Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The cultural ecology of development: Ten precepts for survival

  • Articles
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses a cultural ecology of development approach to critique existing models of development. The critique identifies existing models as running counter to ecological and biological imperatives, placing an over-emphasis on growth as the solution to development, and resulting in considerable cultural wastage. An argument is made that many of the attempts to construct an alternative development paradigm can be grouped within the cultural ecology of development approach. Ten precepts that will enhance the long-term survivability of the earth are proposed. The final portion of the paper looks at how compatible current trends in thinking about development are with these ten precepts and assesses the prospects for adoption of these precepts in an alternative development paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Richard N. 1970Crucifixion by Power. Austin, Texas: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 “Population and Natural Selection in the Micro-Macro Perspective.” In Billie R. DeWalt and Pertti J. Pelto eds.Micro and Macro Levels of Analysis in Anthropology: Issues in Theory and Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. pp. 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agency for International Development 1983 Environmental and Natural Resource Aspects of Development Assistance: Policy Determination, PD-6, April 26, Washington: U.S.A.I.D.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, Robert L. 1983Banking on the Poor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkin, David 1983 “The Internationalization of Capital and the Spatial Organization of Agriculture in Mexico.” In Frank Moulaert and Patricia Salinas, eds.Regional Analysis and the New International Division of Labor. Boston: Kluwer-Nifhoff Publishing, pp. 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, John 1969Northern Plainsmen: Adaptive Strategy and Agrarian Life. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976The Ecological Transition. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Human Ecology as Human Behavior: A Normative Anthropology of Resource Use and Abuse.” In Irwin Altman, Amos Rapoport, and Joachim Wohlwill eds.Human Behavior and Environment. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 243–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth 1977 “Twelve Friendly Quarrels with Johan Galtung.”Journal of Peace Research 14:75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Kenneth 1974 “Ecological Effects of Current Development Processes in Less Developed Countries.” In Anthony Vann and Paul Rogers eds.,Human Ecology and World Development. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Herman 1977Steady-State Economics. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt, Billie 1978 “Appropriate Technology in Rural Mexico: Antecedents and Consequences of an Indigenous Peasant Innovation.”Technology and Culture 19:32–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 “Alternative Adaptive Strategies in a Mexican Ejido: A New Perspective on Modernization and Development.”Human Organization 38:134–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 “The Big Macro Connection.”Culture and Agriculture. 14:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “The Cattle Are Eating the Forest.”Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 39:18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 “International Development Paths and Policies: The Cultural Ecology of Development.”The Rural Sociologist 4:255–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985a “Mexico's Second Green Revolution.”Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 1:29–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985b “Microcosmic and Macrocosmic Processes of Agrarian Change in Southern Honduras: The Cattle Are Eating the Forest.” In Billie R. DeWalt and Pertti J. Pelto eds.Micro and Macro Levels of Analysis in Anthropology: Issues in Theory and Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. pp. 165–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985c “Anthropology, Sociology and Farming Systems Research.”Human Organization 44:106–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diwan, Romesh and Dennis Livingston 1979Alternative Development Strategies and Appropriate Technology: Science Policy for an Equitable World Order. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubos, Rene 1968So Human an Animal. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980The Wooing of Earth: New Perspectives on Man's Use of Nature. New York: Scribner's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. 1980 “Paradigmatic Change in Social Science: The Decline of Human Exemptionalism and the Emergence of an Ecological Paradigm.”American Behavioral Scientist (September/October).

  • Dumont, René 1981Le Mal-Développement en Amérique Latine. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

  • Ehrlich, P. R., A. H. Ehrlich, and J. R. Holdren 1977Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment. San Francisco: Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmanuel, Arghiri 1972Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade. New York: Monthly Review.

