Skip to main content
Log in

Reconceptualising Modernity for Management Studies: Exploring the Tension Between the Scientific and the Spiritual in the Age of Modernism

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporaneously, management studies have focused considerable attention on postmodernity. This engagement is premised on a particular reading of modernity and this paper identifies the frequent implication that spiritual and anti-rational aspects cannot be located in modernist experience and thus seek responses within post-modernism. However, the paper suggests that the spiritual and the anti-rational are integral to modernity through modernistic constructions in the arts. While a tension between the rational and the anti-rational within modernity is occasionally acknowledged, art studies discussed underwrite the dominance of science as illustrated particularly through Greenberg’s account of abstract art. Alternative accounts of abstract art foreground the spiritual in the lives and work of some leading artists and the Theosophy Movement during the High, Modernist period (1890 – 1930). The surfaced tensions between the scientific and the spiritual at the heart of Modernity are related to management theory and its engagement with postmodernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tony Watson Organising and Managing Work: Organisational, Managerial and Strategic Behaviour in Theory and Practice. Harlow, Essex, Financial Times/Prentice Hall 2002.

  2. Deepak Chopra The Seven Spiritual Laws of Success: A Practical Guide to the Fulfilment of Your Dreams. New York, Bantam Press 1996; Stephen Linstead ‘Time, Creativity and Culture: Introducing Bergson’, Culture and Organization, 9 (1): 2003 pp 3–13.

  3. Sarita Chawla and John Renesch (eds) Learning Organizations. Portland, Oregon, Productivity Press 1995.

  4. Dennis Heaton et al. ‘Constructs, methods, and measures for researching spirituality in organizations’ In Journal of Organizational Change 17 (1): 2004 pp 62–82.

  5. See for example: Stephen Fineman (ed) Emotion in Organizations. London, Sage Publications 1993; Yiannis Gabriel ‘The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity’, Organization Studies, 16 (3): 1995 pp 447–502; David Knights and Hugh Willmott Management Lives: Power and Identity in Work Organizations. London, Sage Publications 1999; and also Stewart Clegg, Martin Kornberger and Tyrone Pitsis, Managing and Organizations: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. London, Sage Publications 2005.

  6. Reva Brown ‘Organizational spirituality: the sceptic’s version’ In Organization 10 (2): 2003 pp 393–400.

  7. Karl Weick Sensemaking in Organisations. London, Sage Publications 1995.

  8. Krishan Kumar From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society. Oxford, Blackwell 1995 p 67.

  9. Lawrence Cahoone Postmodernism Cambridge Maas and Oxford, Blackwell 1996 p 7.

  10. Krishan Kumar From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society. Oxford, Blackwell 1995 p 67.

  11. Malcolm Bradbury and James McFarlane Modernism:1890-1930 Harmondworth Penguin 1976 p 21.

  12. Krishan Kumar op cit 1995 p 26.

  13. Clement Greenberg The Collected Essays and Criticism, 4, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press 1993 p 128.

  14. Paul Wood et al. Modernism in Dispute: Art since the Forties. New Haven and London, Yale University Press 1993 p 174.

  15. Clement Greenberg op cit 1992: p 312.

  16. Herschel Chipp (ed) Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book by Artists and Critics. Berkeley, University of California Press 1968 p 193.

  17. Ernst Gombrich The Story of Art. London, Phaidon, 1950/1995.

  18. Ernst Gombrich op cit 1950/1995 p 575.

  19. Ernst Gombrich op cit 1950/1995 p 578.

  20. Peter Washington Mme Blavatsky’s Baboon: Theosophy and the Emergence of the Western Guru. London, Secker and Warburg 1993 pp 44–5.

  21. Robert Carver ‘New Age Travellers: Review of Madame Blavatsky’s Baboon: Theosophy and the Invention of the Guru’ In New Statesman and Society, April 16 1993 p 36.

  22. Washington op cit p 25.

  23. Robert Carver op cit p 36.

  24. Robert Grogin The Bergsonian Controversy in France 1900–1914. Calgary, University of Calgary Press, 1988 p 88.

  25. Joscelyn Godwin The Theosophical Enlightenment. New York, State University of New York Press 1995 p xii.

  26. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled, 2 vols. London, Theosophical Publishing House 1877/1910.

  27. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky The Secret Doctrine: The Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy. London, Theosophical Publishing House 1893 p 23.

