Abstract
The term “evolution” is often used in the administrative sciences to designate dynamic processes of change in general. In biology, evolution has a very specific meaning, namely the application of a generative variation-selective retention scheme to change. Applying this to the administrative sciences is more exacting: describing what the variation consists of, how replication of the generated variation occurs and delineating the population from which the selection is made are far from easy. While it is the intention of this special issue as a whole to provide some empirical examples of evolutionary change in the public and private sectors, this introduction will lay out the main lines of thought in what is often referred to as universal Darwinism and what this means in the administrative sciences. Key concepts here are generative variation, selective retention, and selective institutional environment. According to the authors, the Darwinian scheme of evolutionary theory focuses on how new ideas or concepts arise, how they propagate and influence wider actor thinking and on how the institutional environment in which they operate affects their differential survival. This evolutionary process is an interplay between actors and replicators (sounds, images, and in this context mostly words) in which it cannot be said in advance which one is fooling the other.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aunger, R. (ed.) (2002), Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, Oxford University Press.
Aunger, R. (2001), The Electric Meme: A New Theory of How We Think, New York: Free Press.
Blackmore, S. (1999), The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press.
Brandon, R. N. (1988), “The levels of selection: A hierarchy of interactors,” in Plotkin, H. C. (ed.), The Role of Behavior in Evolution, Boston: MIT Press.
Brodie, R. (1995), Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme, New York: Integral Press.
Campbell, D. T. (1987), “Evolutionary epistemology,” in Radnitzky, G. and Barttley, W. W. (eds): Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality and the Sociology of Knowledge, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Cziko, G. (1997), Without Miracles: Universal Selection Theory and the Second Darwinian Revolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1982), The Extended Phenotype, Cambridge University Press.
De Jong, M. (1999), “Survival of the institutionally fittest concepts,” in Journal of Memetics: Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, http:/www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/1999/Vol. 1.
De Jong, M. (2001), “Manipulative tactics in budgetary processes: the art and craft of getting the money you don’t deserve,” in: Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, Volume 14(1), 50–66.
Dennett, D. (1993), Consciousness Explained, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Dennett, D. (1995), Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Dirlam, D. K. (2003), “Competing memes analysis,” in: Journal of Memetics—Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, Volume 7(1), http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/2003/vol7.
Dosi, G. (1984), Technical Change and Industrial Transformation, London: Macmillan.
Edmonds, B. (2002), “Three challenges for the survival of memetics,” in Journal of Memetics—Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, Volume 6(2), http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/2002/vol6.
Foucault, M. (1988), Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1990), A History of Sexuality: An Introduction, New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1995), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage Books.
Frank, J. (2000), “Applying memetics to financial markets: Do markets evolve toward efficiency,” in Journal of Memetics—Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, Volume 3(2), http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1999/vol3.
Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. (1977), “The population ecology of organizations,” American Journal of Sociology, Volume 82(5), 929–964.
Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. (1989), Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, MA/London, England: Harvard University Press.
Heylighen, F. (1997), “Objective, subjective, and intersubjective selectors of knowledge,” in Evolution and Cognition, Volume 3 (1), 63–67.
Hull, D. L. (1973), “A populational approach to scientific change: A book review of Toulmin’s ‘human understanding,’” in Science, Volume 182(14), December 1973, 1121–1124.
Hull, D. L. (1988), Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Krasner, S. D. (1984), “Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical analysis,” in Comparative Politics, Volume 16(1), 223–246.
Krasner, S. D. (1988), “Sovereignty: An institutional perspective,” in Comparative Political Studies, Volume 21(1), 66–94.
Laland, K. and Brown, G. (2001), Sense and Nonsense in Evolutionary Theory, Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Latour, B. (1997), Aramis or the Love of Technology, London: Routledge.
Lynch, A. (1999), Thought Contagion: How Belief Spreads Through Society, New York: Basic Books.
Maynard Smith, J. (1982), Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Plotkin, H. (1994), Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge, Harvard University Press.
Popper, K. R. (1971), The Open Society and Its Enemies, Princeton University Press.
Popper, K. R. (1992a), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge.
Popper, K. R. (1992b), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge.
Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: The Free Press.
Radnitzky, G. and Bartley, W. W. (1987), Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Toulmin, S. (1972), Human Understanding, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Van den Bergh, Jeroen & Detlef Fetchenhauer (2001), “Voorbij het Rationele Model: Evolutionaire Verklaringen van Gedrag” en Sociaal-Economische Instituties, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Den Haag.
Weibull, J. W. (1997), Evolutionary Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Additional information
Martin De Jong is associate professor of public management.
Haiko Van der Voort is a research associate who lectures and publishes on a wide range of issues including process management and system innovations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Jong, M., Van der Voort, H. Evolutionary theory in the administrative sciences: Introduction. Know Techn Pol 16, 16–29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-004-1012-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-004-1012-5