Skip to main content
Log in

There are\(2^{\aleph _0 } \) logics with the relevance principle betweenR andRM

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to prove the result announced by the title.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. R. Anderson andN. D. Belnap, Jr.;Entailment, vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. D. Belnap, Jr.;Entailment and relevance,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 25 (1960), 144–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. M. Dunn;Algebraic completeness results for R-mingle and its extensions,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 35 (1970), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Grātzer;Universal Algebra, Van Nostrand, Princeton, N. J. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. A. Jankov;Relationship between deducibility in the intuitionistic propositional calculus and finite implicational structures (Russian),Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 15 (1963), 1293–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Łoś andR. Suszko;Remarks on sentential logics,Indagationes Mathematicae, 20 (1958), 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. L. Maksimova;Structures with implication (Russian),Algebra i Logika, 12 (1973), 445–467.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Routley andR. K. Meyer;The semantics of entailment, in:Truth, Syntax and Modality, ed. H. Leblanc, Amsterdam, 1973, 199–243.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dziobiak, W. There are\(2^{\aleph _0 } \) logics with the relevance principle betweenR andRM . Stud Logica 42, 49–61 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418759

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418759

Keywords

Navigation