  28. Joscelyn Godwin The Theosophical Enlightenment. New York, State University of New York Press 1995 p 309.

  29. Peter Washington op cit 1993 p 40.

  30. Peter Washington op cit 1993 p 69.

  31. Annie Besant Popular Lectures on Theosophy. Adyar, Madras, Theosophist Office 1910.

  32. Robert Hughes The Shock of the New. London, BBC 1980 p 202.

  33. Robert Hughes op cit 1980 p 299.

  34. Anon., ‘Abstract art’s mystical heart’ Wilson Quarterly 20 (1): 1996 p 132.

  35. G Albert Aurier in the 1890s quoted in Herschel Chipp (ed) Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book by Artists and Critics. Berkeley, University of California Press 1968 p 88.

  36. Starkie quoted in John Moffitt Alchemist of the Avant-Garde: The Case of Marcel Duchamp. Albany, State University of New York Press 2003 p 38..

  37. Ernst Gombrich op cit 1950/1995 p 570.

  38. Hans Roethel Kandinsky. Oxford, Phaidon Press 1979 p 13.

  39. Hans Roethel op cit 1979 p 10.

  40. Ernst Gombrich op cit 1950/1995 p 581.

  41. Herschel Chipp op cit 1968 pp 316–7.

  42. Herschel Chipp op cit1968 p 368.

  43. Quoted by Carel Blotkamp Mondrian: The Art of Destruction. London, Reaktion Books 1994 p 110.

  44. Wassily Kandinsky Concerning the Spiritual in Art. New York, Dover Publications 1914/1977 p 1.

  45. Wassily Kandinsky op cit 1914/1977 p 17.

  46. Jelena Hahl-Koch (ed) Arnold Schoenberg, Wassily Kandinsky: Letters, Pictures and Documents. London, Faber and Faber 1984 p 145. See also John Golding Paths to the Absolute. London, Thames and Hudson 2000 p 96.

  47. Wassily Kandinsky Concerning the Spiritual in Art. New York, Dover Publications 1914/1977 p 25.

  48. Wassily Kandinsky op cit 1914/1977 p 38.

  49. Wassily Kandinsky op cit 1914/1977 p 41.

  50. Wassily Kandinsky Concerning the Spiritual in Art. New York, Dover Publications 1914/1977 p 50...

  51. Gail Levin and Marianne Lorenz Theme and Improvisation: Kandinsky and the American Avant-garde 1912–1950. Dayton, Dayton Art Institute 1992 pp 52, 88, 116.

  52. Hilton Kramer ‘Mondrian and mysticism: “my long search is over”’ In New Criterion Sept., 1995 pp 4–14.

  53. Simon Nodelman ‘Unpacking Duchamp: Art in Transit’ In Art in America, January, 2000 p 37.

  54. John Moffitt Alchemist of the Avant-Garde: The Case of Marcel Duchamp. Albany, State University of New York Press 2003.

  55. John Moffitt op cit 2003 p 39.

  56. John Moffitt op cit 2003 p 85.

  57. John Moffitt op cit 2003 p 103.

  58. John Moffitt op cit 2003 p 85.

  59. Carel Blotkamp Mondrian: The Art of Destruction. London, Reaktion Books 1994 pp 41–2.

  60. Penelope Curtis and Alan Wilkinson Barbara Hepworth: A Retrospective. London, Tate Gallery Publications 1994 p 45.

  61. quoted in Eric Shanes Constantin Brancusi. New York, Abbeville Press 1988 p 106.

  62. quoted in Eric Shanes op cit 1988 p 107.

  63. quoted in Eric Shanes op cit 1988 p 106.

  64. Eric Shanes op cit 1988 p 17.

  65. See Stewart Clegg et al ‘For Management?’ Management Learning, 37 (1): 2006 pp7- 27. Nelson Phillips ‘The Adolescence of Critical Management Studies?’ Management Learning, 37 (1): 2006 pp 29–31; Martin Parker ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ Management Learning, 37 (1): 2006 pp 39–41; Hugh Willmott ‘Pushing at an Open Door: Mystifying the CMS Manifesto’ Management Learning, 37 (1): 2006 pp 33–37.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dereli, C., Stokes, P. Reconceptualising Modernity for Management Studies: Exploring the Tension Between the Scientific and the Spiritual in the Age of Modernism. Philos. of Manag. 6, 131–139 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20086241

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20086241

Keywords

Navigation