This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
1975
Hadjduk, Z.: 1975, ‘Review of Stegmüller (1973)’,Roczniki Filozoficzne 23(3), 192–193.
1976
Gibbins, P.: 1976, ‘Use-value and Exchange-value’,Theory and Decision 7, 171–179.
Kraiker, C.: 1976, ‘Zum Problem von Theorien und ihrer Anwendung in der Psychologie’, in P. Gottwald and C. Kraiker (eds.),Zum Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis in der Psychologie, GVT, München.
Scheibe, E.: 1976, ‘Zur Logik des Theorienvergleichs’,Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 19, 13–25.
1977
Düsberg, K. J.: 1977, ‘Stegmüller über “wissenschaftliche Revolutionen”’,Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 8, 331–341.
Werth, R.: 1977,Theoretische Begriffe der physiologischen Psychologie, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Westmeyer, H.: 1977, ‘Verhaltenstherapie: Anwendung von Verhaltenstheorien oder kontrollierte Praxis’, in H. Westmeyer and N. Hoffmann (eds.),Verhaltenstherapie:Grundlegende Texte, Hoffmann und Campe, Hamburg, pp. 187–203.
Westmeyer, H.: 1977a, ‘Psychologie und Wissenschaftstheorie’, in K. A. Schneewind (ed.),Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen der Psychologie, Reinhardt, München, pp. 71–92.
1979
Hadjduk, Z.: 1979, ‘O pewnej wersji semantycznego ujecia teorii fizykalnej’,Summarium. Sprawozdania Towarzystwa Naukowego KUL 8(28), 31–69.
Kaiser, E.: 1979,Neopositivistische Philosophie im XX. Jahrhundert, Berlin.
MacKinnon, E.: 1979, ‘Scientific Realism: The New Debates’,Philosophy of Science 46, 501–532.
Mühlhölzer, F.: 1979,Versuch einer strukturalistischen Rekonstruktion der klassischen Elektrodynamik, Seminar für Philosophie, Logik und Wissenschaftstheorie, Universität München.
1980
Hadjduk, Z.: 1980, ‘Semantyczne ujecie struktury i poznawczego wartosciowania teorii fizykalnych’, Vol. I.Roczniki Filozoficzne 28(3), 97–118.
Jodkowski, K.: 1980, ‘Spór o kryterium teoretycznosci pojec’,Studia Filozoficzne 3, 59–77.
Kraiker, C.: 1980,Psychoanalyse, Behaviorismus, Handlungstheorie, Kindler, München.
1981
Jodkowski, K.: 1981, ‘Podstawowe idea J. D. Sneeda nied zaniowej konceptii teorii’,Studia Filoz 4, 17–31.
Schmidt, H.-J.: 1981, ‘Stable Axioms in Physical Theories’, in A. Hartkämper and H.-J. Schmidt (eds.),Structure and Approximation in Physical Theories, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 39–53.
1982
Balzer, W.: 1982,Empirische Theorien: Modelle, Strukturen, Beispiele, Vieweg, Braunschweig.
Westmeyer, H.: 1982, ‘Wissenschaftstheoretische Aspekte der Feldforschung’, in J. L. Patry (ed.),Feldforschung. Methoden und Probleme sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung unter natürlichen Bedingungen, H. Huber/BRO, Bern.
1983
Aftowicz-Bielecki, M.: 1983, ‘Structure and Application of Physical Theories: Comments on Three Methodological Approaches’, inAbstracts of the 7th International Congress on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3, Sect. 6, Hutteger OHG, Salzburg, pp. 13–16.
Baltas, A.: 1983, ‘Towards the Science of the History of Physics’, inAbstracts of the 7th International LMPS-Congress on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3, Sect. 6, pp. 171–194.
Kuipers, Th.: 1983, ‘Methodological Rules and Truth’,Abstracts of the 7th LMPS-Congress on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3, Sec. 6, Salzburg, pp. 122–125.
1984
Edelson, M.: 1984,Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis, The University of Chicago, Chicago.
Falguera López, J. L.: 1984, ‘El ‘status’ ontológico de los términos teóricos conforme al ‘enunciado Ramsey’ y al ‘enunciado Ramsey-Sneed’’,Agora 4, 41–55.
Finke, P. and S. J. Schmidt (eds.): 1984,Analytische Literaturwissenschaft, Vieweg, Braunschweig.
Garrido Garrido, J.: 1984, ‘Ontología general y particular: compatibilidad con las ciencias como criterio regulativo en la construcción de ontologías’, in A. Hidalgo and J. Velarde (eds.),Actas del II Congreso de Teoría y metodología de las ciencias II, 29–31.
Gracia, J. J. E. et al. (eds.): 1984,Philosophical Analysis in Latin America, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hadjduk, Z.: 1984, ‘Kontrowersyjnosc strukturalizmu Wolfganga Stegmüllera’, The Controversial Character of Wolfgang Stegmüller's Structuralism,Roczniki Filozoficzne 32(3), 127–147, (in Polish).
Jonkisz, A.: 1984, ‘Zagadnienie postepu naukowego w ujeciu strukturalistycznym’, The Structuralist Approach of Scientific Progress,Roczniki Filozoficzne 32(3), 149–172, (in Polish).
Koster, J.: 1984,Formal Rhythmics, dissertation, Leiden.
Kuipers, Th.: 1984, ‘Empirische mogelijkheden: Sleutelbegrip van de wetenschapsfilosofie’,Kennis en Methode 3, 240–263.
Kuipers, Th.: 1984a, ‘Approaching the Truth with the Rule of Success’, in P. Weingartner and C. Pühringer (eds.), Philosophy of Science — History of Science, Selection 7th LMPS Salzburg 1983,Philosophia Naturalis 21(2/4), 244–253.
López Cerezo, J. A.: 1984a, ‘Observaciones acerca de los conceptos de inconmensurabilidad en la aproximación estructuralista de las teorías’,Millars 11(3/4), 81–92.
López Cerezo, J. A.: 1984b, ‘Review of Stegmüller (1973)’,Investigación y Ciencia 97, 121–123.
Peczenik, A. et al. (eds.): 1984,Theory of Legal Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Westmeyer, H.: 1984, ‘Von den Schwierigkeiten, ein Behaviorist zu sein’, in H. Lenk (ed.),Handlungstheorien — interdisziplinär, Vol. 3, Verhaltenswissenschaftliche und psychologische Handlungstheorien, Fink, München.
Zeidler, P.: 1984, ‘O historyczno-pragmatycznej relatywizacji pojec w koncepcji J. D. Sneeda’,Studia Metodologiczne 23, Univ. A. Mickiewicza, Poznan, pp. 3–18.
1985
Mattesich, R.: 1985, ‘Forschungsprogramme und Paradigmen im Rechnungswesen unter Betonung der Agency-Informationsanalyse’, in W. Ballwieser and K. H. Berger (eds.),Information und Wirtschaftlichkeit, Wiesbaden, pp. 677–714.
1986
Alvarez, F.: 1986, ‘Estructura y función de la ley del valor: un principio-guía para la economia política’, in S. Alvarez, F. Broncano and M. A. Quintanilla (eds.),Actas del I Simposio Hispano- Mexicano de Filosofía, Vol 1, Universidad de Salamanca, pp. 374–389.
Costa, A.: 1986, ‘Perspectivas para un análisis metacientífico de las teorías de la econometría empírica’, inActes del IV Congrés Catalá de Lògica 23/24 de Febrero 1985, Universidad politécnica de Barcelona, Universidad de Barcelona, pp. 47–60.
Detel, W.: 1986, ‘Empiristische Thesen zum Verhältnis von Theorie und Erfahrung’, in Zentrum für Philosophische Grundlagen der Wissenschaften (ed.),Theorie und Empirie. Schriftenreihe, Vol. 5, Bremen N.d., pp. 29–53.
Garrido Garrido, J.: 1986, ‘Estructura de las teorías físicas: aspectos en que pueden considerarse las teorías como un todo’, in S. Alvárez, F. Broncano and M. A. Quintanilla (eds.),Actas del I Simposio Hispano-Mexicano de Filosofía, Vol. I, Universidad de Salamanca, pp. 129–149.
Nierlich, E.: 1986, ‘Was heilβt es, eine empirisch-wissenschaftliche Theorie zu konstruieren?’,Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XVII(2), 295–314.
1987
Acero, J. J. and T. Calvo Martínez (eds.): 1987,Symposium Quine, Universidad de Granada, Granada.
Balzer, W.: 1987, ‘Reference and the Development of Theories’, in P. Weingartner, G. Schurz (eds.),Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology. Proceedings of the 11th International Wittgenstein Symposium 1986, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 213–224.
Gärdenfors, P.: 1987, ‘Sneed's Reconstruction of the Structure and Dynamic of Theories’, in B. Hansson (ed.),After Kuhn: Method or Anarchy, Doxa, Lund.
Hamminga, B.: 1987, ‘Theory Development: Mathematical Physics versus Mathematical Economics’, in P. Weingartner and G. Schurz (eds.),Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology. Proceedings of the 11th International Wittgenstein Symposium 1986, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 271–273.
Jonkisz, A.: 1987, ‘Pojecie postepu wedlug niektórych wspölczesnych filozofów (K. R. Popper, T. S. Kuhn, I. Lakatos, L. Laudan, J. D. Sneed)’, The concept of progress according to some contemporary philosophers,Ruch Filozoficzny 44(3–4), 286–292.
Kuipers, Th. (ed.): 1987, ‘What is closer-to-the-truth? A Parade of Approaches to Truthlikeness’,Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 10, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 254pp.
Kuipers, Th. (ed.): 1987a, ‘A Structuralist Approach to Truthlikeness’. in Th. Kuipers (ed.), pp. 79–99.
Kuipers, Th. (ed.): 1987b, ‘Truthlikeness of Stratified Theories’. in Th. Kuipers (ed.), pp. 177–186.
Kuipers, Th.: 1987c, ‘Truthlikeness and the Correspondence Theory of Truth’,Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology, Proceedings of the 11th Wittgenstein Symposium 1986, Wenen, pp. 171–176.
Mattessich, R.: 1987, ‘An Applied Scientist's Search for a Methodological Framework: An Attempt to Apply Lakatos' Research Programmes, Stegmüller's Theory Nets and Bunge's Family of Research Fields to Accounting Theory’, in P. Weingartner and G. Schurz (eds.),Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology. Proceedings of the 11th International Wittgenstein Symposium 1986, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 243–262.
Stachowiak, H.: 1987, ‘Interlinguistische Theorie im “non-statement view”’,Human Kybernetik 29, 11–18.
Terton, G.: 1987, ‘Review of Stegmüller 1973’,History and Philosophy of Logic 8, 110–113.
Van Looke, P.: 1987, ‘The Structure of Physical Knowledge: An Approach Inspired in Continental Philosophy of Science’,Communication and Cognition 20, 423–450.
Westermann, R.: 1987, ‘Zur Anwendung der strukturalistischen Theorienkonzeption in der Psychologie’, in M. Amelang (ed.),Bericht über den 35. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Vol. II, Göttingen, Hogrefe, pp. 169–178.
Westmeyer, H.: 1987, ‘Zum Problem des empirischen Gehalts psychologischer Theorien’, in J. Brandstädter (ed.),Struktur und Erfahrung in der psychologischen Forschung, Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 35–70.
Westmeyer, H., Hannemann, J., Nell, V., Volkel, U. and Winkelmann, K.: 1987, ‘Eine Monotheory-Multimethod Analyse: Pladoyer für einen deduktivistischen Multiplismus,Diagnostica 33, 227–242.
Zvigljanic, V. A.: 1987, ‘Theoretical Structures of Knowledge in non-empirical Versions of Western Philosophy of Science’,Vosprosy Filosofii 2, 42–53, (in Russian).
1988
Baltas, A.: 1988, ‘On the Structure of Physics as a Science’, in D. Batens and van Bendegem (eds.),Theory and Experiment, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 207–225.
Balzer, W.: 1988, ‘Holismo y medición’, Revised version of Balzer, in E. Villanueva (ed.),Primer Simposio Internacional de Filosofía, Vol. II, UNAM, Mexico, pp. 55–73.
Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U. and Sneed, J. D.: 1988, ‘Discussion on Balzer and Sneed (1988)’, in E. Villanueva (ed.),Primer Simposio Internacional de Filosofía, UNAM, Mexico, pp. 83–85.
Burgin, M. S. and Kuznetsov, V. I.: 1988, ‘The Structure-Nominative Reconstruction of Scientific Knowledge’,Epistemología XI, 235–254.
Cadevall i Soler, M.: 1988,La estructura de la teoría de la evolución, Publicacions de la Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra.
Echeverría, J.: 1988, ‘Unidad de la ciencia y construcción estructural’, in W. J. González (ed.),Aspectos metodológicos de la investigación científica. Un enfoque multidisciplinar, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, p. 302.
García de la Sienra, A.: 1988, ‘Axiomatic Foundations of the Marxian Theory of Value’,Erkenntnis 29, 299–342.
García de la Sienra, A.: 1988a, ‘Review of W. Balzer, C. U. Moulines and J. D. Sneed: An Architectonic for Science’,Theoria LIV, 73–78.
García de la Sienra, A.: 1988b, ‘Comment on Sneed (1988)’, in E. Villanueva (ed.),Primer Simposio Internacional de Filosofía, Vol. II, UNAM, Mexico, pp. 41–54.
García de la Sienra, A.: 1988c, ‘Crítica de la filosofía empirista de la ciencia’,Arbor 510, 67–84.
Hettema, H. and Th. Kuipers: 1988, ‘The Periodic Table — its Formalization, Status, and Relation to Atomic Theory’,Erkenntnis 28, 387–408.
Holling, H.: 1988,Wahrscheinlichkeitsmodelle und empirische Analysen zur Beanspruchung durch Systemresponsezeiten, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Ibarra, A.: 1988, ‘Programa estrukturala zientziaren filosofian’, in A. Ibarra et al. (eds.),Filosofía eta Zientzia, UEU, Bilbao, pp. 57–82.
Jonkisz, A.: 1988, ‘Review of C. Dilworth, Scientific Progress. A Study Concerning the Nature of Relation Between Successive Scientific Theories’,Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 1, 163–174.
Kuipers, Th.: 1988, ‘Structuralistische explicatie van dialectische begrippen’,Filosofiedag Maastricht 1987, Eburon, Delft, pp. 191–197.
Kuipers, Th.: 1988, ‘Cognitive Patterns in the Empirical Sciences: Examples of Cognitive Studies of Science’,Communication and Cognition 21(3/4), 319–341.
Lorenzano, C. J.: 1988,La estructura del conocimiento científico, Zavalía, Buenos Aires.
Marcou, P. and Balzer, W.: 1988, ‘Dichtung, Mythos, Wissenschaft’,Erkenntnis 29, 201–225.
Mattesich, R.: 1988, ‘Un examen científico aplicado para una estructura metodológica’,Teuken 3, 273–291.
Moulines, C. U.: 1988a, ‘Epistemología’, in R. Reyes (ed.),Terminología científico-social, Anthropos, Barcelona, pp. 347–350.
Moulines, C. U.: 1988b, ‘Comment on Balzer (1988)’, in E. Villanueva (ed.),Primer Simposio Internacional de Filosofía, Vol. II, UNAM, Mexico, pp. 75–82.
Mühlhölzer, F.: 1988, ‘Ununterscheidbarkeit und intertheoretische Relationen’,Conceptus XXII 57, 107–130.
Pearce, D.: 1988, ‘The Problem of Incommensurability: A Critique of Two Instrumentalist Approaches’, in I. Hronszky, M. Fehér and B. Dajka (eds.),Scientific Knowledge Socialized, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 108, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 385–398.
Rolleri, J. L.: 1988, ‘Review of J. G. Flematti Alcalde (1984)’,Crítica 20(58), 119–122.
Sneed, J. D.: 1988, ‘La estructura lógica de la teoría bayesiana de las decisiones’, revised version of Sneed (1982), in E. Villanueva (ed.),Primer Simposio Internacional de Filosofía, Vol. II, UNAM, Mexico, pp. 9–39.
Westermann, R.: 1988, ‘Structuralist Reconstruction of Psychological Research: Cognitive Dissonance’,German Journal of Psychology 12, 218–231.
Westmeyer, H.: 1988, ‘Anforderungen an den psychologischen Forscher: Was dürfen wir verlangen?’, in N. Groeben, W. Keil and U. Piontkowski (eds.),Zukunfts-Gestalt — Wunsch-Psychologie, Aschendorff, Münster, pp. 13–37.
1989
Baltas, A.: 1989, ‘Louis Althusser and Joseph D. Sneed: A Strange Encounter in Philosophy of Science’, in K. Gavroglu, Y. Goudaroulis and P. Nicolacopoulos (eds.),Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 215–225.
Balzer, W.: 1989, ‘On Incommensurability’, in K. Gavroglu, Y. Goudaroulis and P. Nicolacopoulos (eds.),Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 215–225.
Balzer, W. and Marcou, P.: 1989, ‘A Reconstruction of Sigmund Freud's Early Theory of the Unconsciousness’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.), pp. 13–31.
Balzer, W. and Haendler, E.-W.: 1989, ‘Ordinary Least Squares as a Method of Measurement’,Erkenntnis 30, 129–146.
Balzer, W., Lauth, B. and Zoubek, G.: 1989, ‘A Static Theory of Reference in Science’,Synthese 79, 319–360.
Bartelborth, Th.: 1989, ‘Is Bohr's Model of the Atom Inconsistent?’ in P. Weingartner and G. Schurz (eds.),Reports of the 13th International Wittgenstein-Symposium 1988 — Philosophy and Natural Science. Borderline Questions, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 220–223.
Bartelborth, Th.: 1989a, ‘Kann es rational sein, eine inkonsistente Theorie zu akzeptieren? — Eine Untersuchung zum frühen Bohrschen Atommodell’,Philosophia Naturalis 26(1), 91–120.
Bauer, K.: 1989,Das strukturalistische Theorienkonzept — ein Computermodell zu den intendierten Anwendungen einer Theorie der Geometrie, unpublished Master's thesis, Seminar für Philosophie, Logik und Wissenschaftstheorie, Universität München, München.
