Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review of Management Scholarship and Organisational Change: Representing Burns and Stalker by Miriam Green

Routledge, 2019, 196 pp., ISBN: 978-1138698383

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Claridon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. 2017. Bridging the gap between individual and corporate responsible behaviour: Toward a performative concept of corporate codes. Philosophy of Management 16 (1): 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T.E., and G.M. Stalker. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaujany, F., J. Aroles, and P. Laniray. 2019. Towards a political philosophy of management: Performativity and visibility in management practices. Philosophy of Management 18 (1): 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. 2009. Analysis of a text and its representations: Univocal truth or a situation of undecidability? Philosophy of Management 7 (1): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. 2019. Management scholarship and organisational change: Representing Burns and Stalker. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. 2007. Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivatives markets. In Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics, ed. D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 54–86. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, P. 2006. The possibility of the testimony: A case for case study research. Organization 13 (1): 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. 1975. Beginnings: Intention and method. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosselman, E. 2014. The 'performativity thesis' and its critics: Towards a relational ontology of management accounting. Accounting & Business Research 44 (2): 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Accounting Department, Aston Business School, Aston University, Aston Triangle, B4 7ET, Birmingham, UK

    Ivo De Loo

Authors
  1. Ivo De Loo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo De Loo.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Loo, I. Review of Management Scholarship and Organisational Change: Representing Burns and Stalker by Miriam Green. Philosophy of Management 19, 217–221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00133-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00133-1

Search

Navigation