Skip to main content

Situating Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 437))

Abstract

This introductory essay provides a historical and cross-cultural overview of evolutionary ethics, and how it can be situated within naturalized ethics. We also situate the contributions to this volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aurobindo. (1914–1918 [2005]). The life divine. Pondicherry, India: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1844 [1994]). Vestiges of the natural history of creation and other evolutionary writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L., & Leech, B. L. (2013). Meeting at Grand Central. Understanding the social and evolutionary roots of cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2020). The challenge of evolution to religion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O., Sarkissian, H., & Wong, D. (2008). Naturalizing ethics. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology. Vol. 1. The evolution of morality: Adaptations and innateness (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., et al. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 55–130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan or the matter, forme and power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civil. London: Andrew Crooke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1739–1740 [2007]). A treatise of human nature (D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, X. (2019). Translation and transmutation: The Origin of Species in China. British Journal for the History of Science, 52(1), 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. (2006). The evolution of morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785 [1998]). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63(3), 190–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1924). Ethics. Origin and development (L. S. Friedland & J. R. Piroshnikoff, Trans.). Binghamton, NY/New York: Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1902 [1989]). Mutual aid: A factor of evolution. Montreal, QC/New York: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., et al. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1813), 20151019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (2001). The Lakota way. Stories and lessons for living. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengzi. (4rd century BCE [2008]). Mengzi. With selections from traditional commentaries (B. Van Norden, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozi. (5th–3rd c. BCE [2009]). The Mozi: A complete translation (I. Johnston, Ed.). Hong Kong, China: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigden, C. (2019). No-ought-from-is, the naturalistic fallacy and the fact/value distinction: The history of a mistake. In N. Sinclair (Ed.), The naturalistic fallacy (pp. 73–95). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rée, P. (1877). Der Ursprung der moralischen Empfindungen. Chemnitz, Germany: Ernst Schmeitzner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzinger, J. R. (2013). Dependent co-evolution: Kropotkin’s theory of mutual aid and its appropriation by Chinese Buddhists. Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal, 26, 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2010). The biological sciences can act as a ground for ethics. In F. J. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 297–315). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M., & Wilson, E. O. (1986). Moral philosophy as applied science. Philosophy, 61(236), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A. (1840 [1903]). The basis of morality (A. Bullock, Trans.). London: Swan Sonnenschein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind & Language, 27(2), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. (1876). The theory of evolution in its application to practice. Mind, 1(1), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. (1907). The methods of ethics (7th ed.). London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others. The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1855). The principles of psychology. London: Longman, Brown, Green, & Longmans.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Todes, D. P. (1989). Darwin without Malthus. The struggle for existence in Russian evolutionary thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (1527 [2014]). Questions on the Great Learning. In J. Tiwald & B. Van Norden (Eds.), Readings in later Chinese philosophy. Han dynasty to the 20th century (P. J. Ivanhoe, Trans.) (pp. 238–250). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, A. (Ed.). (2004). American Indian thought. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology. The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen De Cruz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H. (2021). Situating Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics. In: De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H. (eds) Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics. Synthese Library, vol 437. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68802-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics