Journal of General Education, 7, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J., (1954). Eros and education: A discussion of one aspect of discussion. Journal of General Education, 8, 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J., (1956). Science and Civil Discourse: The uses of diversity. Journal of General Education, 9, 132–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1957). On the corruption of education by psychology. Ethics, 68 (1), 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1959). The “impossible” role of the teacher in progressive education. School Review, 67, 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J., (1960). What do scientists do? Behavioral Science, 5, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1962). The Teaching of Science as Enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1963a). Biology Teachers’ Handbook. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1963b). Editorial comment: A radical departure for a program in the liberal arts. The Journal of General Education, 15 (1), (no page numbers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In G. W. Ford and L. Pugno (Eds.), The Structure of Knowledge and the Curriculum (pp. 6–30). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1969a). College Curriculum and Student Protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1969b). The practical: A language for curriculum. The School Review, 78 (1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1970). The practical: A language for curriculum. Washington, DC: National Education Association, Center for the Study of Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1971). The practical: Arts for eclectic. School Review, 79, 493–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81, 501–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13 (3), 239–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1978). Kuhn and Schwab on science texts and the goals of science education. Educational Theory, 28 (4), 302–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veysey, L. (1981). The Emergence of the American University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I. & Wilkof, N. J. (1978). Introduction. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education. Selected Essays by Joseph J. Schwab (pp. 1–40). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George E. DeBoer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DeBoer, G.E. (2014). Joseph J. Schwab: His Work and His Legacy. In: Matthews, M. (eds) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_76

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics