Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethical and environmental considerations in the release of herbicide resistant crops

  • Articles
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular genetics, plant physiology, and biochemistry have opened up the new biotechnology of herbicide resistant crops (HRCs). Herbicide resistant crops have been characterized as the solution for many environmental problems associated with modern crop production, being described as powerful tools for farmers that may increase production options. We are concerned that these releases are occurring in the absence of forethought about their impact on agroecosystems, the broader landscape, and the rural and urban economies and cultures. Many of the benefits and risks associated with HRCs are not apparent to either the public, farmers, policy makers, or the scientific community. HRC technology raises moral issues in three areas: our duties toward the natural environment; our political and economic responsibilities to each other; and our communal character as one generation among many. We also need a rational basis on which to make evaluations of this new biotechnology. The technical aspects of their release require a logical guide to the ecological, environmental, and biological effects the release might have in sustainable agroecosystems. The initial step should include an assessment of the intrinsic qualities of the crop, the herbicide, and the resistance mechanisms. The second step should include an assessment of effects associated with population ecology, population genetics, environmental degradation, consumer health, and farm economic viability due to the resistant crop-herbicide pair. Herbicides have been used in crop production for nearly a half a century. There has been a tremendous increase in the use of these chemicals in that time. Society has seen the use of these chemicals not only help to feed many people, but also to bring costs not anticipated before the introduction of the chemicals. We need to draw on that long history of use and learn the lessons it can provide us as we approach the introduction and commercialization of the next generation of weed control technology, herbicide resistant crops. We also need to reflect on the lessons we missed during that half century because we spend more time imagining the possible benefits that would come from the technology than scrutinizing the possible harm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, R. J. 1984.Weed-Crop Ecology. Belmont, CA: Breton-Wadsworth, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. C. 1986.Cell culture selection for herbicide tolerant corn and its ramifications. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conferences, Publication 41, Washington, D.C.: American Trade Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1988. “Ethics for Biotechnology: Articulate questions, suggested frameworks. No easy answers.”Industrial Biotechnology Association Reports, June, pp. 1–6.

  • Anonymous. 1985 (Sept.–Oct.).AgBiotechnology News. P. 3.

  • Barrett, S. C. H. 1983. “Crop mimicry in weeds.”Econ. Bot. 37: 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbrook, C. M. and P. Moses. 1986. “Engineering crops to resist herbicides.”Technology Review, November/December, pp. 59–79.

  • Beversdorf, W. D. and D. J. Hume. 1984. “OAC Triton spring rapeseed.”Can. J. Plant Sci. 64, 1007–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beversdorf, W. D., D. J. Hume, and M. J. Donnelly-Vanderloo. 1988. “Agronomic performance of triazine-resistant and susceptible reciprocal spring canola hybrids.”Crop Science 28: 932–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beversdorf, W. D., J. Weiss-Lerman, L. R. Erickson, and V. Sousa Machado. 1980. “Transfer of cytoplasmically inherited triazineresistance from Bird's rape to cultivated oilseed (Brassica campestris andB. napus).”Can. J. of Genet. Cytol. 22: 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, E. M., M. J. Duffy, J. V. Hay, and D. D. Schlueter. 1988. “Sulfonylureas.” InHerbicides: Chemistry, degradation, and mode of action, P. C. Kearney and D. D. Kaufman, eds. Ch. 3. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, Orvin C. May, 1990. “Position Statement: Herbicide tolerant crops.” Head, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, College of Agriculture, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108.

  • Chen, H. H. and A. D. Druliner. 1988. “Non-point ground water contamination: agricultural chemical contamination of ground water in six areas of the High Plains Aquifer, Nebraska.”U.S. Geological Survey National Water Summary 1986, pp. 103–108, Water Supply Paper 2325.

  • Comstock, G. 1989. “Genetically engineered herbicide resistance. Part 1.”J. Agric. Ethics 2: 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, G. 1990. “Genetically engineered herbicide resistance. Part 2.”J. Agric. Ethics 3: 114–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. 1991.Herbicide-Resistant Crops. CAST No. 1991-1, Ames, IA.

  • Coupland, D. 1985. “Metabolism of glyphosate in plants.” InThe herbicide glyphosate, E. Grossbard and D. Atkinson, eds., London: Butterworths, pp. 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, M. L. 1990. “Debating the responsibilities of plant scientists in the decade of the environment.”Plant Cell 2: 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, M. L. 1991. “The very structure of scientific research mitigates against developing products to help the environment, the poor, and the hungry.”J. Agric. Ethics 4.

  • Dekker, J., R. Burmeister and J. Wendel. 1991. “Mutant weeds of Iowa: Iv. s-triazine resistant plastids inPolygonum pensylvanicum L.”Weed Technol. 5: 211–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, J. 1990. “Molecular evidence for gene flow among Zea species.”BioScience 40: 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand, N. C. 1988. “Pollen as a vehicle for the escape of engineered genes.”Trends in ecology and evolution 3(4): S30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand, N. C. and C. A. Hoffman. 1990. “Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes.”BioScience 40: 438–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forney, D. R., S. Sebastian, G. M. Fader, and J. Ulrich. 1989. “Development of sulfonylurea-resistant. soybeans and associated weed control options.”Weed Science Society of America Abstracts 29: 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldburg, R., J. Rissler, H. Shand, and C. Hasselbrook. 1990.Biotechnology's bitter harvest: Herbicidetolerant crops and the threat to sustainable agriculture. A report of the biotechnology working group. Washington, DC.

