Abstract
In this paper, I assume, perhaps controversially, that translation into a language of formal logic is not the method by which mathematicians assess mathematical reasoning. Instead, I argue that the actual practice of analyzing, evaluating and critiquing mathematical reasoning resembles, and perhaps equates with, the practice of informal logic or argumentation theory. It doesn’t matter whether the reasoning is a full-fledged mathematical proof or merely some non-deductive mathematical justification: in either case, the methodology of assessment overlaps to a large extent with argument assessment in non-mathematical contexts. I demonstrate this claim by considering the assessment of axiomatic or deductive proofs, probabilistic evidence, computer-aided proofs, and the acceptance of axioms. I also consider Jody Azzouni’s ‘derivation indicator’ view of proofs because it places derivations—which may be thought to invoke formal logic—at the center of mathematical justificatory practice. However, when the notion of ‘derivation’ at work in Azzouni’s view is clarified, it is seen to accord with, rather than to count against, the informal logical view I support. Finally, I pose several open questions for the development of a theory of mathematical argument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberdein A. (2005) The uses of argument in mathematics. In: Hitchcock D. (eds) The uses of argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, 18–21 May 2005. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, Ontarios, pp 1–10
Aberdein A. (2007) The informal logic of mathematical proof. In: Van Bendegam J.P., Van Kerkove B. (eds) Perspectives on mathematical practices. Kluwer, Dordecht, pp 135–151
Adleman L. (1994) Molecular computation of solutions to combinatorial problems. Science, New Series 266(5187): 1021–1024
Aigner, M., & Ziegler, G. M. (2002). Proofs from the book (2nd ed.). Springer.
Allen, C., & Hand, M. (2001). Primer in logic. MIT Press.
Azzouni J. (2004) The derivation indicator view of mathematical practice. Philosophia Mathematica (3) 12: 81–105
Azzouni, J. (2006). Tracking reason. Oxford University Press.
Cáceres I., Lozana M., Saladié P. (2007) Evidence for bronze age cannibalism in El Mirador Cave (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 133: 899–917
Copi, I., & Cohen, I. (1994). Introduction to logic (9th ed.). Macmillan.
Detlefsen M. (1980) The four-color theorem and mathematical proof. The Journal of Philosophy 77: 803–820
Detlefsen M. (1992) Poincaré against the logicians. Synthese 90: 349–378
Detlefsen M. (1993) Poincaré vs. Russell on the role of logic in mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica (III) 1: 24–49
Euclid. (1956). The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements (Vol. I). Dover.
Fallis D. (1996) Mathematical proof and the reliability of DNA evidence. The American Mathematical Monthly 103(6): 191–197
Fallis D. (1997) The epistemic status of probabilistic proofs. The Journal of Philosophy 94(4): 165–186
Fallis D. (2003) Intentional gaps in mathematical proofs. Synthese 134: 45–69
Finocchiaro, M. (1996). Critical thinking, critical reasoning and methodological reflection. In M. Finocchiaro (Ed.), Arguments about arguments: Systematic, critical and historical essays in logical theory, (pp. 292–326). Cambridge University Press, 2005 (Originally published in Inquiry: Critical thinking across the disciplines 15: pp. 66–79 (1996)).
Finocchiaro, M. (2005). Dialectic, evaluation and argument: Goldman and Johnson on the concept of argument. In M. Finocchiaro (Ed.), Arguments about arguments: Systematic, critical and historical essays in logical theory, (pp. 292–326). Cambridge University Press, (Originally published in Informal Logic 23: pp. 19–49 (2003)).
Finocchiaro M. (2003) Physical-mathematical reasoning: Galileo on the extruding power of terrestrial rotation. Synthese 134: 217–244
Franklin J. (1987) Non-deductive logic in mathematics. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 38(1): 1–18
Gödel, K. (1983). What is Cantor’s continuum problem? In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam,(Eds.), Selected readings in philosophy of mathematics (pp. 470–485). Cambridge University Press, (originally published 1947).
Grootendorst, R., & van Eeemeren, F. H. (2003). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, R. H. (2000). Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Karp, R. M. (1972). Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In R. E. Miller & J. W. THatcher (Eds.), Complexity of computer computations (pp. 85–103). Plenum.
Krabbe, E. (1991). Quod erat demonstrandum: Wat kan en mag een argumentatietheorie zeggen over bewijzen? In M. M. H. Bax & W. Vuijk (Eds.), Thema’s in de Taalbeheersing: Lezingen van het VIOT-taalbeheersingscongres gehouden op 19, 20 en 21 december 1990 aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, (pp. 8–16). ICG Dordecht.
Krabbe, E. (1997). Arguments, proofs and dialogues. In M. Astroh (Ed.), Dietfried Gerhardus and Gerhard Heinzmann, (Ed.), Dialogisches Handeln: Eine Festschrift für Kuno Lorenz, (pp. 63–75). Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. [This is an updated translation of (Krabbe 1991)].
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge University Press.
Maddy, P. (1988). Believing the axioms, I and II. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53(2), 482–511 and 53(3), 736–764.
Maddy, P. (1992). Realism in mathematics. Clarendon Press.
Malone M. (2003) Three recalcitrant problems of argument identification. Informal Logic 23(3): 237–261
Mates, B. (1972). Elementary logic (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press.
Maxwell, E. A. (1959). Fallacies in mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
Polya, G. (1968). Mathematics and plausible reasoning (Vols. I and II). Princeton University Press.
Proclus. (1992). Commentary on the first book of Euclid’s Elements (G. Morrow Trans.). Princeton University Press.
Putnam, H. (1975). What is mathematical truth? In H. Putnam (Ed.), Mathematics, matter and method: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 60–78). Cambridge University Press.
Rav Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems? Philosophia Mathematica (3)7, 5–41.
Sandifer, E. (2006). Divergent series. In How Euler Did It, MAA Online.
Scriven, M. (1972). Reasoning. McGraw-Hill.
Steiner, M. (1998). The applicability of mathematics as a philosophical problem. Harvard University Press.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument, Updated Edition (of 1958). Cambridge University Press.
Tymoczko, T. (1998). The four-color problem and its philosophical significance. In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 243–268). Princeton University Press, (Originally published in Journal of Philosophy 76(2): 57–83 (1979)).
Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D., & Krabbe, E. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press.
Zermelo, E. (1908). A new proof of the possibility of well-ordering. In J. van Heijenoort (Ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931 (pp. 183–198). Harvard University Press, 1967 (Originally published in Mathematische Annalen, 65, 107–128).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dove, I.J. Towards a Theory of Mathematical Argument. Found Sci 14, 137–152 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9156-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9156-5