skip to main content
article

Privacy and Policy for Genetic Research

Published:01 March 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

I begin with a discussion of the value of privacy and what we lose without it. I then turn to the difficulties of preserving privacy for genetic information and other medical records in the face of advanced information technology. I suggest three alternative public policy approaches to the problem of protecting individual privacy and also preserving databases for genetic research: (1) governmental guidelines and centralized databases, (2) corporate self-regulation, and (3) my hybrid approach. None of these are unproblematic; I discuss strengths and drawbacks of each, emphasizing the importance of protecting the privacy of sensitive medical and genetic information as well as letting information technology flourish to aid patient care, public health and scientific research.

References

  1. ACM Policy '98, Renaissance Hotel, Washington D.C., May 10-12, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Barnard. Doctors Brace for Changes in Privacy. The Boston Globe, January 11: A1, A10 & A11, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R.C. Barrows, Jr. and P.D. Clayton. Privacy, Confidentiality, and Electronic Medical Records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 3(2): 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. T. Beauchamp and J. Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Bennett. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Culver, J. Moor, W. Duerfeldt, M. Kapp, and M. Sullivan. Privacy. Professional Ethics, 3 (3 & 4): 4-25, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J.W. DeCew. In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J.W. DeCew. Alternatives for Protecting Privacy While Respecting Patient Care and Public Health Needs. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(4): 249-255, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J.W. DeCew. The Priority of Privacy for Medical Information. Social Philosophy and Policy, 17(2): 213-234, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D.E. Detmer and E.B. Steen, Shoring Up Protection of Personal Health Data. Issues in Science and Technology, 76, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Eilperin. New Rules Planned on Health Privacy. The Boston Globe, December 20: A3, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Foreman. Your Health History-up for Grabs?. The Boston Globe, July 20: C1, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Franklin, editor. Business Guide to Privacy and Data Protection Legislation. Kluwer Law International, Dordrecht, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Gavison. Privacy and the Limits of Law. 89 Yale Law Journal, 421: 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L.O. Gostin. Health Information Privacy. 80 Cornell Law Review 101: 104, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L.O. Gostin Making Tradeoffs Between the Collective Good of Human Health and the Individual Good of Personal Privacy, presented at an international conference, "Electronic Patient Records in Medical Practice," Rotterdam, The Netherlands, October 6, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. Ladine. Medical Privacy Rules are Relaxed. The Boston Globe. August 10: A1 and A5, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Markoff. Europe's Plans to Protect Privacy Worry Business, New York Times, April 11: A1, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R.E. Mitchell and J.W. DeCew. Dynamic Negotiation in the Privacy Wars. Technology Review 97(8): 70-71, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Moor. The Ethics of Privacy Protection. Library Trends 39 (1 & 2): 69-82, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Moor. Towards a Theory of Privacy in the Information Age. Computers and Society, September: 27-32, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Pear. Bush Acts to Drop Core Privacy Rule on Medical Data. The New York Times, March 22: A1 and A22, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Richwine. Privacy Laws for Patients Don't Extend to Internet. The Boston Globe, November 11: 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Rigby, I. Hamilton, and R. Draper. Finding Ethical Principles and Practical Guidelines for the Controlled Flow of Patient Data, Presented at an International Conference, Electronic Patient Records in Medical Practice. Rotterdam, The Netherlands, October 7, 1998a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Rigby, I. Hamilton and R. Draper. Towards an Ethical Protocol in Mental Health Informatics. In B. Cesnick, A.T. McCray, J.-R. Scherrer, editor, MedInfo '98: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Medical Informatics , pp. 1223-1227. Amsterdam, IOS Press, 1998b.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. P.M. Schwartz. European Data Protection Law and Restrictions on International Data Flows, 80 Iowa Law Review 471: 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. L. Tye. EC May Force New Look at Privacy, Boston Globe, September 7: 10, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A. Westin et al. Health Care Information Privacy: A Survey of the Public and Leaders. 23 (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. B. Woodward. Intrusion in the Name of 'Simplification. The Washington Post, August 15, 1996; Medical identifier hearings to begin, The Boston Globe, July 20: A5, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Privacy and Policy for Genetic Research

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access