Abstract
InMorals by Agreement, David Gauthier (1986) argues that it is rational to intend to cooperate, even in single-play Prisoner's Dilemma games, provided (1) your co-player has a similar intention; (2) both intentions can be revealed to the other player. To this thesis four objections are made. (a) In a strategic decision the parameters on which the argument relies cannot be supposed to be given. (b) Of each pair ofa-symmetric intentions at least one is not rational. But it is impossible to form symmetric intentions to cooperate conditionally. For the condition on which the decision depends cannot be fulfilled without deciding. (c) If one's intention has to be ascertained on the basis of information about one's past performance, it is straightforwardly rational to intend to cooperate, but there is no reason to do so in a single-play PD. (d) The argument cannot be extended ton-person games which are Gauthier's principal concern.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1957,Intention, Blackwell, Oxford.
Arneson, R. J.: 1987, ‘Locke versus Hobbes in Gauthier's Ethics’,Inquiry 30, 295–316.
Baier, A.: 1988, ‘Pilgrim's Progress’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18, 315–30.
Buchanan, J. M.: 1975,The Limits of Liberty, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Buchanan, J. M.: 1988, ‘The Gauthier Enterprise’,Social Philosophy and Policy 5, 75–94; and in Paul, Miller and Paul (eds.), 1988.
Campbell, R.: 1988a, ‘Gauthier's Theory of Morals by Agreement’,Philosophical Quarterly 38, 343–64.
Campbell, R.: 1988b, ‘Moral Justification and Freedom’,Journal of Philosophy 85, 192–213.
Danielson, P.: 1988, ‘The Visible Hand of Morality’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18, 357–84.
Danielson, P.: 1991, ‘Closing the Compliance Dilemma: How it's Rational to be Moral in a Lamarckian World’, in Vallentyne (ed.), pp. 292–322.
Elster, J.: 1979,Ulysses and the Sirens, Cambridge University Press.
Frank, R. H.:Passions Within Reason; the Strategic Role of the Emotions, Norton, New York.
Franssen, M.: 1991, ‘An Analysis and Critique of Gauthier's Modelling of Rational Non-Mediated Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma’, forthcoming,Synthese.
Gauthier, D.: 1979, ‘Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist’,Journal of Philosophy 76, 547–59.
Gauthier, D.: 1982, ‘Three Against Justice: The Foole, the Sensible Knave, and the Lydian Shepherd’,Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7, 11–29.
Gauthier, D.: 1985, ‘The Unity of Reason: A Subversive Reinterpretation of Kant’,Ethics 96, 74–88.
Gauthier, D.: 1986,Morals by Agreement, Oxford University Press (MA).
Gauthier, D.: 1988a, ‘Morality, Rational Choice, and Semantic Representation: A Reply to My Critics’,Social Philosophy and Policy 5, 173–221; and in Paul, Miller and Paul (eds.), 1988.
Gauthier, D.: 1988b, ‘Moral Artifice’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18, 385–418.
Gauthier, D.: 1989, ‘In the Neighbourhood of the Newcomb Predictor’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89, 179–94.
Gauthier, D.: 1991, ‘Rational Constraint: Some Last Words’, in Vallentyne (ed.), pp. 323–30.
Guttman, J. M.: 1978, ‘Understanding Collective Action: Matching Behavior’,Journal of the American Economic Association 68, 251–55.
Hampton, J.: 1987, ‘Free-Rider Problems in the Production of Collective Goods’,Economics and Philosophy 3, 245–73.
Hampton, J.: 1991, ‘Two Faces of Contractarian Thought’, in Vallentyne (ed.), pp. 31–55.
Hardin, R.: 1982,Collective Action, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Hardin, R.: 1985, ‘Individual Sanctions, Collective Benefits’, in Richmond Campbell and Lanning Sowden (eds.),Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation; Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp. 339–54.
Harman, G.: 1988, ‘Rationality in Agreement’,Social Philosophy and Policy 5, 1–16; and in Paul, Miller and Paul (eds.), 1988.
Harsanyi, J. C.: 1977, ‘Rule Utilitarianism and Decision Theory’,Erkenntnis 11, 25–53.
Hartogh, G. den: 1985,Wederkerige Verwachtingen: Konventie, Norm, Verplichting, Amsterdam.
Hartogh, G. den: 1991, ‘Constraining Maximization’, unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
Howard, J. V.: 1988, ‘Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma’,Theory and Decision 24, 203–13.
Kavka, G. S.: 1987a,Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence, Cambridge University Press.
Kavka, G. S.: 1987b, ‘Review of MA’,Mind 96, 117–21.
Lyons, D.: 1965,Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Oxford University Press.
MacIntosh, D.: 1988, ‘Two Gauthiers?’,Dialogue (Canada)28, 43–61.
Narveson, J.: 1988,The Libertarian Idea, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Nelson, A.: 1988, ‘Economic Rationality and Morality’,Philosophy and Public Affairs 17, 149–66.
Parfit, D.: 1984,Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press.
Paul, E. F., Miller, F. D. and Paul, J. (eds.): 1988,The New Social Contract: Essays on Gauthier, Blackwell, Oxford.
Rainbolt, G. W.: 1989, ‘Gauthier on Cooperating in Prisoner's Dilemmas’, Analysis49, 216–20.
Regan, D. H.: 1980,Utilitarianism and Cooperation, Oxford University Press.
Sayre-McCord, G.: 1991, ‘Deception and Reasons to be Moral’, in Vallentyne (ed.), pp. 181–95.
Smith, H.: 1991, ‘Deriving Morality from Rationality’, in Vallentyne (ed.), pp. 229–53.
Taylor, M.: 1987,The Possibility of Cooperation, Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, M. and Ward, H.: 1982, ‘Chickens, Whales, and Lumpy Goods: Alternative Models of Public Goods Provision’,Political Studies 30, 350–70.
Vallentyne, P. (ed.): 1991,Contractarianism and Rational Choice, Cambridge University Press.
Verbeek, B.: 1991, ‘The Evolutionary Explanation of Cooperative Virtue’, unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Den Hartogh, G. The rationality of conditional cooperation. Erkenntnis 38, 405–427 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128238
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128238