Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Farming systems development: Synthesizing indigenous and scientific knowledge systems

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural development strategies to date were chiefly based on Western technological solutions, with mixed success rates. Farming Systems Research (FSR) was advanced as a way to increase the use of indigenous knowledge of farming to make new technologies more adaptable and appropriate to farming conditions. FSR has enabled researchers to focus attention on people and their knowledge by increasing people's participation in problem identification and new technology validation. In practice, though, FSR continues to be a top-down approach: technologies continue to be developed (in most cases) in the exogenous, Western knowledge system. Little has been done to develop indigenous technology generating and diffusing capacities already present in the rural areas. In this paper, a model adapted from Bell (1979) will be advanced that is based on cooperation and collaboration between the exogenous and indigenous knowledge systems leading to a synthesis of the two. The underlying principle of the model is that the ultimate solution for rural development is not the dumping of more scientists upon rural people (of whatever discipline) to make exogenously-generated technologies more adaptable and in-line with people's problems, but to strengthen, empower, and legitimize indigenous capacities for identifying problems and developing solutions for these problems. The “empowerment” of the indigenous knowledge/technology system (however difficult that may be politically) so that it has equal footing with Western knowledge may well be the most important step in a strategy of enabling the people in the developing countries themselves to alleviate their poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited and Consulted

  • Alverson, Hoyt. “The Wisdom of Tradition in the Development of Dryland Farming: Botswana.”Human Organization 43, No. 1 (1984): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arze, J., C. den Biggelaar, W.Brinkman, E.Frimpong, J.Kimemia, E. Lazaro and M. Timmermans.Agricultural Research and Extension: A Contribution to Understanding the Linkages with Small Scale Farmers. A Case Study in Kumba-Corridor Agro-Ecological Zone, SWP, Cameroon. Wageningen, Netherlands: ICRA and Ekona, Cameroon: Institute of Agronomic Research, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, Jacqueline A. “The Effects of Different Types of Farmer Participation on the Management of On-Farm Trials.”Agricultural Administr ation & Extension 25 (1987): 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, James. “The Concept of the Average Farmer and Putting the Farmer First: The Implications of Variability for a Farming Systems Approach to Research and Extension.” Paper presented at the 10th Annual Symposium of the Association for Farming Systems Research-Extension, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, October 14–17, 1990.

  • Bell, Martin. "The Exploitation of Indigenous Knowledge or the Indigenous exploitation of Knowledge: Whose Use of What for What?"IDS Bulletin 10, no.2 (1979): 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Cattin, Michel. “Dialogue Chercheurs-Paysans: Réflexions et Expérience.” See Peter Matlonet al., eds, (1986): 49–56.

  • Bergen, Dirk. “Farming Systems Research: Not so Spectacular to Farmers as It Is to Researchers?” Paper presented at the 10th Annual Symposium of the Association for Farming Systems Research-Extension, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, October 14–17, 1990.

  • Biggs, Stephen D. and Edward J. “Clay. Sources of Innovation in Agricultural Technology.”World Development 9, No. 4 (1981): 321–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, Derek and Robert Tripp. “Strengthening Linkages in Agricultural Research through a Farming Systems Perspective: The Role of Social Scientists.”Experimental Agriculture 24 (1988): 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, David, Dennis M. Warren & Werner Oswald, eds. Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Robert. “Rural Development: Whose Knowledge Counts?”IDS Bulletin 10, no. 2 (1979): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Robert & B.P. Ghildyal. “Agricultural Research for Research Poor Farmers: The Farmer-First-and-Last Model.”Agricultural Administration & Extension 20, No. 1 (1985): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Robert & Janice Jiggins. “Agricultural Research for Resource-Poor Farmers Part II: A Parsimonious Paradigm.”Agricultural Administration & Extension 27 (1987): 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, Glynn. “Going Nowhere if Skills Aren't Redistributed.”Development 22, no.1 (1980): 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, John. “Farmer Participatory Research: Editorial Introduction.”Experimental Agriculture 24 (1988): 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, John & Adrienne M. Martin. “Farmer Participatory Research: A Review of Concepts and recent Fieldwork.”Agriculture Administration & Extension 29 (1988): 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamser, Matthew S., Helen Appleton and Nicola Carter, eds.Tinker, Tiller, Technical Change. London: IT Publications Ltd., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Budd L. “Participatory Research, Popular Knowledge and Power: A Personal Reflection.”Convergence 14, No. 3 (1981): 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, R.R.Small Farm Development: Understanding and Improving Farming Systems in the Humid Tropics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, Amilcar O. “The Generation of Technologies in Rural Areas.World Development 9 (1981): 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, Michael. The Uses of Indigenous Technical Knowledge in Development.”IDS Bulletin 10, no. 2 (1979): 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Caroline & Robin Cohen. “African Peasants and Their Resistance to Change: A Reconsideration of Sociological Approaches.” In Ivar Oxaalet al., eds.,Beyond the Sociology of Development. Boston: Routledge & Paul, 1975: 105–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, Goran. "The Invisible Economy of Smallholder Agriculture in Africa.” In Joyce Lewinger Moock, ed.,Understanding Africa's Rural Households and Farming Systems. Boulder and London: Westview Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILEIA Newsletter 6, No. 3 (October 1990): Complementary Use of External Inputs.

  • ILEIA Newsletter 5, No. 1 (April 1989): Discussion on Sustaining Agriculture.

  • ILEIA Newsletter 4, No. 3 (October 1988): Participative Technology Development.

  • Johnston, Bruce F. & Clark, William C.Redesigning Rural Development- A Strategic Perspective. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982: 155–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, F.M., R.A. Woog, N. Sriskandarajah & A.C. Andrews. “Systemic Action Research: Towards a New Methodology in Extension.” Paper presented at the 10th Annual Symposium of the Association for Farming Systems Research-Extension, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, October 14–17, 1990.

  • Landeck, Jonathan. “New Age Extension in Farming Systems Research: End of the Technical Message Era.” Paper presented at the 10th Annual Symposium of the Association for Farming Systems Research-Extension, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, October 14–17, 1990.

  • Lightfoot, Clive & Randolph Barker. “On-Farm Trials: A Survey of Methods.”Agricultural Administration & Extension 30 1988: 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, Clive. “Indigenous Research and On-Farm trials.”Agricultural Administration & Extension 24 (1987): 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Ram C. 1986. “An Alternative Strategy for Self-Sustaining Development with Focus on Participation by the Poor at the Local Level.” In United Nations Asian and Pacific Development Institute,Local Level Planning and Rural Development. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company, 1986: 17–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlon, Peter, Ronald Cantrell, David King & Michel Benoit-Cattin.Recherche à la Ferme: Participation des Paysans au Développement de la Technologie Agricole. Ottawa, Ont.: IDRC, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, C., R.H. Brandstetter & G.D. McClure.A Case Study on Farmer Innovations and Communication in Niger. Washington, D.C.: Academy for Educational Development, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, Peter. Science, “Ethnoscience and Agricultural Knowledge Utilization” See Brokenshaet al., 1980: 377–386.

  • Mills, Bradford & Elon Gilbert. “Agricultural Innovation and Technology Testing By Gambian Farmers: Hope for Institutionalizing OFR in Small Country Research Systems?” Paper presented at the FSR/E Symposium, Fayetteville, Arkansas, October 9–11, 1989.

  • Oasa, Edmund K. “Farming Systems Research: A Change in Form But Not in Content.”Human Organization 44, No. 3 (1985): 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradervand, Pierre. “Knowledge is Power.”Development 22, no. 1 (1980): 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajasekaran, B. & Robert A. Martin. “Evaluating the Role of Farmers in Training and Visit Extension System in India.” Paper presented at the 10th Annual Symposium of the Association for Farming Systems Research-Extension, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, October 14–17, 1990.

  • Rhoades, R.E. & R.H. Booth. “Farmer-Back-to-Farmer: A Model for Generating Acceptable Agricultural Technology.”Agricultural Administration 11 (1982): 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Paul. “Community Environmental Knowledge and African Rural Development.”IDS Bulletin 10, no. 2 (1979): 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Paul. 1986.Coping with Hunger: Hazard in a Rural Development in an African Rice Farming System. London: Allen & Unwin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, Niels. "Alternative Approaches in Extension.” In G.E. Jones & M.J. Rolls, eds.,Progress in Rural Extension and Community Development, Vol.I. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982:87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle, Kenneth & Ray Chesterfield. “Change Perceived as Man-Made Hazard in a Rural Development Environment.”Development and Change 7 (1976): 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaner, W.W., P.F. Philipp & W.R. Schmehl.Farming Systems Research and Development: Guidelines for Developing Countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, Jeremy. “Notes on Traditional Knowledge, Modem Knowledge and Rural Development.”IDS Bulletin 10, no. 2 (1979): 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourte, R. “Introduction.” See Peter Matlonet al., eds., 1986: 9–14.

  • Tripp, R.Data Collection, Site Selection and Farmer Participation in On-Farm Experimentation. CIMMYT Working Paper 82/1, 1982.

  • Uphoff, Norman. “Farmer Participation in the Development Process.” In Proceedings of Kansas State University's 1981 Farming Systems Research Symposium — Small Farms in a Changing World: Prospects for the Eighties, edited by Wendy J. Sheppard. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, 1982: 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, Arnoldo. “Culture and Technology, A Non Neutral Approach.”Development: Seeds of Change 1981, no. 3/4: 60–64.

  • Waibel, Hermann, Dorrit Benden & Nittaya Karinchai. “Farmer's Approach to Experimentation.”ILEIA Newsletter 3 (1990): 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Dennis M. “Indigenous Knowledge Systems for Activating Local Decision-Making Groups in Rural Development.” In G. Chuet al., eds.,Communication for Group Transformation in Development. Honolulu: East-West Centre, 1980: 307–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • --. “Ethnoscience in Rural Development.” See Brokenshaet al., 1980: 363–376.

  • Warren, Dennis M. & Meehan, Peter. “Applied Ethnoscience and Dialogical Communication in Rural Development.” See Brokenshaet al., 1980: 317–322.

Download references

Authors
  1. Christoffel den Biggelaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Christoffel den Biggelaar obtained an M.S. degree in Extension Education from Michigan State University in 1989 and is presently a Ph.D. student (specialization of Agroforestry) in the Department of Forestry at this institution. After obtaining his B.S. degree in Agronomy from the Agrarische Hogeschool at 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands, he worked six years as an agricultural teacher and extension agronomist in Burkina Faso, People's Republic of the Congo, and the Central African Republic. He was a participant in the 9th International Course for developmentoriented Research in Agriculture (ICRA) at Wageningen, the Netherlands (January 15 to August 4, 1990), which included a three month interdisciplinary field research project in Cameroon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

den Biggelaar, C. Farming systems development: Synthesizing indigenous and scientific knowledge systems. Agric Hum Values 8, 25–36 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579654

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579654

Keywords

Search

Navigation