Abstract
In this paper an outline of a metaphysical conception of modern science is presented in which a fundamental distinction is drawn between scientific principles, laws and theories. On this view, ontologicalprinciples, rather than e.g. empirical data, constitute the core of science. The most fundamental of these principles are three in number, being, more particularly (A) the principle of the uniformity of nature, (B) the principle of the perpetuity of substance, and (C) the principle of causality.
These three principles set basic constraints on the methodology of both empirical and theoretical science. The uniformity principle is central to the empirical aspect of science, suggesting a methodology consisting in the attempt to discover empiricallaws, while the causality principle is central to the theoretical aspect of science, suggesting the postulation of scientifictheories capable of indicating the causal basis of the laws. And the perpetuity principle functions so as to form a bridge between the theories and the laws.
By distinguishing between principles, laws and theories in this way, a dimension is added to the analysis of modern science which allows for a more realistic account of its nature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agazzi, E.: 1986, ‘The Historical Dimensions of Science and Its Philosophy’,Diogenes 132, 60–79.
Aristotle: 1985,The Complete Works of Aristotle, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Bailey, C.: 1928,The Greek Atomists and Epicurus, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bigelow, J. et al.: 1988, ‘Forces’,Philosophy of Science 55, 614–30.
Boltzmann, L.: 1974, ‘On Statistical Mechanics’, inhis Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 159–72.
Born, M.: 1951,Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Campbell, N. R.: 1920,Physics: The Elements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; reissued asFoundations of Science, Dover Publications, New York, 1957.
Čapek, M.: 1961,The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics, D. Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.
d'Abro, A.: 1952,The Rise of the New Physics, Dover Publications, New York.
Dilworth, C.: 1994,Scientific Progress, 3rd ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Dilworth, C.: 1994/95,The Metaphysics of Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (forthcoming).
Duhem, P.: 1981,The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, P. P. Wiener (trans.), Athenum, New York.
Einstein, A.: 1949, ‘Remarks Concerning the Essays Brought Together in this Cooperative Volume’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The LIbrary of Living Philosophers, Evanston, Illinois, pp. 665–88.
Ellis, B.: 1965, ‘The Origin and Nature of Newton's Laws of Motion’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.),Beyond the Edge of Certainty, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp. 29–68.
Enriques, F.: 1914,Problems of Science, Open Court, Chicago.
Enriques, F.: 1934,Signification de l'Histoire de la Pensée Scientifique, Hermann & Cie, Paris.
Feyerabend, P.: 1978,Against Method, Verso, London.
Flamm, D.: 1983, ‘Ludwig Boltzmann and his Influence on Science’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14, 255–78.
Graves, J. C.: 1971,The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Relativity Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Harré, R.: 1970,The Principles of Scientific Thinking, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hutten, E. H.: 1956,The Language of Modern Physics, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Jevons, W. S.: 1887,The Principles of Science, Macmillan, London.
Kant, I.: 1933,Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp Smith (trans.), Macmillan, London.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Maxwell, J. C.: 1953,Matter and Motion, Dover Publications, New York.
McMullin, E.: 1984, ‘Two Ideals of Explanation in Natural Science’,Causation and Causal Theories, in P. A. French et al. (eds.),Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. IX, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 205–20.
Newton, I.: 1934,Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, A. Motte (trans.), University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Northrop, F. S. C.: 1931,Science and First Principles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Poincaré, H.: 1952,Science and Hypothesis, Dover Publications, New York.
Poincaré, H.: 1958,The Value of Science, Dover Publications, New York.
Popper, K. R.: 1968,Conjectures and Refutations, Harper & Row, New York.
Tait, P. G.: 1876,Lectures on Some Recent Advances in Physical Science, Macmillan, London.
Toulmin, S.: 1973, ‘Rationality and the Changing Aims of Inquiry’, in P. Suppes et al. (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 885–903.
von Wright, G. H.: 1987,Vetenskapen och Förnuftet, Bonniers, Stockholm.
Weyl, H.: 1949,Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Whewell, W.: 1860,Philosophy of Discovery, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Vol. 4, Part III, 3rd ed., Parker and Son, London.
Whewell, W.: 1967,The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 2nd ed., Frank Cass, London.
Wigner, E. P.: 1967,Symmetries and Reflections, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dilworth, C. Principles, laws, theories and the metaphysics of science. Synthese 101, 223–247 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064018
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064018