Abstract
Contemporary bioethics is characterized by an aspiration on the part of many to establish in international law, conventions, and policy a single, globally guiding understanding of moral principles that can shape health care policy across the world. This aspiration to universal validity has deep roots in Western European moral and philosophical commitments that framed the Enlightenment and found its particularly stringent and influential expression in the thought of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804). These commitments have inspired the human rights movements that took shape after the Second World War and gave new force to the French Revolution’s endeavor to establish positive moral claims that are supposed to be compellingly rational and therefore universally valid. This vision of a general humanitarian morality presupposes that individuals fully realize their human dignity only in a society that is at the same time a moral community bound by a content-rich understanding of human rights that should transcend national borders.1 In terms of these commitments not only all particular value communities, but equally all particular political societies should be recast so as to frame one globally unified society as a universal moral community, within which those positive rights are realized.
I wish to thank H.T.Engelhardt, Jr., for his helpful criticism of this article.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Council of Europe. (1996). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996. Directorate of Legal Affairs, Strasbourg.
Council of Europe. (1997). Explanatory Report to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Directorate of Legal Affairs, Strasbourg.
Delkeskamp-Hayes, C. (2000). Respecting, Protecting Persons, Humans, and Conceptual Muddles in the Bioethics Convention, The Journal of Philosophy and Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 147–180.
Delkeskamp-Hayes, C. (in press). The Moral Justification of Political Power, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Global Summit of National Bioethics Commissions. (1999). Tokyo Communique. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 9, 3–4.
Hartmann, K. (1991). “The Profit Motive in Kant and Hegel”, in Rights to Health Care, eds. T.J. Bole and W.B. Bondeson, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Holmes, S., and Sunstein, C.R. (1999). The Cost of Rights. Why Liberty Depends on Taxes. W.W. Norton and Company, New York.
Kant, I. (1786). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, 2nd edition, Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, Riga.
Kant, I. (1788). Critik der practischen Vernunft, Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, Riga.
Kant, I. (1793). “Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis”, Berlinische Monatsschrift, September, pp. 201–284
Kant, I. ( 1797, I). Die Metaphysik der Sitten in zwey Theilen, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Friedrich Nicolovius, Königsberg.
Kant, I. ( 1797, II). Die Metaphysik der Sitten in zwey Theilen, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, Friedrich Nicolovius, Königsberg.
Plato. (1971). The Collected Dialogues of Plato, eds. E. Hamilton and H. Cairns, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Qiu, R. (2001). “Tension between Biomedical Technology and Confucian Values”, in this vol. pp. 71–88.
Sakamoto, H. (2001). “A New Possibility of Global Bioethics as an Intercultural Social Tuning Technology”, in this volume, pp. 359–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Delkeskamp-Hayes, C. (2002). Global Biomedicine, Human Dignity, and the Moral Justification of Political Power. In: Po-Wah, J.T.L. (eds) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics. Philosophy of Medicine, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1195-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1195-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5969-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1195-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive