Abstract
In this paper we present a generalization of Aristotle’s square to a cube, in the framework of an extended quantification theory defined within the Logic of Determination of Objects (LDO). The Aristotle’s square is an image which makes the link between quantifier operators and negation in the First Order Predicate Language (FOPL). However, the FOPL quantification is not sufficient to capture the “meaning” of all quantified expressions in natural languages. There are some expressions in natural languages which encode a quantification on typical objects. This is the reason why we want to construct a logic of objects with typical and atypical objects. The Logic of Determination of Objects (LDO) (Desclés and Pascu, Logica Univers. 5(1):75–89, 2011) is a new logic defined within the framework of Combinatory Logic (Curry and Feys, Combinatory Logic I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1958) with functional types. LDO basically deals with two fundamental classes: a class of concepts (\(\mathcal{F}\)) and a class of objects (\(\mathcal{O}\)). LDO captures two kinds of objects: typical objects and atypical objects. They are defined by the means of other primitive notions: the intension of the concept f (\(\operatorname{Int}f\)), the essence of a concept f (\(\operatorname{Ess}f\)), the expanse of the concept f (\(\operatorname{Exp}f\)), the extension of the concept f (\(\operatorname{Ext}f\)). Typical objects in \(\operatorname{Exp}f\) inherit all concepts of \(\operatorname{Int}f\); atypical objects in \(\operatorname{Exp}f\) inherit only some concepts of Intf. LDO makes use of all the above notions and organizes them into a system which is a logic of objects (applicative typed system in Curry’s sense—Curry and Feys, Combinatory Logic I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1958—with some specific operators). In LDO new quantifiers are introduced and studied. They are called star quantifiers: Π⋆ and Σ⋆ (Desclés and Guentcheva, in: M. Bőttner, W. Thűmmel (eds.), Variable-Free Semantics, pp. 210–233, Secolo, Osnabrűck, 2000). They have a connection with classical quantifiers. They are considered as the determiners of objects of \(\operatorname{Exp}f\). They are different from the usual quantifiers Π and Σ expressed in the illative Curry version (Curry and Feys, Combinatory Logic I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1958) of Frege’s quantifiers. They are defined inside the Combinatory Logical formalism (Curry and Feys, Combinatory Logic I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1958) starting from Π and Σ, by means of abstract operators of composition called combinators (Curry and Feys, Combinatory Logic I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1958). The system of four quantifiers Π, Σ, Π⋆ and Σ⋆ captures the extended quantification that means quantification on typical/atypical objects. The cube generalizing the Aristotle’s square visualizes the relations between quantifiers Π, Σ, Π⋆ and Σ⋆ and the negation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
N 1 is the functional negation, the negation of a concept [10].
- 2.
\(\operatorname{Exp}_{\tau }(\tau f)\) is the extension containing all typical objects generated from τf.
- 3.
Aτδ6, that is: \(((\forall f), f \in{\mathcal{F}})\lbrack(f (\tau f)) = \top \) iff \(\operatorname{Ext}_{\tau} (\tau f) \neq \emptyset\rbrack\).
References
Church, A.: The Calculi of Lambda Conversion. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1941)
Curry, H.B., Feys, R.: Combinatory Logic I. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1958)
Desclés, J.-P.: Implication entre concepts, la notion de typicalité. In: Travaux de linguistique et de littérature, XXIV, 1, pp. 79–102 (1986)
Desclés, J.-P.: Langages applicatifs, langues naturelles et cognition. Hermès, Paris (1990)
Desclés, J.-P.: Dialogue sur les prototypes et la typicalité. In: Denis, M., Sabah, G. (eds.) Modèles et concepts pour la science cognitive, hommage J.-F. Le Ny, pp. 139–163. Presses de l’Université de Grenoble, Grenoble (1993)
Desclés, J.-P., Cheong, K.-S.: Analyse critique de la notion de variable. Math. Sci. Hum. 173, 43–102 (2006)
Desclés, J.-P., Guentcheva, Z.: Quantification without bound variables. In: Bőttner, M., Thűmmel, W. (eds.) Variable-Free Semantics, pp. 210–233. Secolo, Osnabrűck (2000)
Desclés, J.-P., Pascu, A.: Logic of determination of objects—the meaning of variable in quantification. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 15(6), 1041–1052 (2006)
Desclés, J.-P., Pascu, A.: Logique de la détermination des objets (LDO): une logique pour l’analyse des langues naturelles. Rev. Roum. Linguist./Rom. Rev. Linguist. LII(1–2), 55–96 (2007)
Desclés, J.-P., Pascu, A.: Logic of determination of objects (LDO): how to articulate “extension” with “intension” and “objects with concepts. Logica Univers. 5(1), 75–89 (2011)
Geach, P., Black, M.: Translation from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (1891), 2nd edn. (with corrections). Oxford Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1960)
Gentzen, G.: Recherches sur la déduction logique. Traduit de l’allemand par Feys, R., Ladrière, J. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1955)
Hilbert, D., Bernays, P.: Grundlagen der Mathematik II. Springer, Berlin (1939)
Frege, G.: Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, begriffsschriftlich abgeleitet (1893). Translated and edited with an introduction by Furth, M.: Basic Laws of Arithmetic (Exposition of the System). University of California Press, Los Angeles (1967)
Frege, G.: Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle (1879). Version francaise par Besson, C.: l’Idéographie. Vrin, Paris (1999)
Montague, R.: The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In: Thomason, R.H. (ed.) Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, New Haven (1974)
Rosch, E.: Principles of categorization. In: Cognition and Categorization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1978)
Pascu, A.: Logique de Détermination d’Objets: concepts de base et mathématisation en vue d’une modélisation objet. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris-Sorbonne, Paris (2001)
Pascu, A.: Les objets dans la représentation des connaissances. Application aux processus de catégorisation en informatique et sciences humaines. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Paris-Sorbonne, Paris (2006)
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to our reviewers for their interesting remarks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Basel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Desclés, JP., Pascu, A. (2012). The Cube Generalizing Aristotle’s Square in Logic of Determination of Objects (LDO). In: Béziau, JY., Jacquette, D. (eds) Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Studies in Universal Logic. Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-0378-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-0379-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)