Abstract
As with many human desires, transhumanist hope often lapses into transhumanist hype, but that recognition usually seems to come from those who fear the prospects. As a result, denunciations are frequently as vague as they are dismissive. Yet, despite potential benefits in the transhumanist agenda, there are legitimate reasons for questioning some of its particular projections and doing so can help distinguish between the hope and hype. Focusing on inherent limitations to cognitive enhancement, for instance, is instructive because that arena is so intimately connected to personhood and is also the gateway to other envisioned forms of improvement. Identifying those restrictions is also germane to considerations of Christian engagement with the realities of a transhumanist future—a future whose “superior” beings can never escape faith.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Pope , Essay on Man (Epistle I), 7.
- 2.
Teilhard de Chardin , Phenomenon of Man.
- 3.
Cf. Mitchell , “Define Better”; Bieber-Lake , Prophets of the Posthuman.
- 4.
Cf. Hofstadter , Fluid Concepts; Kurzweil , How to Create a Mind; Bak , How Nature Works.
- 5.
Garreau , Radical Evolution.
- 6.
Markoff , “Computer Wins on ‘Jeopardy!’”
- 7.
Krauthammer and Dowell , “Kasparov: Deep Blue Funk.”
- 8.
Eigler and Schweizer , “Positioning Single Atoms with a Scanning Tunnelling Microscope.”
- 9.
Rothemund , “Folding DNA to Create Nanoscale Shapes and Patterns.”
- 10.
Drexler et al., Productive Nanosystems, v.
- 11.
Tyson , Neil deGrasse, “Holy Wars: An Astrophysicist Ponders the God Question,” in Kurtz , Science and Religion, 79.
- 12.
Cf. Drummond , Ascent of Man, 171.
- 13.
Reeves and Donaldson , Little Book for New Scientists.
- 14.
Compare Grassie , “H-: Millennialism at the Singularity: Reflections on Metaphors, Meanings, and the Limits of Exponential Logic.”
- 15.
Moravec , “When Will Computer Hardware Match the Human Brain?” See also Moravec , Robot.
- 16.
This is true both for any particular or general problem-solving strategies and for the problem-solving architecture itself.
- 17.
For example, Kurzweil, How to Create a Mind and The Singularity Is Near.
- 18.
Kurzweil , How to Create a Mind.
- 19.
The list is enormous and the literature extensive. For a summary of some issues that must be addressed, see Donaldson , “Predictive Learning.” Some noteworthy suggestions for tackling some of those problems include Albus , “Outline for a Theory of Intelligence”; Hawkins , On Intelligence; Donaldson , “A Neural Network for Creative Serial Order Cognitive Behavior.”
- 20.
Turing , “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.”
- 21.
Albus , “Outline for a Theory of Intelligence.” Marvin Minsky (Society of Mind) acknowledged years ago that without emotions , machine intelligence would never rival that of humans.
- 22.
Wolfram , A New Kind of Science, 715–717.
- 23.
Penrose , The Emperor’s New Mind.
- 24.
Cf. John Searle’s famous “Chinese Room” thought experiment (“Minds, Brains, and Programs”).
- 25.
That is, could a zombie be intelligent? Cf. Dennett , Sweet Dreams.
- 26.
Cf. Shannon , “Programming a Computer for Playing Chess.”
- 27.
Some individuals think that quantum computing will be our savior in this regard. For example, Calude and Pӑun (Computing with Cells and Atoms, 253) report that Hughes has estimated that a factoring algorithm (used in encryption, perhaps) that would take years on a traditional Von Neumann computer could be done in minutes or hours on a quantum computer. It appears, however, that a quick solution to save cryptology is simply to increase the size of the keys used for encryption.
- 28.
Kurzweil , The Singularity Is Near.
- 29.
McGilchrist , The Master and His Emissary, 9.
- 30.
Gilovich, How We Know What Isn’t So and “The Hot Hand in Basketball”; Tversky and Kahneman , “Judgment Under Uncertainty” and “The Framing of Decision and the Psychology of Choice.”
- 31.
Kurzweil , How to Create a Mind, 176.
- 32.
Donaldson , Dimensions of Faith, 228.
- 33.
Cf. Taleb , Black Swan.
- 34.