  • Forster, Nancy and Howard Handelman 1985 “Food Production and Distribution in Cuba: The Impact of the Revolution.” In, John C. Super and Thomas C. Wright eds.Food, Politics, and Society in Latin America. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan 1978 “Grand Designs on a Collision Course.”International Development Review 20 (3/4):43–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan, Peter O'Brien and Roy Preiswerk (eds.) 1980Self-Reliance, A Strategy for Development. London: Bogle-L'Ouverture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, Raoul and Escudero, José Carlos 1982The Constant Catastrophe. New York and Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas 1971The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Marshall I. 1970 “The Convergence of Environmental Disruption.”Science 170:37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, Edward et al. 1972 “A Blueprint for Survival.”The Ecologist 2(1):1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, Denis 1977The Uncertain Promise: Value Conflicts in Technology Transfer. New York: IDOC/Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Development Experts: The One-Eyed Giants.”World Development 8:481–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Obstacles to World Development: An Ethical Reflection.”World Development 11:609–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, L. 1981 “The Cultural Ecology of Economic Development.”Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71:220–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Jules 1963Culture Against Man. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogvelt, Ankie 1977The Sociology of Developing Societies. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanties Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982The Third World in Global Development. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, Ivan 1977Medical Nemesis. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, Jasper, Mark Sullivan, and Barbara Lenkerd 1981Social Analysis of AID Projects: A Review of the Experience. Washington: U.S.A.I.D.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization 1977Employment, Growth and Basic Needs: A One-World Problem. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jequier, Nicolas 1976Appropriate Technology: Problems and Promises. Paris: Development Centre of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottak, Conrad 1985 “When People Don't Come First: Some Sociological Lessons from Completed Projects.” In Michael M. Cernea ed.,Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 325–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappé, Frances Moore and Joseph Collins 1977Food First: Beyond the Myth of Scarcity. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappé, Frances Moore, Joseph Collins and David Kinley 1980Aid as Obstacle. San Francisco: Institute for Food and Development Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, Ervin, et al. 1977Goals for Mankind. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, Michael 1984 “Strategies for the Control of Malnutrition and the Influence of the Nutritional Sciences.”Food and Nutrition 10:5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, Alfred J. 1922 “Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 8.

  • Mansour, Fawzy 1979 “Third World Revolt and Self-Reliant Auto-Centered Strategy of Development.” In Kim Q. Hill, ed.Toward a New Strategy for Development. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, William 1980The Poverty of Nations: The Political Economy of Hunger and Population. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Colin 1981 “The Threat to One Million Species.”Science 214:1105–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophuls, William 1977Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity. W. H. Freeman: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelto, Gretel and Pertti Pelto 1976The Human Adventure. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirages, Dennis 1983 “The Ecological Perspective and the Social Sciences.”International Studies Quarterly 27:243–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiswerk, Roy 1981Mal-Developpement, Suisse-Monde. Geneva: Le-Centre Europe - Tiers Monde (CETIM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reutlinger, Shlomo and H. Alderman 1980 “The Prevalence of Calorie-Deficient Diets in Developing Countries.”World Development 8:399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, Jeremy with Ted Howard 1980Entropy: A New World View. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, Gilbert 1980 “Alternative Strategies to Development.”International Development Review 22 (2/3):102–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Ignacy 1974 “Ecodevelopment.”Ceres Nov.–Dec.:8–12.

  • 1980 “Ecodesarrollo: Concepto, Aplicacion, Implicaciones.”Comercio Exterior 30:718–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya 1984 “Food Battles: Conflicts in the Access to Food.”Food and Nutrition 10:81–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaner, William, P. F. Phillipp, and W. R. Schmehl 1982Farming Systems Research and Development. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprout, Harold and Margaret Sprout 1971Toward a Politics of the Planet Earth. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Bruce 1981Helping Ourselves: Local Solutions to Global Problems. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.N. Commission for Social Development 1975 Report of the 24th Session, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 58th Session, Supplement #3, U.N. Document No. E/CN.5/525, paragraph 4.

  • Uphoff, Norman 1985 “Fitting Projects to People.” In Michael M. Cernea ed.,Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 359–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, Norman, John M. Cohen, and Arthur A. Goldsmith 1977Feasibility and Application of Rural Development Participation: A State of the Art Paper. Ithaca: Cornell University Rural Development Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Richard G. 1973Poverty and Progress: An Ecological Perspective on Economic Development. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Eric 1982Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank 1980Meeting Basic Needs: An Overview. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Billie R. DeWalt is Professor and Chair in the Department of Anthropology and holds joint appointments in the Department of Sociology and the Patterson School of Diplomacy at the University of Kentucky. Among his publications are the booksModernization in a Mexican Ejido: A Study in Economic Adaptation (Cambridge University Press) andMicro and Macro Levels of Analysis in Anthropology: Issues in Theory and Research (Westview Press), the latter co-edited with Pertti J. Pelto. He has done research on cultural ecology, agrarian issues and food systems in Mexico, Honduras, and Costa Rica. He is currently writing a book with the economist David Barkin on the political economy of food and agriculture in Mexico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeWalt, B.R. The cultural ecology of development: Ten precepts for survival. Agric Hum Values 5, 112–123 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217182

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217182

Keywords

Navigation