Bravo Juega, A.: 1989,Problemas en la aplicación del estructuralismo a la economía, doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.
Carrier, M.: 1989, ‘Circles Without Circularity’, in J. R. Brown and J. Mittelstrass (eds.),An Intimate Relation, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Diederich, W.: 1989, ‘Realität und Modell. “Semantischer” und “strukturalistischer” Ansatz in der Wissenschaftstheorie”’,Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 14(3), 1–14.
Diederich, W.: 1989a, ‘The Development of Marx's Economic Theory’,Erkennntis 30, 147–164.
Diederich, W.: 1989b, ‘The Development of Structuralism. A Re-evaluation on the Occasion of W. Stegmüller's “Theorie und Erfahrung”’, Part 3 (1986),Erkenntnis 30, 363–386.
Fasching, G.: 1989,Die empirisch-wissenschaftliche Sicht, Springer Verlag, Wien/New York.
Fraassen, B. van: 1989,Laws and Symmetry, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gähde, U.: 1989, ‘Bridge-Structures and the Borderline between the Internal and External History of Science’, in K. Gavroglu, Y. Goudaroulis and P. Nicolacopoulos (eds.),Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 215–225.
Gadenne, V.: 1989, ‘Zur Interpretation der strukturalistischen Auffassung über die Prüfbarkeit von Theorien. Bemerkungen zum Beitrag von Horst Struve’,Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 20, 146–147.
Gavroglu, K. et al.: (eds.): 1989,Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientiflc Change, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Hamminga, B.: 1989, ‘Sneed Versus Nowak: An Illustration in Economics’,Erkenntnis 30, 247–265.
Heise, E. and Westermann, R.: 1989, ‘Anderson's Theory of Cognitive Architecture (ACT*): Towards a Structuralist Reconstruction of Some Important Theory-Elements’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.), pp. 103–127.
Holling, H. and Suck, R.: 1989, ‘Interruption of Action and Stress: A Structuralist Approach’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.), pp. 187–202.
Janssen, M. C. W.: 1989, ‘Structuralist Reconstructions of Classical and Keynesian Macroeconomics’,Erkenntnis 30, 165–181.
Janssen, M. C. W. and Kuipers, Th. A. F.: 1989, ‘Stratification of General Equilibrium Theory: A Synthesis of Reconstructions’,Erkenntnis 30, 183–205.
Kuipers, Th. A. F.: 1989, ‘How to Explain the Success of the Natural Sciences’, in P. Weingartner and G. Schurz (eds.),Reports of the 13th International Wittgenstein-Symposium 1988 — Philosophy and Natural Science. Borderline Questions, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 318–322.
Kuokkanen, M.: 1989,Critical Studies in the Structuralist Theory of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Kuokkanen, M.: 1989a, ‘Structuralism as a Method of Theory Construction: The Example of the Social Psychological Role Conflict Theory’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.), pp. 129–144.
Lauth, B.: 1989, ‘Reference Problems in Stoichiometry’,Erkenntnis 30, 339–362.
Leroux, J.: 1989, ‘Review of Stegmüller II/3 (1986)’,Dialogue 28, 677–682.
Moulines, C. U.: 1989, ‘The Emergence of a Research Programme in Classical Thermodynamics’, in K. Gavroglu, Y. Goudaroulis and P. Nicolacopoulos (eds.),Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 111–121.
Moulines, C. U.: 1989a, ‘Structuralism and Holism in Philosophy of Science’, in P. Weingartner and G. Schurz (eds.),Reports of the 13th International Wittgenstein-Symposium 1988 — Philosophy and Natural Science. Borderline Questions, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 354–358.
Moulines, C. U.: 1989b, ‘¿Hay una filosofía de la ciencia en el último Wittgenstein?’,Theoria IV(11), 327–342.
Moulines, C. U. and Torretti, R.: 1989, ‘Extractos de una correspondencia’,Diálogos 53, 123–137.
Nowak, L.: 1989, ‘On the (Idealizational) Structure of Economic Theories’,Erkenntnis 30, 225–246.
Otero, M. 1989, ‘Comment on Sneed (1989)’, in E. Villanueva (ed.),Tercer Simposio Internacional de Filosofía, Vol. I, UNAM, Mexico, pp. 135–138.
Pearce, D.: 1989, ‘Translation, Reduction and Commensurability: A Note on Schroeder-Heister and Schaefer’,Philosophy of Science 56, 158–164.
Peris Viñé, L. M.: 1989,La estructura lógica de la Teoría Estándar de la lingüística, doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Granada, Granada.
Sadovsky, V.: 1989, Models of Scientific Knowledge’, in H. R. Brown and J. Mittelstraß (eds.),Models of Scientific Knowledge, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 391–404.
Schlapp, Th.: 1989, ‘Theorienstrukturen und Rechtsdogmatik. Ansätze zu einer strukturalistischen Sicht juristischer Theoriebildung’, inSchriften zur Rechtstheorie, Vol. 138, Duncker und Humblot, Berlin.
Schroeder-Heister, P. and Schaefer, F.: 1989, ‘Reduction, Representation and Commensurability of Theories’,Philosophy of Science 56, 130–157.
Sneed, J. D.: 1989, ‘Micro-Economic Models of Problem Choice in Basic Science’,Erkenntnis 30, 207–224.
Sneed, J. D.: 1989a, ‘Machine Models for the Growth of Knowledge: Theory Nets in PROLOG’, in K. Gavroglu, Y. Goudaroulis and P. Nicolacopoulos (eds.),Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientiflc Change, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 245–267.
Sneed, J. D.: 1989b, ‘Los límites del realismo científico’, revised version of Sneed (1983), in E. Villanueva (ed.),Tercer Simposio Internacional de Filosofía’, Vol. I, UNAM, Mexico, pp. 83–119.
Stephan, E.: 1989, ‘A Net of Psychological Utility Theories’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.), pp. 63–102.
Struve, H.: 1989, ‘Empirische Geometrie’,Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 20, 325–339.
Weingartner, P.: 1989, ‘Non-Statement-View: Ein Dialog zwischen Sokrates und Theaitetos’, in W. Gombocz, H. Rutte and W. Sauer (eds.),Traditionen und Perspektiven der analytischen Philosophie. Festschrift für R. Haller, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 554–567.
Westermann, R.: 1989, ‘Festinger's Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Revised Structuralist Reconstruction’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.), pp. 33–62.
Westmeyer, H. (ed.): 1989,Psychological Theories from a Structuralist Point of View, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 212pp.
Westmeyer, H.: 1989a, ‘Psychological Theories from a Structuralist Point of View: A First Introduction’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.), pp. 1–12.
Westmeyer, H.: 1989b, ‘The Theory of Behavior Interaction: A Structuralist Construction of a Theory and a Reconstruction of its Theoretical Environment’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.), pp. 145–185.
1990
de Asúa, M. and Klimovsky, G.: 1990, ‘Ensayo de axiomatización de la teoría tisular y su reducción a la teoría celular’,Theoria V, 12–13, 129–140.
Balzer, W.: 1990, ‘A Basic Model For Social Institutions’,Journal of Mathematical Sociology 16(1), 1–19.
Crespo López, R. and Martín Fernández, J. C.: 1990, ‘La Distinción T-teórico/T-no-teórico: El status de los términos T-no-teóricos en la concepción estructural’, in A. Diez, J. Echeverria and A. Ibarra (eds.),Structures in Mathematical Theories. Reports of the San Sebastian International Symposium, University of the Basque Country Press, Bilbao, pp. 29–34.
Crespo López, R. and Moreno Bergareche, A.: 1990, ‘Holones teóricos coherentistas: problemas en el marco de la teoría estructuralista’, in A. Diez, J. Echeverría and A. Ibarra (eds.),Structures in Mathematical Theories. Reports of the San Sebastian International Symposium, University of the Basque Country Press, Bilbao, pp. 29–34.
Day, M. A.: 1990, ‘The No-Slip Condition of Fluid Dynamics’,Erkenntnis 33, 285–296.
Diederich, W.: 1990, ‘Does the Way we Make Empirical Claims Show What we Believe to be Real?’ in A. Diez, J. Echeverría and A. Ibarra (eds.),Structures in Mathematical Theories. Reports of the San Sebastian International Symposium, University of the Basque Country Press, Bilbao, pp. 35–38.
Diez Calzada, J. A.: 1990, ‘Observaciones sobre el concepto estructuralista de evolución teórica’, in A. Diez, J. Echeverría and A. Ibarra (eds.),Structures in Mathematical Theories. Reports of the San Sebastian International Symposium, University of the Basque Country Press, Bilbao, pp. 39–44.
Eleftheriadis, A.: 1990,Die Struktur der hippokratischen Theorie der Medizin, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Etxeberria, J. K.: 1990, ‘Análisis estructuralista de la teoría electromagnética clásica’, in A. Diez, J. Echeverría and A. Ibarra,Structures in Mathematical Theories. Reports of the San Sebastian International Symposium, University of the Basque Country Press, Bilbao, pp. 39–44.
Forge, J.: 1990, ‘Theoretical Explanation and Errors of Measurement’,Erkenntnis 33, 371–390.
Gähde, U.: 1990, ‘On Innertheoretical Conditions for Theoretical Terms’,Erkenntnis 32, 215–233.
García de la Sienra, A.: 1990, ‘Estructuras y representaciones’,Crítica XXII, 3–22.
Hadjduk, Z.: 1990, ‘Review of Jonkisz (1990)’,Zagadnienie Naukoznawstwa 4, 660–662.
Jahnke, H. N.: 1990, ‘Hilbert, Weyl und die Philosophie der Mathematik’,Mathematische Semesterberichte 37, 157–179.
Jodkowski, K.: 1990, ‘J. D. Sneeda i W. Stegmüllera próba racjonalnej interpretacji niektórych idei kuhnowskiej koncepcji paradygmatów’, in K. Jodkowski (ed.),Wspólnoty uczonych, paradygmaty i rewolucje naukowe. Realizm. Racjonalnosc. Relatywizm 22, University of Maria Sklodowska-Curie, Lublin, pp. 455–511.
Jonkisz, A.: 1990, ‘Struktura, zmiennosc i postep nauki. Ujecie strukturalne’,Realizm. Racjonalnosc. Relatywizm 26, University of Maria Sklodowska-Curie, Lublin.
Kaleri, E.: 1990,Ein Beitrag zur Methodologie der literarischen Stilinterpretation, Fakultät für Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe.
Kroes, P.: 1990, ‘Review of Wolfgang Balzer, C. Ulises Moulines and Joseph D. Sneed. An Architectonic for Science (1987)’,Philosophy of Science 57, 349–350.
Kuokkanen, M.: 1990, ‘Social Psychological Balance Theories from a Structuralist Point of View’, in A. Diez, J. Echeverría and A. Ibarra (eds.),Structures in Mathematical Theories. Reports of the San Sebastian International Symposium, University of the Basque Country Press, Bilbao, pp. 69–75.
Kuokkanen, M.: 1990a, ‘The Hierarchical Structure of Testing Theories’,Erkenntnis 32, 235–267.
Marí, E. E.: 1990,Elementos de epistemología comparada, punto sur editores, Buenos Aires.
Mormann, Th.: 1990, Review of W. Balzer and M. Heidelberger (eds.), ‘Zur Logik empirischer Theorien’, and W. Balzer, D. A. Pearce and H.-J. Schmidt (eds.), ‘Reduction in Science’,Erkenntnis 33, 411–419.
Parthey, H.: 1990, ‘Entdeckung, Erfindung und Innovation’, in H. Parthey (ed.),Das Neue — Seine Entstehung und Aufnahme in Natur und Gesellschaft, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 97–148.
Peris Viñé, L. M.: 1990, ‘First Steps on the Reconstruction of Chomskyan Grammar’, in A. Diez, J. Echeverría and A. Ibarra (eds.),Structures in Mathematical Theories. Reports of the San Sebastian International Symposium, University of the Basque Country Press, Bilbao, pp. 83–87.
Peris Viñé, L. M.: 1990a, ‘Aspectos de la estructura lógica de la teoría del régimen y el ligamiento’, in C. Martín Vide (ed.),Actas del V Congreso de lenguajes naturales y lenguajes formales, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, pp. 629–644.
