Abstract
This paper aims to clarify the role the double plays in the constitution of identity, focusing on the movement between the individual and the collective level. Notably, the latter today is often considered through the lens of identity politics. The double, I argue, poses an alternative to this type of politics, by showing the interdependence of groups. As a case study, this paper focuses on the complex relationship between the anti-Semite and the Jew as depicted by Sartre. I begin with a psychoanalytical examination of the figure of the double,follow on with an analysis of Sartre's work in the light of the double, and conclude with Girard's theory of mimetic desire.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a survey of the ancient figure of the Double as a twin brother see Keppler (1972, pp. 14–26).
For a detailed account of the double see Dorfman (2020).
See Hegel (1977, pp. 114–119). Hegel’s theory had a major influence on the thought of both Lacan and Sartre through the mediation of Alexandre Kojève.
Rank (1971).
Ibid. pp. 71–74.
Ibid., p. 73.
It is noteworthy that the protagonists of doppelgänger stories are most often male. Charlotte Goodman examines female protagonists in Bildungsromane written by women novelists (e.g. Wuthering Heights), and shows that it is not another woman who plays the role of the double in these works but rather the protagonist’s brother, with whom she falls in love. See Goodman (1983).
Ibid., pp. 84–85. A similar idea is developed in Eliade (1959).
Rank (1971, p. 86).
Lacan (2007, pp. 75–82).
Ibid., p. 78.
Ibid., p. 79.
Ovid (1986, pp. 61–66).
Lacan further develops these themes in his 1948 “Aggressiveness in Psychoanalysis.” Aggressiveness, according to this text, is derived from the mirror stage and is “linked to the narcissistic relationship and to the structures of systematic misrecognition and objectification that characterize ego formation.” Lacan (2007, p. 94).
Sartre (1995).
Ibid., p. 8.
Ibid., p. 19.
Ibid., p. 7.
See Canon (1991).
Wilde (1993). See also Rank (1971, p. 78).
As we will see with Girard, when a cycle of violence starts, it is very difficult to end it, and indeed, the Nazi violence quickly expanded to include these other minorities.
For an analysis of this figure in Sartre’s text with regard to the question of universalism, see Schor (1999).
Sartre (1971, pp. 39–41).
It should be said, however, that this “head” is mostly the product of Sartre’s own imagination. In a certain sense, as Sartre himself later confessed, the Jew he depicted was his own double and mirror image, not only that of the anti-Semite and the democrat. Hammerschlag (2010, pp. 68–69), Walzer (1995). For a critical analysis of Sartre’s treatment of the Jew see Suleiman (1999).
Sartre (1995, p. 56).
Sartre (2018).
Ibid., p. 355.
Ibid., p. 356.
Ibid., pp. 712, 799.
Ibid., pp. 356–357.
Ibid., p. 359.
Ibid., p. 366.
Ibid.
Ibid.
See Freud (1919, p. 248).
Sartre (1995, pp. 64–102). Another use of this knowledge, albeit an implicit one, is presented by Homi K. Bhabha (1984) in his notion of mimicry with regard to the colonial subject. This practice could also be applied to Judith Butler’s notion of performative acts – in terms of repetition and imitation. See Butler (1990).
Sartre (1995, p. 74).
Sartre himself talks about the role of gender within Jewishness, borrowing from Wilhelm Stekel the case of a Jewish husband who is constantly aware and ashamed of the Jewishness of his wife. She therefore finds herself helpless in the face of his scornful gaze, since she can no longer deny her position as a double: “As a young girl, she was proud; everybody admired her distinguished and assured manner. Now she trembles all the time for fear of making a mistake; she fears the criticism that she reads in the eyes of her husband. . At the least mishap, he might reproach her with acting Jewish” (ibid., p. 75).
Girard (1977, pp. 49–50).
Ibid., pp. 169–190.
Ibid., p. 51.
Ibid., pp. 246, 259.
Ibid., pp. 39–49.
Ibid., pp. 160–166. In fact, for Girard, “doubles are always monstrous” (ibid., p. 162), since they uncover what Kristeva would call one’s abject origin, the lack of differences between me and myself, between me and the Other.
Ibid., pp. 166–168. See also Hardt and Negri (2004).
For an analysis of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on Girard see Farneti 2013.
References
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2009. The second sex. Trans. Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany-Chevallier. London: Jonathan Cape.
Bhabha, Homi. 1984. Of mimicry and man: the ambivalence of colonial discourse. October 28: 125–133. “.” .
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. London and New York: Routledge.
Dorfman, Eran. 2020. Double trouble: the doppelgänger from romanticism to postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge.
Cannon, Betty. 1991. Sartre and psychoanalysis: an existentialist challenge to clinical metatheory. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Eliade, Mircea. 1959. The myth of the eternal return; or, Cosmos and history. New York: Harper Torchbooks: Trans. Willard R. Trask.
Fanon, Frantz. 2008. Black skin, white masks. In Trans. Charles L. Markmann. London: Pluto Press.
Farneti, Roberto. 2013. Bipolarity redux: the mimetic context of the ‘New wars’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 26.1: 181–202. “.” .
Freud, Sigmund. 1919. “The uncanny.” The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol 17, 217–256. Trans. and ed. James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.
Girard, René. 1977. Violence and the sacred. Trans. Patrick Gregory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Goodman, Charlotte. 1983. The lost brother, the twin: women novelists and the male-female double Bildungsroman. Novel: A Forum on Fiction 17: 1: 28–43. “.” .
Hammerschlag, Sarah. 2010. The figural Jew. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A.V. Miller. New York: Oxford University Press 1977.
Keppler, Carl F. 1972. The literature of the second self. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Lacan, Jacques. 2007. Écrits. Trans. Bruce Fink. New-York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Maupassant, Guy de. 2005. The Horla. Trans. Charlotte Mandell. New York: Melville House.
Ovid. 1986. Metamorphoses. Trans. A. D. Melville. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poe, Edgar Allan. 1998. “William Wilson,” in Selected tales, 66–83. Ed. David Van Leer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prager, Dennis and Joseph Telushkin. 2003. Why the Jews?: the reason for antisemitism. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rank, Otto. 1971. The double. Trans. Harry Tucker. New York: New American Library.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1995. Anti-Semite and Jew: an exploration of the etiology of hate. Trans. George J. Becker. New York: Schocken Books.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2018. Being and nothingness. Trans. Sarah Richmond. London and New York: Routledge.
Schor, Naomi. 1999. Jews, and the universal. October 87: 107–116. “.” .
Sternhell, Zeev. 1996. Neither right nor left: fascist ideology in France. Trans. David Maisel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Suleiman, Susan. 1999. Rereading rereading: further reflections on Sartre’s ‘Réflexions’. October 87: 129–138. “” .
Walzer, Michael. 1995. “Preface. In ” Anti-Semite and Jew: an exploration of the etiology of hate. v–xxvi. New York: Schocken Books.
Wilde, Oscar. 2002. The Picture of Dorian Gray. London: Penguin Classics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dorfman, E. The Jew as a doppelgänger: the role of the double in the constitution of identity. Cont Philos Rev 55, 353–369 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-022-09582-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-022-09582-z