  • Goodman, R. M. 1987. “Future potential, problems, and practicalities of herbicide-tolerant crops from genetic engineering.”Weed Science 35: 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. M. and N. Newell. 1985. “Genetic engineering of plants for herbicide resistance status and prospects.” InEngineering organisms in the environment: Scientific issues, H. D. Halvorsobn, D. Pramer, and M. Rogul, eds. Pp. 47–53. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. of Microbiology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, T. W. and E. I. Mercer. 1983.Introduction to plant biochemistry. Second edition. Pp. 339–341. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gressel, J. and L. A. Segal. 1978. “The paucity of plants evolving genetic resistance to herbicides possible reasons and implications.”J. Theor. Biol. 75: 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallberg, G. R., R. D. Kibra, K. R. Long, and R. C. Splinter. 1987. “Pesticides, groundwater, and rural drinking water quality in Iowa.”Proceedings of the conference on pesticides and groundwater: A health concern for the midwest, pp. 83–104, Oct. 1986. Freshwater Foundation.

  • Harlan, J. R. 1982. “Relationships between weeds and crops.” InBiology and ecology of weeds, W. Holzner and N. Numata, eds. Ch. 8. The Hague, Netherlands: W. Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. S. and H. M. LeBaron. 1990. “Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance.”Weed Technol. 4: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J., L. McIntosh. 1983. “Molecular basis of herbicide resistance inAmaranthus hybridus L.”Science 222, 1346–1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, T., D. R. Elam, and N. Ellstrand. 1991. “Radish as a model system for the study of engineered gene escape rates via crop-weed mating.”Conservation Biology, V. 5, pp. 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivilaan, A. and R. S. Bandurski. 1981. “The one-hundred-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment.”Am. J. Bot. 68(9): 1290–1292.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, H. M. and J. Gressel. 1982.Herbicide resistance in plants. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looker, D. 1989a. “Scepter stunts Iowa corn; damage payments sought.”Des Moines Register, June 20, 1989, p. 1a.

  • Looker, D. 1989b. “Farmers sue maker of Scepter, 2 other firms.”Des Moines Register, July 4, 1989, p. 5s.

  • Mallory-Smith, C. A., D. C. Thill, and M. J. Dial. 1990. “Identification of sulfonylurea resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola).”Weed Technol. 4: 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. H. and W. H. Leonard. 1967.Field crops. 2nd Ed., pp. 346–375. London: Macmillan Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, B. J. and S. C. Falco. 1989. “The development of herbicide-resistant crops.”Ann. Rev. of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 441–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1987.Regulating pesticides in food: the Delany paradox. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1989.Field testing genetically modified organisms: framework for decisions. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, E. G. and L. K. Lee. 1987.The magnitude and costs of groundwater contamination from agricultural chemicals: a national perspective. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 576.

  • Nussbaum, M. C. 1983. “Flawed Crystals: James's ‘The Golden Bowl’ and literature as moral philosophy.”New Literary History 15, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, W., D. Sommers, D. Wyse, J. Gronwald, and B. Gengenbach. 1989. “Sethoxydim-tolerant corn mutants.”Weed Science Society of America Abstracts 29: 178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powles, S. B. and P. D. Howat. 1990. “Herbicide-resistant weeds in Australia.”Weed Technol. 4: 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. C., J. E. Hill, and R. W. Allard. 1983. “Genetic variability for herbicide reaction in plant populations.”Weed Science 31: 652–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primiani, M., J. C. Cotterman, and L. L. Saari. 1990. “Resistance of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides.”Weed Technol. 4: 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H. A. 1968. “The changing population of viable weed seeds in an arable soil.”Weed Res. 8: 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, S. A. and R. S. Chaleff. 1987. “Soybean mutants with increased tolerance for sulfonylurea herbicides.”Crop Science 27: 948–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaner, D., K. Newhouse, B. Singh, and M. Stidham. 1989. “Correlation between herbicide resistance of maize lines and acetohydroxyacid synthase sensitivity to imidazolinones and sulfonylureas.”Weed Science Society of America Abstracts 29: 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stannard, M. E. and P. K. Fay. 1987. “Selection of alfalfa seedlings for tolerance to chlorsulfuron.”Weed Science Society of America Abstracts 27: 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water. 1985. “National primary water regulations: Synthetic organic chemicals, inorganic chemicals and microorganisms.”Federal Register 50: 46936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weed Science Society of America. 1989.Herbicide Handbook. WSSA, Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. M., P. W. Holden, D. W. Parsons, and M. N. Lorber. 1988 (December).Pesticides in ground water data base: 1988 interim report. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. D. 1990. “Gene flow in squash species.”BioScience 40: 449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, P. W. and A. E. Hitchcock. 1942.Contributions Boyce Thompson Institute 12: 321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Jack Dekker is a weed biologist in the Agronomy Department at the Iowa State University, conducting research on the physiological, genetic, and biochemical mechanisms of herbicide resistance in plants. He also serves as Chairperson of the Herbicide Resistant Weed Committee of the Weed Science Society of America.

Gary Comstock is a philosopher of religion and an ethicist in the Philosophy Department at the Iowa State University. He has written several articles on ethics and agricultural biotechnology, including “The Case Against bGH,” “The Costs and Benefits of bGH May Not Be Distributed Fairly,” “Genetically Engineered Herbicide Resistance,” and “Should We Manipulate the Genome of Domestic Hogs?” He serves as Coordinator of the Bioethics Program at Iowa State University.

Journal Paper No. J-14685 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 2993.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dekker, J., Comstock, G. Ethical and environmental considerations in the release of herbicide resistant crops. Agric Hum Values 9, 31–43 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217919

Keywords

Navigation