Gödel , “Über Formal Unentscheidbare.”
- 35.
Cf. Berry , Life Is a Miracle, 149.
- 36.
Cf. McGrath , Science and Religion, 51–58; Rosenberg , Philosophy of Science, e.g., 39–59.
- 37.
Van Huyssteen , Shaping of Rationality, 157.
- 38.
See McGilchrist (The Master and His Emissary) regarding concerns about an agenda driven strictly by one logical perspective (left brain) to the exclusion of a larger logical, empathic framework (right brain).
- 39.
And, as an Open Theist might argue, possibly even there as well.
- 40.
Donaldson , Dimensions of Faith, 79–112.
- 41.
Approximation techniques can dramatically speed the discovery of solutions for intractable problems but without being able to guarantee optimality. Such losses of certainty are integrally involved with the concept of faith.
- 42.
Whether that randomness is ontological (real) or epistemological (perceived due to limited capabilities) makes little difference when it comes to human or transhuman faith.
- 43.
Kauffman , At Home in the Universe, 16–17, 23.
- 44.
Donaldson , Dimensions of Faith, 47.
- 45.
Ibid., 17, 29–31, 33, 47, 65.
- 46.
Ibid., 114, 223–36.
- 47.
Matt 5:48.
- 48.
In possible contrast to Teilhard’s vision (The Phenomenon of Man).
- 49.
McGilchrist , The Master and His Emissary, 29.
- 50.
Cf. Peters , “Progress and Provolution: Will Transhumanism Leave Sin Behind?” in Cole-Turner , Transhumanism and Transcendence.
- 51.
An attempt to reclaim the perfections of Adam is sometimes cited as one of the driving factors behind the development of modern science (Harrison , The Bible, Protestantism, and Rise of Natural Science), yet one of the primary conclusions regarding the Fall is that perfect sight does not equal perfect insight.
- 52.
Cf. the explorer/mechanic metaphor in Donaldson , Dimensions of Faith, 139–167.
- 53.
Lewis , The Abolition of Man.
- 54.
Although biblical positions on free will may seem ambiguous, this is one possible avenue of resolution.
- 55.
Cf. Wegner , The Illusion of Conscious Will; Wilson , Consilience.
- 56.
Lewis , The Abolition of Man.
- 57.
John 8:32.
- 58.
Cf. Grenz , The Social God and the Relational Self; Herzfeld , In Our Image; Van Huyssteen , Alone in the World?; Shults , Reforming Theological Anthropology ; Jensen, Systematic Theology.
- 59.
This is because claims for the imago Dei follow immediately after the portrayal of God’s own creative acts.
- 60.
This positive approach is likely what Teilhard (The Phenomenon of Man) had in mind in his vision.
- 61.
Cf. Donaldson , Dimensions of Faith, 220, 244–245, where exploration and discovery (both of which can be associated with creativity) are portrayed as integral to freedom.
- 62.
Cf. the concern of C.S. Lewis in The Abolition of Man.
- 63.
Romans 12:2.
Bibliography
Albus, James S. 1991. Outline for a Theory of Intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21 (3): 473–509.
Bak, Per. 1999. How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. New York: Springer.
Berry, Wendell. 2001. Life Is a Miracle: An Essay Against Modern Superstition. Berkeley: Counterpoint.
Bieber-Lake, Christina. 2013. Prophets of the Posthuman: American Fiction, Biotechnology, and the Ethics of Personhood. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Calude, Cristian S., and Gheorghe Pӑun. 2001. Computing with Cells and Atoms: An Introduction to Quantum, Membrane, and DNA Computing. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Cole-Turner, Ronald, ed. 2011. Transhumanism and Transcendence: Christian Hope in an Age of Technological Enhancement. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Dennett, Daniel C. 2005. Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Donaldson, Steve. 1999. Predictive Learning and Cognitive Momentum: A Foundation for Intelligent, Autonomous Systems. Proceedings of the 37th Southeast Regional Conference of the ACM.
———. 2008. A Neural Network for Creative Serial Order Cognitive Behavior. Minds and Machines 18 (1): 53–91.
———. 2015. Dimensions of Faith: Understanding Faith Through the Lens of Science and Religion. Eugene: Cascade.
Drexler, Eric, John Randall, Stephanie Corchnoy, Alex Kawczak, and Michael L. Steve, eds. 2007. Productive Nanosystems: A Technology Roadmap. Palo Alto: Foresight Institute.
Eigler, D.M., and E.K. Schweizer. 1990. Positioning Single Atoms with a Scanning Tunnelling Microscope. Nature 344: 524–526.
Garreau, Joel. 2006. Radical Evolution. New York: Broadway.
Gilovich, Thomas. 1991. How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press.
Gilovich, Thomas, Robert Vallone, and Amos Tversky. 1985. The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences. Cognitive Psychology 17: 295–314.
Gödel, Kurt. 1931. Über Formal Unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und Verwandter Systeme, I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38: 173–198.
Grassie, William. 2011. H-: Millennialism at the Singularity: Reflections on Metaphors, Meanings, and the Limits of Exponential Logic. Metanexus, August 9. http://www.metanexus.net/essay/h-millennialism-singularity-reflections-metaphors-meanings-and-limits-exponential-logic
Grenz, Stanley. 2001. The Social God and the Relational Self: A Trinitarian Theology of the Imago Dei. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Harrison, Peter. 2001. The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, Jeff, and Sandra Blakeslee. 2004. On Intelligence. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
Herzfeld, Noreen L. 2002. In Our Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Spirit. Minneapolis: Fortress.
Hofstadter, Douglas, ed. 1995. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies. New York: Basic.
Jensen, Robert. 2001. Systematic Theology: The Works of God. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, Stuart. 1996. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krauthammer, Charles, and W. Dowell. 1996. Kasparov: Deep Blue Funk. Time, February 26.
Kurtz, Paul. 2003. Science and Religion: Are they Compatible? New York: Prometheus.
Kurzweil, Ray. 2006. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Penguin.
———. 2013. How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed. New York: Penguin.
Lewis, C.S. 2001. The Abolition of Man. New York: HarperOne.
Markoff, John. 2011. Computer Wins on ‘Jeopardy!’: Trivial, It’s Not. The New York Times, February 16. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/17jeopardy-watson.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
McGilchrist, Iain. 2012. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McGrath, Alister. 2010. Science and Religion: A New Introduction. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Minsky, Marvin. 1985. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Mitchell, Ben. 2004. Define Better. Christianity Today 48 (1): 42–44.
Moravec, Hans. 1998. When Will Computer Hardware Match the Human Brain? Journal of Evolution and Technology 1. http://www.jetpress.org/volume1/moravec.pdf
———. 1999. Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Penrose, Roger. 1989. The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and the Laws of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pope, Alexander. 1844. An Essay on Man in Four Epistles. Troy: W. & H. Merriam.
Reeves, Josh, and Steve Donaldson. 2016. A Little Book for New Scientists: Why and How to Study Science. Downers Grove: IVP Academic.
Rosenberg, Alex. 2012. Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Rothemund, Paul. 2006. Folding DNA to Create Nanoscale Shapes and Patterns. Nature 440: 297–302.
Searle, John R. 1980. Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417–457.
Shannon, Claude E. 1950. Programming a Computer for Playing Chess. Philosophical Magazine 41 (314): 256–275.
Shults, F. LeRon. 2003. Reforming Theological Anthropology: After the Philosophical Turn to Relationality. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.
Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. 2008. The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper Perennial.
Turing, Alan. 1950. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59: 433–460.
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131.
———. 1981. The Framing of Decision and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211 (4481): 453–458.
Van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel. 1999. The Shaping of Rationality: Toward Interdisciplinarity in Theology and Science. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
———. 2006. Alone in the World?: Human Uniqueness in Science and Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Wegner, Daniel. 2003. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
Wilson, Edward O. 1999. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage.
Wolfram, Stephen. 2002. A New Kind of Science. Champaign: Wolfram Media.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donaldson, S. (2018). Do Bigger Brains Mean Smaller Gods? Cognitive Science and Theological Perspectives on Transhumanism and the Church (or, Why We Can’t Outrun Faith). In: Donaldson, S., Cole-Turner, R. (eds) Christian Perspectives on Transhumanism and the Church. Palgrave Studies in the Future of Humanity and its Successors. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90323-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90323-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90322-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90323-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)