Abstract
The question of quantitative methods versus qualitative methods appears periodically in most of the scientific fields. Which is the most relevant? The most useful? Do we find the same things when using these two options, are they congruent? While most of the academic fields have a quite important and strong literature dealing with these questions nowadays, it is not really the case for zoosemiotics. In this paper, I will introduce the main issues zoosemioticians can resolve by using quantitative methods and tools, and how and why it is mandatory to implement them if qualitative theory to pursue our researches further.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, S., Örnborg, J., & Andersson, M. (1998). Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 445–450.
Au, W. L. (1993). The sonar of dolphins. Springer-Verlag.
Bodamer, M. D., Gardner, R. A. (2002). How cross-fostered chimpanzees (pan troglodytes) initiate and maintain conversations. Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C.: 1983), 116(1), 12–26.
Cornell, H. N., Marzluff, J. M., & Pecoraro, S. (2012). Social learning spreads knowledge about dangerous humans among American crows. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 279, 499–508.
Dinkel, T., & Lunau, K. (2001). How drone flies (Eristalis tenax L., Syrphidae, Diptera) use floral guides to locate food sources. Journal of Insect Physiology, 47(10), 1111–1118.
Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Mc Cowan, B. (2012). The span of correlations in dolphin whistle sequences. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2012/06/P06002.
Forsberg, N., Burley, M., Hämäläinen, N. (Eds.). (2012). Language, ethics and animal life: Wittgenstein and beyond (Vol. 1–1). Bloomsbury.
Fouts, R. (1997). Next of kin: What chimpanzees have taught me about who we are. William Morrow and Company.
Payne, K. B., Langauer, W. B. (2000) Elephant communication. In Shoshani, J. (Ed.) Elephants: Majestic creatures of the wild. Checkmark books, 116–123.
Rosenthal, R. (1970). Le préjugé du maître et l’apprentissage de l’élève. Revue française de pédagogie, 13(1), 38–49.
Scopa, C., Contalbrigo, L., Greco, A., Lanatà, A., Scilingo, E. P., & Baragli, P. (2019). Emotional transfer in human-horse interaction: New perspectives on equine assisted interventions. Animals: an open access journal from MDPI, 9(12), 1030.
Smith, J. D., Schull, J., Strote, J., McGee, K., Egnor, R., & Erb, L. (1995). The uncertain response in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Experimental Psychology, 124(4), 391–408.
Terrace, H. S. (1987). Nim. Columbia university.
Thoen, H., et al. (2014). A different form of color vision in Mantis shrimp. Science, 343(6169), 411–413.
Worchel, S., Lee, J., & Adewole, A. (1975). Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 906–914.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delahaye, P. Use of Quantitative Measures in Zoosemiotics: how Machines Are Becoming a New Pair of Ears and Eyes for Researchers. Biosemiotics 14, 287–294 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09440-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09440-0