Skip to main content
Log in

Discourse Theory and Business Ethics. The Case of Bankers' Conceptualizations of Customers

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within discourse theory, language is seen as constitutive of reality. Furthermore, facts and values are viewed as inseparable. This has consequences for business ethics. In this paper the relationship between discourse theory and business ethics is discussed. Both the descriptive and prescriptive aspects of business ethics are taken into account. Furthermore, an example of an empirical study is presented. A discourse analysis is conducted to answer the questions of how bankers in Holland conceptualize and thus treat their customers and whether there are differences between the largest three banks. The article contains the description of five different discourses on customers within the banks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, S. R.: 1980, Political Subjectivity (New Haven, London).

  • Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek: 1998, Gebieden in Nederland, 1998 (Voorburg/Heerlen).

  • Combes, Cherry, David Grant, Tom Keenoy and Cliff Oswick (editors): 2000, Organizational Discourse: Word-views, Work-views and World-views (KMPC, London).

  • Cowton, C. and R. Crisp: 1998 (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

  • Dalen, A. A. and C. J. van Gelderen: 1998, In haar maatschappelijk functioneren is de Rabobank anders! Wens of werkelijkheid? (internal publication).

  • Doig, A. and J. Wilson: 1998, ‘The Effectiveness Of Codes Of Conduct', Business Ethics: A European Review 7, 140–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. and M. L. Clark and G. McKenzie: 1989, ‘Subject and System in International Interaction', International Organization 43, 475–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S.: 1990, Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

  • Dryzek J. S. and J. Berejikian: 1993, ‘Reconstructive Democratic Theory', American Political Science Review 87, 48–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning D. and W. Osuna: 1994, ‘Policy Analysts’ Orientations: An Empirical Investigation Using Q Methodology', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13, 629–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eeten, M. J. G.: 1998, Dialogues of the Deaf: Defining New Agendas for Environmental Deadlocks (Eburon, Delft).

  • Foucault, M., edited by P. Rabinow: 1984, The Foucault Reader (Penguin Books, London).

  • Hackley C. E. and Ph. J. Kitchen: 1999a, ‘Ethical Perspectives on the Postmodern Communications Leviathan', Journal of Business Ethics 20, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackley, C. E.: 1999b, ‘The Meaning of Ethics in and of Advertising', Business Ethics: A European Review 1, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, T.: 1998, ‘Scoring an own Goal? Ethical Issues in the U.K. Professional Soccer Business', Business Ethics: A European Review 1, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M.: 1988, Ethics Management (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljander, V. and T. Stranvik, 1995, ‘The Nature of Customer Relationships in Services', Advances in Services Marketing and Management 4, 141–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L.: 2000, ‘Work-Views and Work-Views: Building Theory About Discourse and Organizations', in C. Combes et al. (ed.), Organizational Discourse: Word-views, Work-views and World-views (KMPC, London), p. 255.

  • Parker, M. (ed.): 1998, Ethics and Organizations (Sage Publications, London).

  • Felkins, P. K. and I. Goldman: 1993, ‘Political Myth as Subjective: Some Interpretations and Understandings of John F. Kennedy', Political Psychology 14, 447–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randels, G. D. Jr.: 1998, ‘The Contingency of Business: Narrative, Metaphor, and Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1299–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E.: 1994, Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice (Duke University Press, Durham NC).

  • Sabatier, P. A.: 1988, ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework Of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-oriented Learning Therein', Policy Sciences 21, 129–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. and J. J. Parkington and V. M. Buxton: 1980, ‘Employee and Customer Perceptions of Service in Banks', Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 252–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. J.: 1988, The Politics of Representation (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison).

  • Shapiro, M. J.: 1992, Reading the Postmodern Polity (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).

  • Sorell, T.: 1998, ‘Beyond the Fringe? The Strange State of Business Ethics', in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics and Organizations (Sage Publications, London), pp. 15–29.

  • Stephenson, W.: 1953, The Study of Behaviour: Qtechnique and Its Methodology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

  • Thomas, D. B. and L. R. Baas: 1992, ‘The Issue of Generalization in Q Methodology: “Reliable Schematics” Revisisted', Operant Subjectivity 16, 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. and C. McCoy and A. McBride: 1993, ‘Deconstructing the Political Spectacle: Sex, Race and Subjectivity in Public Response to the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill “Sexual Harassment” Hearings', American Journal of Political Science 37, 699–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C.: 1993, ‘Codes of Ethics: Bricks without Straw', Business Ethics: A European Review 4, 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 1998, ‘Towards a New Ethics/The Contributions of Poststructuralism and Posthumanism', in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics and Organizations (Sage Publications, London), pp. 76–121.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Graaf, G. Discourse Theory and Business Ethics. The Case of Bankers' Conceptualizations of Customers. Journal of Business Ethics 31, 299–319 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010772910497

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010772910497

Navigation