Abstract
Science is not taken for granted any longer. Society, politics and the media pose critical questions tending to censorship or at least control of science. How does science respond? It cannot exist and develop without freedom, but this does not mean freedom to amass knowledge and apply technological applications at any price and without restrictions. Science should be autonomous, but is not value-free. A distintion is made between external and internal social/ethical problems. The former refer to questions of the social/ethical context and consequences of scientific research, and the latter to the rules of ‘good practice’ and scientific integrity. The role of academies of science, and of associations of such academies (e.g. All European Academies (ALLEA)) in developing codes of good scientific practice and fostering a proper sense of scientific values and standards is further discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wolpert, L. (1999). Is science dangerous?. In: Drenth, P.J.D., J.E. Fenstad & J.D. Schiereck (eds) European science and scientists between freedom and responsibility. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 25–31.
Drenth, P.J.D. (1999). The ethical discussion: main themes and issues. In: Drenth, P.J.D., J.E. Fenstad & J.D. Schiereck (eds), European science and scientists between freedom and responsibility. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 173–186.
Drenth, P.J.D. (2002). International science and fair-play practices, Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 5–11.
McLaren, A. (1999). The ethical dilemma: the living world. In: Drenth, P.J.D., J.E. Fenstad & J.D. Schiereck (eds), European science and scientists between freedom and responsibility. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 101–107.
Deyo, R.A., Psaty, B.M., Simon, G., Wagner, E.H. & Omenn, G.S. (1997), The messenger under attack — intimidation of researchers by special-interest groups. New England Journal of Medicine, 336: 1176–1179.
Drenth, P.J.D. (1999, sec. ed.). Science: where do we draw the line? European Review 7: 239–246.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine (1995) On being a scientist; responsible conduct in research, Washington D.C.: Nat. Academy Press.
European Science Foundation (2002), Good scientific practice in research and scholarship. ESF Policy Briefing.
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie voor Wetenschappen, Verenigde Samenwerkende Nederlandse Universiteiten, Nederlandse Organisatie van Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (2001). Notitie Wetenschappelijke Integriteit: over normen van wetenschappelijk onderzoek en een Landelijk Orgaan voor Wetenschappelijke Integriteit. Amsterdam: KNAW.
ALLEA, KNAW, NWO, VSNU, (2003). Memorandum on scientific integrity. Amsterdam: ALLEA/KNAW.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drenth, P.J.D. Responsible conduct in research. SCI ENG ETHICS 12, 13–21 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022265
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022265