Skip to main content
Log in

The Economic Sphere

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herman Dooyeweerd (1985) argued that among the modalities making up the fabric of reality a specifically economic one is to be found. The aim of the present paper is to discuss the texture of such a modality and how it both differentiates and intertwines with others. For an updated brief, albeit cogent and analytically lucid presentation of the Law Framework ontology, see Clouser (2009). Dooyeweerd’s view entails that the proper object of economics is irreducible to that of other disciplines, but a non-reductionist view of the object of economics presupposes that the nuclear meaning of that discipline has been clearly delimited: this is required in order to determine its nature and separate identity as a scientific discipline. By ‘the nuclear meaning of a discipline’ I understand a pre-theoretical delimitation of its field of research, such as that of the field of physics, characterized by the laws governing force and energy. Within one and the same field there may be many theories, theories competing to explain the same phenomena, or dealing with phenomena so different that it is nearly impossible to trace conceptual connections among them. This last situation calls for a unified-field theory. In the second section of this paper I will attempt to defend a rather commonly accepted definition of the field of economics that sees this discipline as a science of choice. In the third I will show how the analytical conception it involves can be naturally complemented with a classificatory one. According to a classificatory conception, the aggregated social-level phenomena, patterns and regularities economic theories usually deal with, are economic in that sense, even though they are not prima facie cases of individual behavior, or are unintended consequences of aggregated individual choices. In the fourth I will discuss the meaning of the most general, supra-arbitrary economic laws—the modal laws of economics. In the final section I will offer a non-reductionist view of economics that nevertheless takes into account its intertwining with other spheres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clouser RA (2009) A new philosophical guide for the sciences: ontology without reduction, this volume

  • Clouser RA (2005) The myth of religious neutrality. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd H (1985) A new critique of theoretical thought, vol. 4. Paideia Press, Jordan Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd H (1979) Roots of western culture. Wedge, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Embree J (1939) Suye mura, a Japanese village. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause U (1982) Money and abstract labor. Verso, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel E (1962) Tratado de economía marxista, vol. 2. Ediciones Era, México

  • Marx K (1976) Capital, vol. 3. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1868) Letter to Ludwig Kugelmann in hanover, 11 July 1868. In: Marx-Engels collected works, vol. 43, p 67, http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/cw/index.htm

  • Pareto V (1927) Manuel d’economie politique. M. Giard et E. Brière, Paris

  • Robbins L (1984) An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adolfo García de la Sienra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García de la Sienra, A. The Economic Sphere. Axiomathes 20, 81–94 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9077-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9077-0

Keywords

Navigation