References
‘A Death-Blow to Sakara's Non-Dualism? A Dualist Refutation’, Religious Studies XII (1976), and ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, Religious Studies XIV (1978).
‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p. 292
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p293
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p295
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p294
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p295
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p295
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p295
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p295
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p296
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p297
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p297. At this point in his essay, Betty quotes from Stace what he supposes would be Stace's reply. He then rebuts Stace. I shall consider only those points in the rebuttal which seem relevant to the present discussion.
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p298
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p298
Ibid. ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p299
W.T. Stace, Mysticism and Philosophy (London Macmillan, 1960), p. 244; partly quoted by Betty in ‘Towards a Reconciliation of Mysticism and Dualism’, p.300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Digby, T. Mystical non-duality. SOPH 21, 17–22 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789937
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789937