Abstract
The aim of the paper is to prove the result announced by the title.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. R. Anderson andN. D. Belnap, Jr.;Entailment, vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1975.
N. D. Belnap, Jr.;Entailment and relevance,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 25 (1960), 144–146.
J. M. Dunn;Algebraic completeness results for R-mingle and its extensions,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 35 (1970), 1–13.
G. Grātzer;Universal Algebra, Van Nostrand, Princeton, N. J. 1968.
V. A. Jankov;Relationship between deducibility in the intuitionistic propositional calculus and finite implicational structures (Russian),Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 15 (1963), 1293–1294.
J. Łoś andR. Suszko;Remarks on sentential logics,Indagationes Mathematicae, 20 (1958), 177–183.
L. L. Maksimova;Structures with implication (Russian),Algebra i Logika, 12 (1973), 445–467.
R. Routley andR. K. Meyer;The semantics of entailment, in:Truth, Syntax and Modality, ed. H. Leblanc, Amsterdam, 1973, 199–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dziobiak, W. There are\(2^{\aleph _0 } \) logics with the relevance principle betweenR andRM . Stud Logica 42, 49–61 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418759
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418759