Quesada, D.: 1990, ‘Grammar as a Theory: An Analysis of the Standard Model of Syntax Within the Structural Program’, in A. Diez, J. Echeverría and A. Ibarra (eds.),Structures in Mathematical Theories. Reports of the San Sebastian International Symposium, University of the Basque Country Press, Bilbao, pp. 25–29.
Schurz, G.: 1990, ‘Paradoxical Consequences of Balzer's and Gähde's Criteria of Theoreticity. Results of an Application to Ten Scientific Theories’,Erkenntnis 32, 161–214.
Stegmüller, W.: 1990, ‘Review of W. Balzer, C. U. Moulines and J. D. Sneed (1987): An Architectonic for Science’,Erkenntnis 33, 399–410.
Stephan, E.: 1990, ‘Zur logischen Struktur psychologischer Theorien’,Lehr-und For-schungstexte Psychologie 33, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Torretti, R.: 1990,Creative Understanding. Philosophical Reflections on Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Weingartner, P.: 1990, ‘The Non-Statement View’, in G. Dorn and P. Weingartner (eds.),Studies on Mario Bunge's Treatise, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 455–465.
1991
Balzer, W. and Eleftheriadis, A.: 1991, ‘A Reconstruction of the Hippocratic Humoral Theory of Health’,Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22, 207–227.
Balzer, W. and Mattesich, R.: 1991, ‘An Axiomatic Basis of Accounting: A Structuralist Reconstruction’,Theory and Decision 30, 213–243.
Breinlinger-O'Reilly, J.: 1991,Aufbau und Struktur wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Theorien — Eine Kritik am wissenschaftstheoretischen Entwurf von Dieter Schneider und die strukturalistische Alternative, René F. Wilfer, Spardorf.
Burgin, M. S. and Kuznetsov, V. I.: 1991,Axiological Aspects of Scientific Theories, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 184pp.
Falguera, J. L.: 1991, ‘Cuatro obras recientes sobre estructuras de las teorías científicas, review of M. Cadevall, ‘La estructura de la teoría de la evolución’; E. A. Lloyd, ‘The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory’; A. Moya, ‘Sobre la estructura de la teorfa de la evolución’; P. Thompson, ‘The Structure of Biological Theories’,Theoria 14–15, 281–286.
Heise, E.: 1991,Strukturalistische Rekonstruktion der ACT *-Theorie von Andersson, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Kim, B.-H.: 1991,Kritik des Strukturalismus. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Strukturalismus vom Standpunkt der falsifikationistischen Wissenschaftstheorie, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Kuipers, Th. A. F.: 1991, ‘Structuralist Explications of Dialectics’, in G. Schurz and G. J. W. Dorn (eds.),Advances in Scientific Philosophy, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 295–317.
Lauth, B.: 1991, ‘Theory Evolution and Reference Kinematics’,Synthese 88, 279–307.
Lucas, Th.: 1991, ‘Compte Rendu de W. Balzer, C. U. Moulines et J. D. Sneed, An Architectonic for Science. The Structuralist Program’,Revue Philosophique de Louvain 89, 522–524.
Mormann, Th.: 1991, ‘Husserl's Philosophy of Science and the Semantic Approach’,Philosophy of Science 58, 61–83.
Moulines, C. U.: 1991, ‘The Classical Spirit in J. Willard Gibbs's Classical Thermodynamics’, in K. Martinás, L. Ropolyi and P. Szegedi (eds.),Thermodynamics: History and Philosophy. Facts, Trends, Debates, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp. 7–28.
Moulines, C. U.: 1991a, ‘Pragmatics in the Structuralist View of Science’, in G. Schurz and G. J. W. Dorn (eds.),Advances in Scientific Philosophy, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 313–326.
Moulines, C. U.: 1991b,Pluralidad y recursión. Estudios epistemológicos, Alianza, Madrid.
Moulines, C. U.: 1991c, ‘Pragmatisch-diachronische Aspekte der Wissenschaftstheorie’,Untersuchungen zur Logik und zur Methodologie Bd. 8, Karl-Marx Universität Leipzig.
Peris Viñé, L. M.: 1991, ‘Relación de especialización, gramática universal y gramaticas particulares’, in C. Martín Vide (ed.),Lenguajes naturales y lenguajes formales VI, PPU, Barcelona, pp. 839–859.
Przelecki, M.: 1991, ‘Is the Notion of Truth Applicable to Scientific Theories?’, in G. Schurz and G. J. W Dorn (eds.),Advances in Scientific Philosophy, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 283–294.
Rantala, V.: 1991, ‘Review of Balzer, Moulines, Sneed (1987)’,Synthese 86, 297–319.
Requate, T.: 1991, ‘Once Again Pure Exchange Economies: A Critical View Towards the Structuralistic Reconstructions by Balzer and Stegmüller’,Erkenntnis 34, 87–116.
Sintonen, M.: 1991, ‘How Evolutionary Theory Faces the Reality’,Synthese 89, 163–183.
Westmeyer, H.: 1991, ‘Die strukturalistische Konzeption psychologischer Theorien’,Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften 2, 91–102.
Witte, E. H.: 1991, ‘Eine Systematisierung intendierter Anwendungsformen für sozial-wissenschaftlich-psychologische Theorien’,Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften 2, 123–156.
1992
Balzer, W.: 1992,The Structuralist View of Measurement: An Extension of Received Measurement Theories, in C. W. Savage et al. (eds.).
Balzer, W.: 1992a, ‘A Theory of Power in Small Groups’. in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 191–210.
Burgin, M. and Kuznetsov, V.: 1992,The Structure-Nominative Analysis of Theoretical Knowledge (Ideas, Results and Perspectives), Proceedings of the Institute of Philosophy, IP-92-01, Kiev, 36pp.
Díez Calzada, J. A.: 1992, ‘Estructura y cinemática de teorías’,Agora 11(1), 51–68.
Díez Calzada, J. A.: 1992a,Metrización y teoricidad. Una reconstrucción estructuralista de la teoría de la metrización fundamental, Bases para una semántica de los conceptos métricos, doctoral dissertation, University of Barcelona, Barcelona.
