Abstract
I reply to two comments to my paper “Subjectivity and transcendental illusions in the Anthropocene,” by Johannes Schick and Melentie Pandilovski. Schick expands on the possibility that technical objects become “other” in a Levinasian sense, making use of Simondon’s three-layered structure of technical objects. His proposal is to free technical objects and install a different relationship between humankind and technology. I see two major difficulties in Schick's proposal. These difficulties are based on a number of features of current digital technology which make it difficult to enter the proposed ethical relationship with it. A first cluster of difficulties consists of the phenomena of blackboxing, the intimate interwovenness of inventing technologies and profit on all levels of the technical object, and the ownership of and control over technologies. A second cluster revolves around the impossibility of a symmetrical relationship with the hyperobject because of current technology’s hyperobject-like nature. Next I discuss Pandilovski’s comments, where I point out that phenomenology is more encompassing than the study of having conscious experiences, and that phenomenology is essentially a method, rather than a collection of results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauwens, M. and Lievens, J. (2013). De Wereld Redden. Met Peer-to-Peer Naar een Post-Kapitalistische Samenleving. [Saving the World: With Peer-to-Peer Towards a Post-Capitalist society.]. Antwerpen: Houtekiet. French translation: Michel Bauwens (avec Jean Lievens) (2015). Sauver le monde. Vers une économie post-capitaliste avec le peer-to-peer. Paris: Éditions Les Liens qui libèrent.
Boulton, E. (2016). Climate Change as a ‘Hyperobject’: A Critical Review of Timothy Morton’s Reframing Narrative. WIREs Climate Change, 5(7), 772–785.
De Preester, H. (2006). Naturalism and Transcendentalism in the Naturalization of Phenomenology. New Ideas in Psychology, 24(1), 41–62.
Flusser, V. (1983). Für eine Philosophie der Photographie. Göttingen: European Photography.
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stiegler, B. (2009). Taking Care of Youth and the Generations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Wark, M. (2004). A Hacker Manifesto. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Yeung, K. (2017). ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a Mode of Regulation by Design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 118–136.
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Informal Civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Preester, H. The object that technology is not and how we can relate to it. Found Sci 27, 581–585 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09743-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09743-4