Abstract
According to Bohr’s later report [1], at the 1930 Solvay conference Einstein made a final attempt at demonstrating that the actual possibilities of measurement and prediction, as allowed by quantum mechanics itself, lead to violations of the uncertainty relations. If this were correct, the conclusion would be inevitable that quantum mechanics is incomplete: a more precise description would be possible for an individual system than given by the quantum mechanical state. According to Bohr Einstein devised a thought-experiment with which it would be possible to predict both the precise energy of a photon and its exact time of arrival at a detector, in conflict with a version of the energy-time uncertainty relation. Bohr countered the proposal by arguing that if the details of the measuring procedure are properly considered, taking into account the quantum mechanical character of the measuring device itself, it turns out that the photon energy and the instant of the photon’s emission from the source (a ‘photon box’) cannot both be perfectly fixed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bohr, N.: 1949 Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics, in P.A. Schilpp, ed., Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Open Court, La Salle, 199 – 241.
Busch, P.: 1990 ‘On the Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation’, Foundations of Physics, 20, 1 – 32.
Howard, D.: 1990 Nicht Sein Kann Was Nicht Sein Darf, in A.I. Miller, ed., Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty. New York, Plenum, 61 – 111.
Hughes, R.J.: 1990 ’The Bohr-Einstein Weighing-of-Energy Debate and the Principle of Equivalence’, American Journal of Physics, 58, 826 – 828.
Jammer, M.: 1974, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. New York, Wiley & Sons.
Landé, A.: 1965, New Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 123.
Peierls, R.: 1979, Surprises in Theoretical Physics. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 36 – 39.
Popper, K.R.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, Hutchinson & Co, Appendix xi.
Treder, H.-J.: 1971, The Einstein-Bohr Box Experiment, in W. Yourgrau, A. van der Merwe, eds., Perspectives in Quantum Theory. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 17 – 24.
Unruh, W.G., Opat, G.I.: 1979, ’The Bohr-Einstein ‘Weighing of Energy’ Debate’, American Journal of Physics, 47, 743–744.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dieks, D. (1999). The Bohr-Einstein Photon Box Debate. In: Chiara, M.L.D., Giuntini, R., Laudisa, F. (eds) Language, Quantum, Music. Synthese Library, vol 281. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2043-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2043-4_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5229-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2043-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive