This article summarizes the principal arguments for panpsychism given by Charles Hartshorne by separating it from Whitehead's event metaphysics and Hartshorne's natural theology. It sorts out the plausible reasons for panpsychism given by Hartshorne from those less plausible. Among the plausible reasons are those based on analogical reasoning and the impossibility of explaining how mentality originated. Among the implausible ones are those that postulate a type of psychic causation between wholes and parts. The conclusion is that the plausible reasons tip the balance in favor of the doctrine.
CITATION STYLE
Clarke, D. S. (David S. ). (2002). Panpsychism and the Philosophy of Charles Hartshorne. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 16(3), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsp.2003.0001
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.