Falguera, J. L.: 1992, ‘La noción de modelo en los análisis de la concepción estructuralista’,Agora 11(1), 97–104.
Falguera, J. L.: 1992a,Problemas ontosemánticos de los términos científicos conforme a la concepción estructuralista, doctoral dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela.
Falguera, J. L.: 1992b, ‘El papel semántico de los métodos de determinación para una teoría científica’, in C. Inchaurralde, C. Olivares and P. Navarro (eds),Semántica y lenguajes especializados, University of Saragossa, Saragossa, pp. 103–112.
Gähde, U.: 1992, ‘On Innertheoretical Conditions for Theoretical Terms’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 27–39.
Gähde, U., Jagodzinski, W. and Steyer, R.: 1992, ‘On Structuralist Reconstruction of Latent State-Trait Theory’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology:Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 105–119.
Heise, E.: 1992, ‘Anderson's ACT*-theory Applied to Skill Acquisition: From the Theoretical Framework to Empirical Content’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology. Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 87–103.
Hempel, C. G.: 1992, ‘In Memoriam Wolfgang Stegmüller’,Erkenntnis 36, 5–6.
Hinst, P.: 1992, ‘Wolfgang Stegmüllers wissenschaftlicher Werdegang’,Erkenntnis 36, 7–12.
Ibarra, A. and Mormann, Th.: 1992, ‘Propiedades modelísticas del concepto de reducción’,Agora 11(1), 69–95.
Kuipers, Th. A. F.: 1992, ‘Naive and Refined Truth Approximation’,Synthese 93(3), 299–341.
Kuokkanen, M.: 1992, ‘The Continuity Problem of Scientific Theories: An Example of Social-psychological Balance Theorizing’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology. Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 211–247.
Kuokkanen, M.: 1992a, ‘A Generalization of the Role Expectation Conflict Theory with a Methodological Analysis’,Journal of Mathematical Sociology 17(2–3), 155–175.
Moulines, C. U.: 1992, Review of Hans Westmeyer (ed.),Psychological Theories from a Structuralist Point of View, Erkenntnis 36(3), 375–378.
Moulines, C. U.: 1992a, ‘La concepción estructural de las ciencias como forma de holismo’,Agora 11(1), 9–18.
Moulines, C. U.: 1992b, ‘Towards a Typology of Intertheoretical Relations’, in J. Echeverría, A. Ibarra and Th. Mormann (eds.),The Space of Mathematics. Philosophical, Epistemological, and Historical Explorations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 403–411.
Moulines, C. U.: 1992c, ‘Structures, Links, and Holons’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 13–26.
Moulines, C. U.: 1992d, ‘La concepción estructuralista de la ciencia’, in C. Martín Vide (ed.),Lenguajes naturales y lenguajes formales VII, PPU, Barcelona, pp. 75–82.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1992, ‘Reality, Truth, and Confirmation in Mathematics — Reflections on the Quasi-Empiricist Programme’, in J. Echeverria, A. Ibarra and Th. Mormann (eds.),The Space of Mathematics. Philosophical, Epistemological, and Historical Explorations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 60–78.
Rantala, V.: 1992, ‘Reduction and Explanation: Science vs. Mathematics’, in J. Echeverría, A. Ibarra and Th. Mormann (eds.),The Space of Mathematics. Philosophical, Epistemological, and Historical Explorations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 47–59.
Reisenztein, R.: 1992, ‘A Structuralist Reconstruction of Wundt's Three-Dimensional Theory of Emotion’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology:Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 141–189.
Savage, C. W. and Ehrlich, Ph. (eds.): 1992,Philosophical and Foundational Issues in Measurement Theory, Lawrence, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Schmidt, H.-J.: 1992, ‘The Status of Set-theoretic Axioms in Empirical Theories’, in J. Echeverría, A. Ibarra and Th. Mormann (eds.),The Space of Mathematics. Philosophical, Epistemological, and Historical Explorations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 156–167.
Sneed, J. D.: 1992, ‘Structuralism and Scientific Discovery’, in J. Echeverría, A. Ibarra and Th. Mormann (eds.),The Space of Mathematics. Philosophical, Epistemological, and Historical Explorations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 379–402.
Stephan, E.: 1992, ‘Desiderate der Theorieforschung in den Sozialwissenschaften — und wie sie beseitigt werden können, (Kritik zum Hauptartikel von Werner J. Patzelt: “Formen und Aufgaben von ‘Theorienforschung” in den Sozialwissenschaften)’,Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften 3, 166–169.
Suck, R.: 1992, ‘Probabilistic Components of a Theory in the Structuralistic Reconstruction’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 55–69.
Troitsch, K. G.: 1992, ‘Structuralist Theory Reconstruction and Specification of Simulation Models in the Social Sciences’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 71–86.
Ueckert, H.: 1992, ‘A Structuralist Theory-Holon of Human Action and Action-Probing’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology. Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 121–140.
Westermann, R., Heise, E. and Gerjets, P.: 1992, ‘The Justification of Empirical Suppositions: A Structuralist Analysis of an Inductive Form of Scientific Reasoning’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 41–54.
Westmeyer, H. (ed.): 1992,The Structuralist Program in Psychology. Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, 292pp.
Westmeyer, H.: 1992a, ‘Introduction to the Structuralist Program in Psychology’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 1–12.
Westmeyer, H.: 1992b, ‘Sex-Role Influences in Dyadic Interaction: A Structuralist Reconstruction of W. Ickes' Theory’, in H. Westmeyer (ed.),The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 249–281.
Zamora Bonilla, J. P.: 1992, ‘Truthlikeness without Truth: A Methodological Approach’,Synthese 93(3), 343–372.
Zelewski, St.: 1992,Strukturalistische Produktionstheorie. Habilitationsschrift Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Köln, Köln.
Zoubek, G., und B. Lauth: 1992, ‘Zur Rekonstruktion des Bohrschen Forschungsprogramms I’,Erkenntnis 37, 223–247.
Zoubek, G. und B. Lauth: 1992, ‘Zur Rekonstruktion des Bohrschen Forschungsprogramms II’,Erkenntnis 37, 249–273.
1993
Balzer, W.: 1993,Soziale Institutionen, de Gruyter, Berlin.
