Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From an Implicit Christian Corporate Culture to a Structured Conception of Corporate Ethical Responsibility in a Retail Company: A Case-Study in Hermeneutic Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a qualitative research about the way in which business leaders of a retail company gradually clarify the ethical responsibilities of their company – in an ongoing discussion of particular cases. It is based on 12 years of experience as an external member of the ethics committee. The aim of the article is not so much as to evaluate the different single decisions that were made and implemented to make the company meet high ethical standards, but rather to focus on three issues and on how they relate to each other: (1) the shift from a communitarian Christian set of values to a broader secular framework of basic principles; (2) the way in which business people in a retailing company cope with issues that seem ethically troublesome, when reflected upon from a ethical point of view; and (3) how the process of ethical dialogue has led to a typology of the different levels of responsibility that retailers are willing to attribute to themselves according to the kind of problem at stake. The three issues together illustrate how a company that took the business ethics question head-on systematically moved into a particular ongoing collective learning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acquier, A., J.-P. Gond and J. Igalens: 2005, ‹Des fondements religieux de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise à la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise comme religion’, Unpublished working paper (Cahier de recherche 2005-166), IAE Toulouse

  • Alford, Helen, Charles Clark, S. Cortright and Michael Naughton: 2006, Rediscovering Abundance. Interdisciplinary Essays on Wealth, Income, and Their Distribution in the Catholic Social Tradition, (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, Jerôme and Françoise de Bry: 2001, L’entreprise et l’éthique, (Seuil, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balligand J-P. and de Foucauld J-B.: 2000, L’épargne salariale au cœur du contrat social, (La documentation française, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthoin, Ariane and André Sobczak: 2007, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in France. A Mix of National and International Influences’, Business and Society 46 (1), 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, M. and M. Zolner: 2008, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Mexico and France: Exploring the Role of Normative Institutions’, Business and Society doi:10.1177/0007650307309434

  • Boissonnat, Jean: 1999, L’aventure du christianisme social. Passé et avenir. (Bayard, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre: 1978, ‹Sur l’objectivation participante. Réponse à quelques objections’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 23, 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Archie B.: 1991, ‹The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons, 34, 39-48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Jeasik and Allen Trent: 2006, ‹Validity in qualitative research revisited’, Qualitative Research 5 (3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, Jennifer: 2004, ‹Practice in focus: A hermeneutic approach to research ethics’, British Journal of Learning Disabilities 32, 186–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demuijnck, G.: 2009, `Non-Discrimination in Human Resources Management as a Moral Obligation', Journal of Business Ethics 88, 83–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, Virginia, Erica James, Sandra Kippen and Pranee Liamputtong: 2007, ‹Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face?’. Qualitative Research 7(3) 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas: 1994, ‹When integration fails: the logic of prescription and description in business ethics’. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2), 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, Georges and Lee Tavis: 1998, ‹A Balanced Concept of the Firm and the Measurement of Its Longterm Planning and Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1121–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falise, Michel: 1985, Une pratique chrétienne de l’économie, (Le centurion, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg, Andreas. W.: 2004, ‹When in Rome… Moral Maturity and Ethics for International Economic Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 54, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J.: 1987, ‹A Survey and Critique of Business Ethics Research’, In W. Frederick (Ed.) Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, (IAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich, John Paul: 1993, ‹The Ethical Behavior of Retail Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics, 12 (3), 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer H.G.: 1960, Wahrheit und Methode, (Mohr, Tübingen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E. and D. Melé: 2004, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory’, Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1–2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobin, B. and G. d’ Herblin: 2007, Le Secret des Mulliez - Révélations Sur le Premier Empire Familial Français, (Editions la Borne Seize, s.l.)

