Abstract
The goal of this paper is to contrast the representation of models in photography (fashion and fine art photography), as well as certain kinds of inanimate beauty (Barbie dolls, mannequins), with the average faces constructed by algorithms serving to identify and reproduce beauty. What are the similarities and differences between inanimate objects, characterized by faces devoid of singularities and comparable to sorts of angelic faces, and the algorithmic parameters through which beauty and attractiveness are calculated and predicted? This paper will apply an enunciative semiotic analysis to photographic corpora, propose philosophical reflections on the categories of beauty, and will show that the conception of beauty changes from corpus to corpus and from one cultural domain to the other (fine art, advertising, entertainment and so on). The end of the paper states that beauty has to do with a perfect gradation between stillness and movement in the case of the models seen in fashion photography, between neutrality and expressivity for mannequins, and between singularity and multiplicity for dolls such as Barbie, and that, in the algorithmic fabrication of beautiful faces, it is linked with an enhancement of the compactness of the structure of the face.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See on this topic the production of the photographer Eugène Atget.
The mannequin has already caused great amounts of ink to flow, especially in commentaries regarding the myth of the automaton: we can only think of the book considered by some to be the first science fiction novel, The Future Eve by Villiers de l’Isle Adam, published as a novel in 1886.
See Simms comments on Rilke’s theory on dolls: “The great fear which the doll inspires is the fear of a silence and emptiness at the heart of our existence. It grasps the possible absence of transcendence, the possible unreality of a spiritual invisible realm, the possible meaninglessness of our life beyond the fragile clearing of the present. While in Rilke's work the angel affirms existence beyond and without human beings, the doll, in her small and silent way, denies being itself.” (Simms 1996).
On ethical kitsch, see Dondero (2007).
This paper explains how to reach an aggregate analysis of the features extracted through multi-level skip connections in order to produce a better transmission of information from shallow layers to the deeper layers of the network system and to devise a better gradient transmission flow between the input (the real face) and the output images (the beautified face).
This kind of beautification process is very different from the image morphing that can be used for producing fake faces: such a technique performs a continuous transformation between two different faces while identifying their corresponding features in order to define an appropriate warp. Regarding the device that is the mask, which, in the context of deepfake generation, designates a mediating figure between one face and another and which is characterized by blurring, see Dondero (2021) addressing the issue of “becoming the other”. In contrast, in the beautification process, the objective is to find the adequate target shape into which the source image is to be warped.
Many thanks to Marco Viola for alerting me to the relevance of this paper.
Original version: « L’embellissement n’est qu’un moment, celui où, sur la figure le facteur souple (yin–) se mêle au facteur dur (yang –) pour l’empêcher de se durcir; puis où le facteur dur (yang) vient à son tour à barrer la route au facteur souple pour l’empêcher de s’amollir et de devenir excessif. […] Quelle est donc la leçon à tirer de cet « embellissement» ? Elle est celle d’un délicat équilibrage par « imprégnation» diffuse […] et « estompement» […], le tout évitant l’éclat. »
References
Basso Fossali P (2008) Vissuti di significazione. Temi per una semiotica viva. ETS, Pisa
Benveniste E (1974) Problèmes de linguistique générale 2. Gallimard, Paris
Benveniste E (1981) The semiology of language. Semiotica 37:5–23
Beyaert A (2017) Sémiotique du portrait. De Dibutade au selfie. De Boeck, Louvain-La-Neuve
Cao K et al (2020) Deep learning for facial beauty prediction. Information 11(8):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11080391
Cheng Fr (2006) Cinq méditations sur la beauté. Albin Michel, Paris
Coccia E (2015) «La morale della fotomodella. La mostra su Bettina Graziani alla Galleria Alaia», La parole et le cose. Letteratura e realtà. http://www.leparoleelecose.it/?p=17502. Accessed 21 Apr 2022
Coomaraswamy A (2017) Bellezza e verità. Saggi sull’arte cristiana e orientale. Luni Editrice, Milan
Dondero MG (2007) «Reproductibilité, faux parfaits et contrefaçons», Actes Sémiotiques [En ligne], https://www.unilim.fr/actes-semiotiques/3261. Accessed 1 Jan 2022
Dondero MG (2020) The language of images. The forms and the forces. Springer, Cham
Dondero MG (2021) Composition and decomposition in artistic portraits, scientific photography and in deepfake videos. Lexia Rivista Di Semiotica 37–38:437–453. https://doi.org/10.4399/978882553853321
Fontanille J (1989) Les espaces subjectifs. Introduction à la sémiotique de l’observateur. Hachette, Paris
Freud S (1919) The uncanny https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/freud1.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2022
Greimas AJ, Courtés J (1982) Semiotics and language: an analytical dictionary (advances in semiotics). Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Jentsch E (1906) On the psychology of the uncanny. New Ed. (1997), Angelaki 2 (1):7–16. http://www.art3idea.psu.edu/locus/Jentsch_uncanny.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2022
Jullien F (2010) Cette étrange idée du beau Chantiers II. Grasset, Paris (Biblio essais, Poche)
Leyvand T et al (2008) Data-driven enhancement of facial attractiveness. ACM Trans Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/1360612.1360637
Marin L (1993) De la représentation. Seuil, Paris
Rilke RM (2013) Poupées. Rivages Poche, Paris
Roelens N (2017) La hantise du visage chez Roland Barthes et Gilles Deleuze. In: Guido L et al (eds) Visages: histoires, représentations, créations. BHMS, Lausanne, pp 71–88
Simms EM (1996) Uncanny dolls: images of death in Rilke and Freud. New Literary Hist Lit Media Law 27(4):663–677.
Zhan et al (2020) Beauty is in the eye of the cultural beholder. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/34vsj
Acknowledgements
This paper is part of the special issue of Topoi “What’s so special about faces? Visages at the crossroad between philosophy, semiotics and cognition”, edited by Marco Viola and Massimo Leone, which results from a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No 819649-FACETS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dondero, M.G. Models, Mannequins, Dolls and Beautified Faces: A Semiotic and Philosophical Approach to the Sense of Beauty. Topoi 41, 785–793 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09809-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09809-x