Balzer, W., Lauth, B. and Zoubek, G.: 1993, ‘A Model for Science Kinematics’,Studia Logica 52, 519–548.
Bartelborth, T.: 1993, ‘Hierarchy versus Holism: a Structuralist View on General Relativity’,Erkenntnis 39, 383–412.
Bickle, J.: 1993, ‘Connectionism, Eliminativism, and the Semantic View of Theories’,Erkenntnis 39, 359–382.
Casanueva, M.: 1993, ‘Relaciones Interteóricas’, in C. U. Moulines (ed.),La ciencia:estructura y desarrollo, Editorial Trotta, Madrid, pp. 163–179.
Díez Calzada, J. A.: 1993, ‘Bases para una semántica de los conceptos métricos’, in E. de Bustos, J. Echeverría, E. Pérez Sedeño and M. I. Sánchez Balmaseda (eds.),Actas del I Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España, UNED, Madrid, pp. 317–320.
Echeverría, J.: 1993, ‘Teorías matemáticas y concepción estructural’, in E. de Bustos, J. Echeverría, E. Pérez Sedeño and M. I. Sánchez Balmaseda (eds.),Actas del I Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España, UNED, Madrid, pp. 321–324.
Etxeberria, J. K.: 1993, ‘Reconstrucción estructuralista de la mecánica matricial’, in E. de Bustos, J. Echeverría, E. Pérez Sedeño and M. I. Sánchez Balmaseda (eds.),Actas del I Congreso de la Sociedad de Logica, Metodologfa y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España, UNED, Madrid, pp. 332–335.
Etxeberria, J. K.: 1993, ‘Algunos objeciones al concepto estructuralista de red teórica’. in E. de Bustos, J. Echeverría, E. Pérez Sedeño and M. I. Sánchez Balmaseda (eds.),Actas del I Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodologfa y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España, UNED, Madrid, pp. 336–339.
Eizagirre, X. and Echeverría, J.: 1993, Review of C. U. Moulines, ‘Pluralidad y recursión’,Theoria 19, 169–173.
Falguera, J. L.: 1993, ‘Sobre la distinción estructuralista entre concepto científico concreto y concepto científico abstracto’, in E. de Bustos, J. Echeverría, E. Pérez Sedeño and M. I. Sánchez Balmaseda (eds.),Actas del I Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodologfa y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España, UNED, Madrid, pp. 340–344.
Falguera, J. L.: 1993a, ‘Aplicación del programa de Montague al análisis de una formulación lingüística de la mecánica del choque’, in C. Martín Vide (ed.),Lenguajes naturales y lenguajes formales IX, PPU, Barcelona, pp. 293–300.
Kaleri, E.: 1993,Methodologie der literarischen Stilinterpretation. Versuch einer analytischen Durchdringung hermeneutischer Strukturen, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, 241pp.
Kuokkanen, M.: 1993, ‘On the Structuralist Constraints in Social Scientific Theorizing’,Theory and Decision 35, 19–54.
Moulines, C. U. (ed.): 1993,La ciencia: estructura y desarrollo, Editorial Trotta, Madrid, 234pp.
Moulines, C. U.: 1993a, ‘Conceptos Teóricos y Teorías Científicas’, in C. U. Moulines (ed.),La ciencia: estructura y desarrollo, Editorial Trotta, Madrid, pp. 147–162.
Pérez Ransanz, A. R.: 1993, ‘Modelos de Cambio Científico’, in C. U. Moulines (ed.),La ciencia: estructura y desarrollo, Editorial Trotta, Madrid, pp. 181–202.
Rodríguez Ladreda, R. M.: 1993,Teoría y Práctica en la Ciencia, Universidad de Granada, Granada, 306pp.
Schmidt, H.-J.: 1993, ‘A Definition of Mass in Newton-Lagrange Mechanics’,Philosophia Naturalis 6, 199–207.
Stachowiak, H.: 1993, ‘Zur Pragmatik kognitiver Prozesse’,Dialectica 47, 291–304.
Vázquez, J.: 1993, ‘Elementos para la reconstrucción de una semántica formal para las teorías científicas en el marco de la concepción estructuralista’, in E. de Bustos, J. Echeverría, E. Pérez Sedeño and M. I. Sánchez Balmaseda (eds.),Actas del I Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodologla y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España, UNED, Madrid, pp. 538–541.
Zamora Bonilla, J. P.: 1993, ‘Verosimilitud y estructuralismo. Propuesta de una huída hacia adelante’, in E. de Bustos, J. Echeverría, E. Pérez Sedeño and M. I. Sánchez Balmaseda (eds.),Actas del I Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodologla y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España, UNED, Madrid, pp. 550–553.
Zoglauer, T.: 1993,Das Problem der theoretischen Terme — eine Kritik an der strukturalistischen Wissenschaftstheorie, Vieweg, Braunschweig.
1994
Abel, G.: 1994, ‘Theorie, Beobachtung und Wirklichkeit. Zu einer interpretationistischen Konzeption der Erfahrungserkenntnis’, in H.-J. Sandkühler (ed.),Theorien, Modelle und Tatsachen, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 9–28.
Bartelborth, T.: 1994, ‘Modelle und Wirklichkeitsbezug. Was uns Theorien über die Welt sagen können’, in H.-J. Sandkühler (ed.),Theorien, Modelle und Tatsachen, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 87–106.
Bartelborth, T.: 1994a, ‘Wozu benötigen wir “holistische Komplexe”?’, in H.-J. Sandkühler (ed.),Theorien, Modelle und Tatsachen, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 145–154.
Gähde, U.: 1994, ‘Modelle und ihre Vernetzung in einer semantischen Auffassung empirischer Theorien’, in H.-J. Sandkühler (ed.),Theorien, Modelle und Tatsachen, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 11–136.
Rheinwald, R.: 1994, ‘Konsequenzen der Unbestimmtheit: Modell, Ontologie und Referenz’, in H.-J. Sandkühler (ed.),Theorien, Modelle und Tatsachen, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 137–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diederich, W., Ibarra, A. & Mormann, T. Bibliography of structuralism II (1989–1994 and Additions). Erkenntnis 41, 403–418 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130761
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130761