  • Gosseries, Axel: 2004, ‹Are Seniority Privileges Unfair?’. Economics and Philosophy 20 (2), 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, Johan: 2002, ‹Sourcing ethics in the textile sector: the case of C&A’, Business Ethics: A European Review 11, 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen: 1991, Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik, (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1970, Moral Stages and Moralization. Moral Development and Behavior, (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, Glenn: 2007, ‹A Common Pitch and the Management of Corporate Relations: Interpretation, Ethics and Managerialism’, Journal of Business Ethics 71, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, Jennifer and Sandra Waddock: 2006, ‹The Emergence of Total Responsibility Management Systems: J. Sainsbury’s (plc) Voluntary Responsibility Management Systems for Global Food Retail Supply Chains’, Business and Society Review 111 (4), 409–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon, J. M. and Yuthas, K.: 1997, ‹Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development’, Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12/13), 1213–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, Josep M. and Alfons Sauquet: 1999, ‹Integrating Business and Ethical Value Through Practitioners Dialogue’, Journal of Business Ethics 22, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschan-Piekkari, Rebecca and Catherine Welch (Eds.): 2004, Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, Roselie, Catherine Giapponi and Cheryl Tromley: 2007, ‹A Model of Ethical Decision Making: The Integration of Process and Content’, Journal of Business Ethics 73, 219–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Geoff: 2001, ‹Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry’, Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3–4), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Patrick and Georges Enderle: 1995, ‹Managerial Ethical Leadership: Examples Do Matter’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (1), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, Pieter and Paul Matthyssens: 2004, ‹The Architecture of Multiple Case Study in International Business’. In: Marschan-Piekkari, Rebecca and Catherine Welch (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 125-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randels, George: 1998, ‹The Contingency of Business: Narrative, Metaphor, and Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12), 1299–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and Robin, D. P.: 1991, ‹A Conceptual Model of Corporate Moral Development’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(4), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur Paul: 1983, Temps et récit I, (Paris: Seuil).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, R. S.: 2000, ‹Studying Moral Ethos Using an Adapted Kohlbergian Model’, Organization Studies 21(1), 267–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, B. S. and Camburn, A.: 1993, ‹Stages of Moral Development of Corporations’, Journal of Business Ethics 12(9), 727–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterba, James: 2005, The triumph of practice over theory in ethics, (Oxford university press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Takala, Tuomo and Outi Uusitalo: 1995, ‹Retailers’ Professional and Professio-Ethical Dilemmas: The Case of Finnish Retailing Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 893–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, Linda Klebe and Gary R. Weaver: 1994, ‹Business Ethics/Business Ethics: One Field or Two?’. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, Lieke van der and Widdershoven, Guy (2004). Integrated empirical ethics: loss of normativity. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 7(1), pp. 71-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tongeren, Paul: 1996, ‹Ethics, Tradition and Hermeneutics’, Ethical Perspectives 3, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, Gary R. and Linda Klebe Trevino: 1994, ‹Normative and Empirical Business Ethics: Separation, Marriage of Convenience, or Marriage of Necessity?’. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, Patricia: 1994, ‹The Normative/Descriptive Distinction in Methodologies of Business Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whysall, Paul: 1995, ‹Ethics in Retailing’, Business Ethics. A European Review 4 (3), 150–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whysall, Paul: 1998, ‹Ethical Relationships in Retailing: Some Cautionary Tales’, Business Ethics. A European Review 7 (2), 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdershoven, Guy: 2005, ‹Interpretation and dialogue in hermeneutic ethics.’ In Richard Ashcroft, Anneke Lucassen, Michael Parker, Marian Verkerk and Guy Widdershoven (Eds.), Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdershoven, Guy and Lieke van der Scheer: 2008, ‹Theory and methodology of empirical ethics: a pragmatic hermeneutic perspective.’ In Guy Widdershoven, John McMillan, Tony Hope and Lieke van der Scheer (Eds.), Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry, (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Edhec Business School, 58, rue du Port, 59000, Lille, France

    Geert Demuijnck

Authors
  1. Geert Demuijnck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geert Demuijnck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demuijnck, G. From an Implicit Christian Corporate Culture to a Structured Conception of Corporate Ethical Responsibility in a Retail Company: A Case-Study in Hermeneutic Ethics. J Bus Ethics 84 (Suppl 3), 387–404 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0207-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0207-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation