Skip to main content
Log in

Truth, Selection and Scientific Inquiry

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I examine various ways in whichphilosophers have made connections between truth andnatural selection. I introduce several versions ofthe view that mechanisms of true belief generationarise as a result of natural selection and argue thatthey fail to establish a connection between truth andnatural selection. I then turn to scientific truthsand argue that evolutionary accounts of the origin ofscientific truth generation mechanisms also fail. Iintroduce David Hull's selectionist model ofscientific development and argue that his account ofscientific success does not rely on connecting truthand natural selection. I argue that Hull's model,which severs the connection between truth andselection, can account for some aspects of scientificchange, but it still leaves us plenty of questionsabout what aspects of our individual cognitive make-upcontribute to scientific change and how they do so. I introduce an evolutionary approach to scientificcognition that shows how some of these questions canbe answered without making an explanatory appeal toselection for true belief generating mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, J.: 1989, Animal Behavior, Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baigrie, B.: 1988, 'Why Evolutionary Epistemology is an Endangered Theory', Social Epistemology 2, 357–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, M.: 1994, 'Epistemology from an Evolutionary Point of View', in E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • rCosmides, L. and Tooby, J.: 1994, 'Beyond Intuition and Instinct Blindness: Toward an Evolutionarily Rigorous Cognitive Science', Cognition 50, 41–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1998/1871, The Descent of Man, Prometheus Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel: 1987, The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel: 1995, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Simon and Shuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M.: 1991, Realism and Truth, 2nd edn., Blackwell Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R.: 1988, 'Rationality, Reliability and Natural Selection', Philosophy of Science 55, 218–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1986, The Shaky Game, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.: Evolutionary Biology, 3rd edn., Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: 1996, Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. and Meltzoff, A.: 1997, Words, Thoughts and Theories, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, T.: 2000, 'Evolutionary Epistemology, Social Epistemology and the Demic Structure of Science', Biology and Philosophy 15, 443–463 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths. P. and Sterelny, K.: 1999, Sex and Death, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P.: 1990, Truth, Blackwell Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1982, 'The Naked Meme', in H.C. Plotkin (ed.), Learning, Development and Culture, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 273–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1988, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1989, 'A Function for Actual Examples in Philosophy of Science', in M. Ruse (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1995, 'On Human Nature', in D.L. Hull and M. Ruse (eds.), The Philosophy of Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.: 1994, 'Natural Kinds', in H. Kornblith (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S.: 1997, How the Mind Works, W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1998, 'The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions' in J. Kourany (ed.), Scientific Knowledge, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp. 286–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse,.: 1986, Taking Darwin Seriously, Blackwell Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithurst, M.: 1995, 'Popper and the Skepticism of Evolutionary Epistemology, or, What Were Human Beings Made For?' in A. O'Hear (ed.), Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 207–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1993, Philosophy of Biology, Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1994, 'Models of Cultural Evolution', in E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E.: 1996, Without Good Reason, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K.: 1990, The Representational Theory of Mind, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K.: 1994, 'science and Selection', Biology and Philosophy 9, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S.P.: 1990, The Fragmentation of Reason, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J.: 1995, 'Popper and Darwinism', in A. O'Hear (ed.), Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Downes, S.M. Truth, Selection and Scientific Inquiry. Biology & Philosophy 15, 425–442 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006785725621

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006785725621

Keywords

Navigation