Skip to main content
Log in

Executive Perceptions of Superior and Subordinate Information Control: Practice versus Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines executive perceptions of business information control. Specifically, the study explores (a) whether executives perceive certain types of information control being practiced within their businesses; and, (b) whether the executives regard such practices as ethical. In essence, the study suggests that both superiors and subordinates selectively practice information control. Even more importantly, however, executives see such practices as ethically acceptable on the part of superiors but as ethically questionable on the part of subordinates. A closer look at the responding executives' profile characteristics – age, gender, education and salary – reveals the complexity of these perceptions. Most importantly, gender and age emerge as two prime factors influencing executive perceptions regarding both the practice and the ethics of information control. Suggestions for future research are included at the end of the article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, Larry D.: 1984, ‘The Seven Deadly Sins of Corporate Double Talk’, Business and Society Review (Winter), 41–44.

  • Austin, J. L.: 1975, How to Do Things With Words, 2nd ed., J. O. Urmson and J. Sbisa (eds.), (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrington, J. Owen and David J. Cherrington: 1992, ‘A Menu of Moral Issues: One Week in the Life of the Wall Street Journal’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crable, Richard E. and Stephen L. Vibbert: 1986a, ‘Managing Issues and Influencing Public Policy’, Public Relations Review 11 (Summer), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crable, Richard E. and Stephen L. Vibbert: 1986b, Public Relations as Communication Management (Bellwether Press, Edina, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T.: 1989, ‘The Corporation and Its Employees: A Case Story’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 641–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirsmith, M. W. and M. A. Covaleski: 1983, ‘Strategy, External Communications, and Environmental Context’, Strategic Management Journal 4(2), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukerich, J. M., M. L. Nichols, D. R. Elm and D. A. Vollrath: 1990, ‘Moral Reasoning in Groups: Leaders Make a Difference’, Human Relations 42, 473–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrick, J., O. C. Ferrell and W. Pride: 1989, ‘An Empirical Examination of Three Machiavellian Concepts: Advertisers vs. The General Public’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 687–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, D. E., J. L. Bradford, R. A. Meyers and J. Becker: 1989, ‘Issues Management and Organizational Accounts: An Analysis of Corporate Responses to Accusations of Unethical Business Practices’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 507–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, Robert A. and Stephen L. Payne: 1987, ‘Are Business Leaders Staging a Morality Play?’ Business and Society Review (Summer), 22–26.

  • Heath, Robert L.: 1980, ‘Corporate Advocacy: An Application of Speech Communication Perspectives and Skills and More’, Communication Education 29 (September), 370–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Robert L. and Richard Allen Nelson: 1986, Issues Management: Corporate Public Policymaking in an Information Society (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanneson, R. L.: 1975, Ethics in Human Communication (Charles E. Merrill Publishing, Columbus, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D. C. and C. O. Longenecker: 1993, ‘The Bnathsheba Syndrome: The Ethical Failure of Successful Leaders’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, William D.: 1983, ‘Corporate Double Speak: Making Bad News Look Good’, Business and Society Review (Winter), 19–22.

  • McClelland, D. E.: 1975, Power: The Inner Experience (Irvington Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olasky, Marvin N.: 1985, ‘Inside the Amoral World of Public Relations: Truth Molded for Corporate Gain’, Business and Society Review (Winter), 41–44.

  • Pompa, V.: 1992, ‘Managerial Secrecy: An Ethical Examination’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, M. L.: 1992, ‘The Emerging New Paradigm in Business’, in John Renesch (ed.), New Traditions in Business, pp. 25–51.

  • Riley, K.: 1993, ‘Telling More Than the Truth: Implicature, Speech Acts, and Ethics in Professional Communication’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Diana C.: 1993, ‘Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Directions’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudelius, W. And R. A. Bucholz: 1979, ‘Ethical Problems of Purchasing Managers’, Harvard Business Review (March–April).

  • Schick, Thomas A.: 1994/1995, ‘Truth, Accuracy (and Withholding Information)’, Public Relations Quarterly 39 (Winter), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. D.: 1987, ‘Advocacy Advertising: A Novel Communications Approach to Building Effective Relations with External Constituents’, in S. P. Sethi and C. M. Falbe (eds.), Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), pp. 551–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, Annette N.: 1985, ‘A Typology of Communication Strategies for Corporate Advocacy’, Journal of Business Strategies 2 (Spring), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dulek, R.E., Motes, W.H. & Hilton, C.B. Executive Perceptions of Superior and Subordinate Information Control: Practice versus Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1175–1184 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005705211962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005705211962

Keywords

Navigation