Skip to main content

Dynamic Epistemic Logic for Budget-Constrained Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications (DaLí 2022)

Abstract

We present a static (\(\textsf{EL}_{\textsf{bc}}\)) and dynamic (\(\textsf{DEL}_{\textsf{bc}}\)) epistemic logic for budget-constrained agents, in which an agent can obtain some information in exchange for budget resources. \(\textsf{EL}_{\textsf{bc}}\) extends a standard multi-agent epistemic logic with expressions concerning agent’s budgets and formulas’ costs. \(\textsf{DEL}_{\textsf{bc}}\) extends \(\textsf{EL}_{\textsf{bc}}\) with dynamic modality “\([?_i A]\varphi \)” which reads as “\(\varphi \) holds after i’s question whether a propositional formula A is true”. In this paper we provide a sound and complete axiomatization for \(\textsf{EL}_{\textsf{bc}}\) and \(\textsf{DEL}_{\textsf{bc}}\) and show that both logics are decidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alechina, N., Logan B.: Ascribing beliefs to resource bounded agents. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 881–888. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alechina, N., Logan, B.: A logic of situated resource-bounded agents. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 18, 79–95 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alechina N., Logan B., Whitsey M.: A complete and decidable logic for resource-bounded agents. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS, New York, USA, pp. 606–613 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balbiani, P., Fernandez-Duque, D., Lorini, E.: The dynamics of epistemic attitudes in resource-bounded agents. Stud. Logica. 107, 457–488 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Ditmarsch, H., Fan, J.: Propositional quantification in logics of contingency. J. Appl. Non-Classical Logics 26(1), 81–102 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Ditmarsch, H.P., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer, Berlin (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Dautović, Š, Doder, D., Ognjanović, Z.: An epistemic probabilistic logic with conditional probabilities. In: Faber, W., Friedrich, G., Gebser, M., Morak, M. (eds.) JELIA 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12678, pp. 279–293. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Duc, H.N.: Reasoning about rational, but not logically omniscient, agents. J. Log. Comput. 7(5), 633–648 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elgot-Drapkin, J., Miller, M., Perlis, D.: Memory, reason and time: the steplogic approach. In: Cummins, R., Pollock, J.L. (eds.) Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface. MIT Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y.: Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning. Artif. Intell. 34, 39–76 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Megiddo, N.: A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Inf. Comput. 87(1), 78–128 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grant, J., Kraus, S., Perlis, D.: A logic for characterizing multiple bounded agents. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 3(4), 351–387 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jago, M.: Epistemic logic for rule-based agents. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 18(1), 131–158 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Handbook of Logic and Language, 2nd edn., pp. 671–690 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Naumov P., Tao J.: Budget-constrained knowledge in multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS, Istanbul, pp. 219–226 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Solaki, A.: Bounded multi-agent reasoning: actualizing distributed knowledge. In: Martins, M.A., Sedlár, I. (eds.) DaLi 2020. LNCS, vol. 12569, pp. 239–258. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65840-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Y., Cao, Q.: On axiomatizations of public announcement logic. Synthese 190, 103–134 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University). Also we would like to thank Evgeny Zolin, Elia Zardini and three anonymous reviewers for comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maksim Gladyshev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dolgorukov, V., Gladyshev, M. (2023). Dynamic Epistemic Logic for Budget-Constrained Agents. In: Areces, C., Costa, D. (eds) Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications. DaLí 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13780. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26622-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26622-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26621-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26622-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics