Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Of goats and groups: A study on social capital in development projects

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More and more development projects are using group or community approaches to disseminate technology and resources. It is believed that using such an approach will provide a safety net as well as social control to ensure the sustainability of the technology and resource. However, little is known of the exact process and social networks that are mobilized and used in using such an approach. Particular attention is devoted in the paper to gender differences and the concept of social capital for analyzing social networks. Cases and the analysis were drawn from Heifer Project International's efforts to disseminate improved goat breeds through a village group process in Tanzania. An examination of these case studies shows that internal processes are crucial in understanding technology transfer. In all groups, a person's social capital did determine whether a member got a goat, and a person's ability to access and manage information also played an important role. Of all the groups, the most successful and sustainable had a history of interaction and were involved within several projects in which the members met each other in different arenas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akker, J. and J. Shumaker (1996). The Cornerstone Model. Little Rock, Arkansas: Heifer Project International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angen, M. (1993). Gender Issues in Arumeru District: A Survey Report. CIDA, Dar es Salam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, J. D. (ed.) (1994). Beyond Capitalism vs. Socialism in Kenya and Tanzania. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). “The forms of capital,” in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cala, E. and C. Jette (1994). Posesion y Control deTtierras en Una Communidad del Antiplano Central. La Paz, Bolivia. IBTA 138/Boletin Technico 07/SR-CRSP.

  • Carlsson, E. (1996). “Small holder dairy farming. An aspect of farm intensification.” Lund Papers in Economic History. No. 58. Department of Economic History, Lund University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). “Social capital in the creation of human capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement): S95-S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, N., C. Valdivia, G. Njeru, and D. Sheikh (1996). Of Goats, Groups and Gender: A Research Report on the Sociological Impacts of the Kenya Dual Purpose Goat. University of Missouri: Kenya SR-CRSP Technical Report Series, TR-MU 96-1.

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, E. (1994). “Aspects of credit in dairy development: The HPI Tanzania Experience.” Tanzanian Society of Animal Production 21.

  • Lele, U. (1975). The Design of Rural Development. London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. and A. Long (eds.) (1992). Battlefields of Knowledge: The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, L. and C. Jette (1994). Estrategias Sociales Hacia la Sosyenibilidad en Los Andes. Un estudio de caso del Antiplano Central. La Paz, Bolivia: IBTA 139/Boletin Tecnico 08/SR-CRSP.

  • McCormack, J., M. Walsh, and C. Nelson (1986). Women's Group Enterprises: A Study of the Structure of Opportunity of the Kenya Coast. Boston: World Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D. and L. Prichett (1996). “Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania.” Paper presented at the World Bank conference “Rural Well-Being: From Vision to Action,” September 25–27, 1996.

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). “The prosperous community: Social capital and public life.” The American Prospect 13: 35-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serageldin, I. (1994). Making Development Sustainable: From Concept to Action. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monograph Series No. 2. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serageldin, I. (1996). Sustainability and the Wealth of Nations: First Step in an Ongoing Journey. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monograph Series No. 5. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia, C. (2001), “Gender, livestock assets, resource management, and food security: Lessons from the SR-CRSP.” Agriculture and Human Values 18(1): 27-39 (this issue).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villareal, M. (1994). Wielding and Yielding: Power, Subordination and Gender Identity in the Context of a Mexican Development Project. Published PhD, Wageningen Agricultural University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rural Sociology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA

    Nicoline de Haan

Authors
  1. Nicoline de Haan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Haan, N. Of goats and groups: A study on social capital in development projects. Agriculture and Human Values 18, 71–84 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007633501969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007633501969

Search

Navigation