Abstract
There are two different notions of seed (sperma) at work in the Generation of Animals: seed as the spermatic residue (perittôma), which concerns only the male and the female generative contributions, and seed as the kuêma and first mixture of the two generative contributions. The latter is a notion of seed common to plants and animals. The passage in GA I.18, 724b12–22 where Aristotle distinguishes between these two notions of seed has been mistakenly discredited as inauthentic or simply as irrelevant for understanding the seeds of animals. On the other hand, recent studies have rather focused on the seed as spermatic residue (in particular, the female contribution as seed), paying little attention to the notion of seed as kuêma. In this paper I defend the authenticity and relevance of this passage and show how understanding the notion of seed as kuêma is essential to have a complete picture of Aristotle’s account of seed. This common notion of seed makes sense of Aristotle’s otherwise puzzling use of the word “sperma” to designate the seeds of plants, the kuêma, the fertilized eggs, and the first mixture of the two generative contributions. It also proves helpful in determining what the word ‘sperma’ stands for in key passages, such as Metaph. IX.7.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle. 1942. The Generation of Animals. Edited and Translated by A.L. Peck. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
Aristotle. 1965. De Generatione Animalium. Edited by J. H. Drossaart Lulofs. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Aristotle. 1992. De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with Passages from II.1–3). Translated with Notes by David M. Balme, with a Report on Recent Work and an Additional Bibliography by Allan Gotthelf. New York: Oxford
Beere, Jonathan 2008. Doing and Being. New York: Oxford University PressBeere, Jonathan. 2008
Bolton, Robert. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” Allan Gotthelf and James G Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 120–166. New York: Cambridge University Press
Carraro, Nicola. 2017. “Aristotle’s Embryology and Ackrill’s Problem.” Phronesis 62: 274–304
Code, Alan. 1987. “Soul as Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Embryology.” Philosophical Topics 15: 51–59
Coles, Andrew. 1995. “Biomedical Models of Reproduction in the Fifth Century BC and Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.” Phronesis 40: 48–88
Connell, Sophia M. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dean-Jones, Lesley. 1994. Women’s Bodies in Classical Greek Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Freeland, Cynthia A. 1987. “Aristotle on Bodies, Matter, and Potentiality.” Allan Gotthelf and James G. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 392–407. New York: Cambridge University Press
Furth, Montgomery. 1988. Substance, Form, and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press
Gelber, Jessica. 2010. “Form and Inheritance in Aristotle’s Biology.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 183–212
Henry, Devin. 2006. “Understanding Aristotle’s Reproductive Hylomorphism.” Apeiron 39: 257–288
Lefebvre, David. 2016. “Le Sperma: Forme, Matière ou les Deux? Aristote Critique de la Double Semence.” Philosophie Antique 16: 31–62
Mayhew, Robert. 2004. The Female in Aristotle’s Biology: Reason or Rationalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Morsink, Johannes. 1982. Aristotle on the Generation of Animals: A Philosophical Study. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America
O’Connor, Scott. 2015. “The Subjects of Natural Generation in Aristotle’s Physics I.7.” Apeiron 48: 45–75
Preus, Anthony. 1975. Science and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Biological Works. New York: G. Olms
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Ribera-Martin, I. Seed (Sperma) and Kuêma in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals. J Hist Biol 52, 87–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9508-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9508-0