Skip to main content
Log in

Computational Modelling of Protein Interactions: Energy Minimization for the Refinement and Scoring of Association Decoys

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prediction of protein–protein interactions based on independently obtained structural information for each interacting partner remains an important challenge in computational chemistry. Procedures where hypothetical interaction models (or decoys) are generated, then ranked using a biochemically relevant scoring function have been garnering interest as an avenue for addressing such challenges. The program PatchDock has been shown to produce reasonable decoys for modeling the association between pig alpha-amylase and the VH-domains of camelide antibody raised against it. We designed a biochemically relevant method by which PatchDock decoys could be ranked in order to separate near-native structures from false positives. Several thousand steps of energy minimization were used to simulate induced fit within the otherwise rigid decoys and to rank them. We applied a partial free energy function to rank each of the binding modes, improving discrimination between near-native structures and false positives. Sorting decoys according to strain energy increased the proportion of near-native decoys near the bottom of the ranked list. Additionally, we propose a novel method which utilizes regression analysis for the selection of minimization convergence criteria and provides approximation of the partial free energy function as the number of algorithmic steps approaches infinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrusier N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2007) FireDock: fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Proteins 69(1):139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BioInfo3D (2007) About PatchDock. http://bioinfo3d.cs.tau.ac.il/PatchDock/patchdock.html. Cited 1 Oct 2007

  • Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW, Kimura SR, Vajda S (2000) Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein–protein docking. Proteins 40(3):525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherfils J, Duquerroy S, Janin J (1991) Protein–protein recognition analyzed by docking simulation. Proteins 11(4):271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein M, Katchalski-Katzir E (2004) On proteins, grids, correlations, and docking. C R Biol 327(5):409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Bioinformatics Institute (2002) CAPRI round 2 website. http://capri.ebi.ac.uk/round2/round2.html. Cited 1 Oct 2007

  • Huang N, Jacobson MP (2007) Physics-based methods for studying protein–ligand interactions. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 10(3):325–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar Y, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Halperin I, Oron A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2005) Approaching the CAPRI challenge with an efficient geometry-based docking. Proteins 60(2):217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machius M, Vertesy L, Huber R, Wiegand G (1996) Carbohydrate and protein-based inhibitors of porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase: structure analysis and comparison of their binding characteristics. J Mol Biol 260(3):409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashiach E, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Andrusier N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2008) FireDock: a web server for fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Web Server issue):W229–W232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 25(13):1656–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Polak V et al (2003) Taking geometry to its edge: fast unbound rigid (and hinge-bent) docking. Proteins 52(1):107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2005a) PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 33(Web Server issue):W363–W367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2005b) Geometry-based flexible and symmetric protein docking. Proteins 60(2):224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senn HM, Thiel W (2007) QM/MM studies of enzymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 11(2):182–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID (1991) Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 221(1):327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totrov M, Abagyan R (1994) Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6 A accuracy. Nat Struct Biol 1(4):259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli AM et al (2006) A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J Med Chem 49(20):5912–5931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng Z, Vajda S, Delisi C (1996) Prediction of protein complexes using empirical free energy functions. Protein Sci 5(4):614–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). We would like to thank the High Performance Computing (HPC) Resource Committee of the University of Manitoba for granting us access to the Polaris HPC facility. We would also like to thank Jonatan Aronsson for valuable technical support and assistance in setting up our software on Polaris and Dr. Joe D. O’Neil for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Dibrov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dibrov, A., Myal, Y. & Leygue, E. Computational Modelling of Protein Interactions: Energy Minimization for the Refinement and Scoring of Association Decoys. Acta Biotheor 57, 419–428 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-009-9085-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-009-9085-x

Keywords

Navigation