Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cheating in Business: A Metaethical Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the managerial practice of cheating spans complex and heterogeneous situations (from deception and trickery to fraud and swindling), most business ethics scholars consider that the very idea of cheating is indefensible on moral grounds, and quickly dismiss it as wrongdoing. This paper proposes to fine-tune this conventional moral assessment by arguing that some forms of cheating can be justified—or at least excused. To do so, it starts with a value-free definition of cheating that covers a wide diversity of situations: “breaking the rules while deliberately leading or allowing others to think they have been respected.” While using this definition at the metaethical level, the paper contends that the moral assessment of cheating depends on the obligation to comply with the rules. There are rules which do not entail moral obligations, and there are special circumstances where other more important obligations override the obligation to comply with the rules. Furthermore, the paper argues that respecting the penalty rules also influences the moral assessment of cheating on the rules. The key interest of this endeavor lies in contributing to building a more solid theoretical framework for the study of cheating in management, which may replace our common prejudices and basic intuitions on this matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allhoff, F. (2003). Business bluffing reconsidered. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 283–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpern, K. D. (1988). Moral dimensions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Comments on Pastin and Hooker. In T. Donaldson & P. H. Werhane (Eds.), Ethical issues in business (pp. 54–59). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, M. (2018). Irregular immigration in Southern Europe: Actors, dynamics and governance. Cham: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1947). The summa theologica (Fathers-of-the-English-Dominican-Province, Trans.). London: Burns&Oates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A. (2005). Corruption and companies: The use of facilitating payments. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1984). Nicomachean ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2012). Virtue ethics as a resource in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1956). A plea for excuses: The presidential address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 57, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagus, P., Block, W., Eabrasu, M., Howden, D., & Rostan, J. (2011). The ethics of tax evasion. Business and Society Review, 116(3), 375–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch, D. R., & Armstrong, R. W. (2010). Ethical marginality: The Icarus syndrome and banality of wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, J. (1985). Bluffing: Its demise as a subject unto itself. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(3), 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, R. J. (1982). Political expediency and lying: Kant vs Benjamin Constant. Journal of the History of Ideas, 43(1), 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri, C. (2005). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (2008). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (2 edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomquist, J. (2010). Lying, cheating, and stealing: A study of categorical misdeeds. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1595–1605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, K. M. (1988). To stay or to leave: The moral dilemma of divestment of South African assets. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(1), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouville, M. (2010). Why is cheating wrong? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(1), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, L. (2017). The ethics of dieselgate. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 40(1), 262–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E. (2017). Business ethics: A Kantian perspective (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. (2012). Conscientious tax objection: Why the liberal state must accommodate tax resisters. Public Affairs Quarterly, 26(2), 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, W. S., & Vikram, I. S. (2011). To cheat or not to cheat? How bank debt influences the decision to misreport. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(2), 383–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnin, N., & Yu, J. (2008). The Blackwell dictionary of western philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrus, R. T., McGoldrick, K. M., & Schuhmann, P. W. (2007). Self-reports of student cheating: Does a definition of cheating matter? The Journal of Economic Education, 38(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J., Giuliano, P., & Guiso, L. (2017). Trust and cheating. The Economic Journal, 126(595), 1703–1738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C. (2009). Identity, self-awareness, and self-deception: Ethical implications for leaders and organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 393–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture: Why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead. Orlando: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. Z. (1968). Is business bluffing ethical? Harvard Business Review (January-February), 143–153.

  • Carson, T. L. (1985). Bribery, extortion, and ‘the foreign corrupt practices act’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14(1), 66–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. L. (1988). On the definition of lying: A reply to Jones and revisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(7), 509–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. L. (1993). Second thoughts about bluffing. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(4), 317–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. L. (2001). Deception and withholding information in sales. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(2), 275–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. L. (2010). Lying and deception. Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. L., Wokutch, R. E., & Murrmann, K. F. (1982). Bluffing in labor negotiations: Legal and ethical issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. D., & Dean, T. J. (2005). Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 683–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius (2013). Analects. The great learning. The doctrine of the mean (J. Legge, Trans.). Mineola: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, B. (1796). Des réactions politiques (2nd ed.). Paris.

  • Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vasquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2009). Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curzon, L. B., & Richards, P. (2007). The longman dictionary of law. London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T. (1989). There is ethics in business ethics; but there’s more as well. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 337–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, H. (1989). The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world (1st edn.). New York: Harper&Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W., Smith, N. C., & Ross, W. T. (1999). Social contracts and marketing ethics. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eabrasu, M. (2011). A praxeological assessment of subjective value. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 14(2), 216–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eabrasu, M. (2012). Towards a convergence of the ethics of tax evasion and secession. In R. McGee (Ed.), The ethics of tax evasion. Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 107–125). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eabrasu, M. (2018). Moral disagreements in business. An exploratory introduction. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebejer, J. M., & Morden, M. J. (1988). Paternalism in the marketplace: Should a salesman be his buyer’s keeper? Journal of Business Ethics, 7(5), 337–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan, A., & Shapiro, D. L. (1998). Betrayal of trust in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 547–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, T. L., Marquis, L. M., & Neal, C. S. (2013). Business ethics perspectives: Faculty plagiarism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadiman, J. A. (1986). A traveler’s guide to gifts and bribery. Harvard Business Review, 64(4), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, F. C., & Casadevall, A. (2013) Why we cheat: Scientists are unraveling the causes of fraud and dishonesty and devising new strategies for rooting them out. Scientific American Mind, 25, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, L. A., Xu, F., Atkins, R., & Caldwell, C. (2013). Ethical outcomes and business ethics: Toward improving business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 753–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, V. G., Rathore, S. S., Weinfurt, K. P., Schulman, K. A., & Sulmasy, D. P. (1999). Lying for patients: Physician deception of third-party payers. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159(19), 2263–2270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 56, 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gert, B. (2005a). Cheating. Teaching Ethics, 6(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gert, B. (2005b). Morality: Its nature and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. (1968). Metaethics and moral neutrality. Ethics, 78(3), 214–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., & Wargo, D. T. (2009). The roots of the global financial crisis are in our business schools. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 6, 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1153–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2010a). Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(S1), 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2010b). Robin Hood under the hood: Wealth-based discrimination in illicit customer help. Organization Science, 21(6), 1176–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnough, A. (2016, January 4). Many see I.R.S. penalties as more affordable than insurance. The New York Times.

  • Grasmick, H. G., Bursik, R. J. J., & Cochran, J. (1991). Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s: Religiosity and taxpayers’ inclinations to cheat. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(2), 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. M. (1991). When is ‘everyone’s doing it’ a moral justification? Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. P. (2004). Cheating. Law and Philosophy, 23(2), 137–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. P. (2007). Lying, cheating and stealing: A moral theory of white collar crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in academics and business: A cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(3), 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S. L. (1993). Lying, deceit, and subterfuge: A model of dishonesty in the workplace. Organization Science, 4(3), 478–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruzalski, B. (1981). Foreseeable consequence utilitarianism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59(2), 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. H. (1931). The ancient maxim Caveat Emptor. Yale Law Journal, 40(8), 1133–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. (1994). The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, J. (2015). Resistance to unjust immigration restrictions. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(4), 450–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. Harcourt: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honoré, A. M. (1999). Responsibility and fault. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1967). A treatise on human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Rick, S. I. (2014). Cheating more for less: Upward social comparisons motivate the poorly compensated to cheat. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Ryan, H. E. J., & Tian, Y. S. (2009). Managerial incentives and corporate fraud: The sources of incentives matter. Review of Finance, 13(1), 115–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. E. (1986). Lying and intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 5(4), 347–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan, S. (2015). Cancer patients look to India for lifesaving drugs. Retrieved July 14, 2018, from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-01/28/content_19426250.htm.

  • Kant, I. (1909). Kant’s Critique of practical reason and other works on the theory of ethics. (T. K. Abbott, Trans., 6th ed.). London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2008a). The consequences to managers for financial misrepresentation. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2008b). The cost to firms of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(3), 581–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, N. S. (2003). A libertarian theory of contract: Title transfer, binding promises, and inalienability. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 17, 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, R. W. (Ed.). (2018). Encyclopedia of business ethics and society (2nd edn.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langervoort, D. C., & Bainbridge, S. M. (2013). What were they thinking? Insider trading and the scienter requirement. In S. M. Bainbridge (Ed.), Research handbook on insider trading (pp. 52–67). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Robinson, R. (1998). Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(6), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2008). Convention: A philosophical study. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. (2015, May 21). Greenpeace accused of substitute reef ruse. The Australian.

  • Lowell, J. (2012). Managers and moral dissonance: Self justification as a big threat to ethical management? Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E. (2005). We make no promises. Philosophical Studies, 123(1–2), 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. W. (1994). Is tax evasion unethical? University of Kansas Law Review, 42(2), 411–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. W. (2006). three views on the ethics of tax evasion. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(1), 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, F. S. (1972). Promises de-moralized. Philosophical Review, 81(1), 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickiewicz, T., Rebmann, A., & Sauka, A. (2017). To pay or not to pay? Business owners’ tax morale: Testing a neo-institutional framework in a transition environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–19.

  • Migotti, M. (2003). All kinds of promises. Ethics, 114(1), 60–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (2012). Tax cheating: Illegal. But is it Immoral? Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E., Laczniak, G. R., Bowie, N. E., & Klein, T. A. (2005). Ethical marketing (Basic ethics in action). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Clery, C. (2013). The Billionaire who wasn’t: How Chuck Feeney secretly made and gave away a fortune. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paeth, S. R. (2013). The responsibility to lie and the obligation to report. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastin, M., & Hooker, M. (1980). Ethics and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Business Horizons, 23(6), 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1991). The Republic (B. Jowett, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (2017). Fairness. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, D. L. (2018). Cheating: Ethics in everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D. (2007). The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, L. M. (2005). Encyclopedia of white-collar and corporate crime. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre-McCord, G. (1989). Deception and reasons to be moral. American Philosophical Quarterly, 26(2), 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, M. E., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Fairness, feelings, and ethical decision making: consequences of violating community standards of fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca, L. A. (1932). Letters to Lucilius. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, E., Mazar, N., Alter, A. L., & Ariely, D. (2014). Financial deprivation selectively shifts moral standards and compromises moral decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. H. (2011). Business ethics (7 ed., Cengage advantage books). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkin, M. G., & McLeod, A. (2010). Why do college students cheat? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 441–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J. (2007). Cheating Ourselves: The Economics of Tax Evasion. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokol, D. K. (2007). Can deceiving patients be morally acceptable? BMJ, 334(7601), 984–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C. L. (1937). The emotive meaning of ethical terms. Mind, 46(181), 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C. L. (1938). Persuasive definitions. Mind, 47(187), 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Prooijen, J.-W., & van Lange, P. A. (2016). Cheating, corruption, and concealment: The roots of dishonesty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitek, W. (1993). Promising. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1973). Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(2), 160–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasieleski, D. M. (2008). Evolutionary psychology. In R. W. Kolb (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society (pp. 823–825). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, J. T. (2001). How virtue fits within business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. A. (2004). Globalisation, divestment and human rights in Burma. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. J. (1956). The organization man. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Damania, R. (2005). Corruption, political competition and environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49(3), 516–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wokutch, R. E., & Carson, T. (1984). The ethics and profitability of bluffing in business. In M. Hoffman & J. M. Moore (Eds.), Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality (pp. 457–462). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemach, E. M. (1973). The right to quit. The Philosophical Quarterly, 23(93), 346–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. J. (2007). The concept of moral obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I need to thank Gabriel Gimenez-Roche for his suggestions on a previous draft that greatly contributed to improving the final version of the paper. I would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their numerous constructive comments during the review process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. South Champagne Business School, 217 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 10002, Troyes Cedex, France

    Marian Eabrasu

Authors
  1. Marian Eabrasu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marian Eabrasu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eabrasu, M. Cheating in Business: A Metaethical Perspective. J Bus Ethics 162, 519–532 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4003-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4003-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation