Skip to main content
Log in

Bohmian Mechanics Revisited

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of whether there are deterministic theories describing the evolution of an individual physical system in terms of the definite trajectories of its constituent particles and which stay in the same relation to quantum mechanics as Bohmian mechanics but which differ from the latter for what concerns the trajectories followed by the particles. Obviously, one has to impose on the hypothetical alternative theory precise physical requirements. We analyze various such constraints and we show step by step how to meet them. This way of attacking the problem turns out to be useful also from a pedagogical point of view since it allows one to recall and focus on some relevant features of Bohm's theory. One of the central requirements we impose on the models we are going to analyze has to do with their transformation properties under the transformation of the extended Galilei group. In a context like the one we are interested in, one can put forward various requests that we refer to as physical and genuine covariance and invariance. Other fundamental requests are that the theory allows the description of isolated physical systems as well as that it leads to a solution (in the same sense as Bohmian mechanics) of the measurement problem. We show that, even when all the above conditions are taken into account, there are infinitely many inequivalent (from the point of view of the trajectories) bohmian-like theories reproducing the predictions of quantum mechanics. This raises some interesting questions about the meaning of Bohmian mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. S. Bell, in Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166, 180 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. R. Holland, The Quantum Theory of Motion (Cambridge University Press, 1993).

  4. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, The Undivided Universe (Routledge, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì, J. Stat. Phys. 67, 843 (1992); D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory, An Appraisal, J. T. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein, eds. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Berndl, D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, G. Peruzzi, and N. Zanghì, Commun. Math. Phys. 173, 647 (1995); K. Berndl, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory, An Appraisal, J. T. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein, eds. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. J. Squires, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory, An Appraisal, J. T. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein, eds. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. S. Bell, in Themes in Contemporary Physics II (Essays in Honor of Julian Schwinger's 70th Birthday), S. Deser and R. J. Finkelstein, eds. (World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Fonda and G. C. Ghirardi, Symmetry Principles in Quantum Physics (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Baublitz and A. Shimony, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory, An Appraisal, J. T. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein, eds. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. S. Bell, Found. Phys. 12, 989 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Benatti, G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Nuovo Cimento B 101, 333 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Pearle, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277 (1989); G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, and A. Rimini, Phys. Rev. A 42, 78 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, and A. Rimini, Phys. Rev. A 42, 1057 (1990); P. Pearle and E. Squires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1 (1994); G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, and F. Benatti, Found. Phys. 25, 5 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Goldstein, J. Stat. Phys. 47, 645 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Nelson, Quantum Fluctuations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. S. Bell, in Quantum Mechanics, Determinism, Causality and Particles, M. Flato et al., eds. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Davidson, Lett. Math. Phys. 3, 271 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì, to appear.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deotto, E., Ghirardi, G.C. Bohmian Mechanics Revisited. Foundations of Physics 28, 1–30 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018752202576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018752202576

Keywords

Navigation