Abstract
In contrast to Jean-Francois Lyotard’s classic warning, postmodern society in the United States seems increasingly influenced by metanarratives—religious metanarratives. This article examines the implications of this religious resurgence for educational researchers. It offers a competing analysis of the postmodern that draws on Harold Bloom, Slavoj ŽiŽek and others to identify the gnostic elements in contemporary religiosity, both in Europe and the United States. This competing reading of postmodern religiosity suggests a reframing of Lyotard’s paralogy—research that searches for instabilities in the framework of knowledge. Drawing examples from recent educational research, I will argue for ways in which researchers can better engage religion in their work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arcilla, R. V. (1992). Against polemics, for disarming communication. Philosophy of Education. http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/92_docs/Arcilla.htm (November 28, 2004).
Armstrong, K. (2000). The battle for God: Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Bernstein, R. J. (1993). The new constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Beyerlein, K. (2004). Specifying the impact of conservative Protestantism on educational attainment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43(4), 505–518.
Bloom, H. (1992). The American religion: The emergence of the post-Christian nation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Blumenberg, H. (1983). The legitimacy of the modern age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bracey, G. W. (2002). The 12th Bracey report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 135–150.
Brooks, D. (2001). Bobos in paradise: the new upper class and how they got there. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Carey, G. (2000). Preaching Christ in a broken world. Anglican Community News Service, 2193(4). http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/carey/speeches/000731.htm (November 27, 2004).
Carter, S. L. (1993). The culture of disbelief: How American law and politics trivialize religious devotion. New York: Anchor.
Casanova, J. (2001). Religion, the new millennium, and globalization. Sociology of Religion, 62(4), 415–441.
Chua, A. (2002). World on fire: how exporting free market democracy breeds ethnic hatred and global instability. New York: Doubleday.
Committee on Government Reform–Minority Staff (CGRMS). (2003). Politics and science in the Bush administration. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives. http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/features/politics_and_science/pdfs/pdf_politics_and_science_rep.pdf (November 8, 2004).
Fish, S. E. (2002). Postmodern warfare: The ignorance of our warrior intellectuals. Harper’s Magazine, 305(1826), 33–40.
Fishman, T. C. (2005). China, Inc.: how the rise of the next superpower challenges America and the world. New York: Scribner.
Fitzgerald, T. (2000). The ideology of religious studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gates, D., Jefferson, D. J., & Underwood, A. (2004). The pop prophets. Newsweek, 143(21), 44–51.
Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Gonçalves, P. (2003). Religious ‘worlds’ and their alien invaders. In: P. Goodchild (Eds), Difference in philosophy of religion (pp. 115–134). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Habermas, J. (1985). Theory of communicative action 2: Lifeworld and system. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Haydon, C. (2004). Faith, hope and funding. The Independent (12 February).
Hout, M., Greeley, M., & Wilde, M. J. (2001). The demographic imperative in religious change in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 468–500.
Johnson, L. T. (2004). A new Gnosticism. Commonweal, 131(19), 28–31.
Kramer, J. (2004). Taking the veil. New Yorker, (November 22), 59–71.
Letts, W. J., & Sears, J. T. (1999). Queering elementary education: Advancing the dialogue about sexualities and schooling. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The postmodern condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Newport, F. (2004). A look at Americans and religion today. Gallup Poll (March 23).
Stoppard, T. (1972). Jumpers. New York: Grove Press.
Suskind, R. (2004). Without a doubt. New York Times 6(1), 44 (October 17).
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1997). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Versluis, A. (2002). Voegelin’s antignosticism and the origins of totalitarianism. Telos, 124, 173–182.
Voegelin, E. (1952). The new science of politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Warnick, B. (2004). Bringing religious traditions into educational theory: making an example of Joseph Smith, Jr. Educational Theory, 54(4), 345–364.
Williams, M. (1996). Rethinking Gnosticism: An argument for dismantling a dubious category. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wuthnow, R. (2004). Still divided after all. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(9), B7.
Zelman vs. Simmons-Harris et al. (2002). United States Supreme Court http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/01pdf/00-1751.pdf (November 8, 2004).
Zembylas, M., & Michaelidis, P. (2004). The sound of silence in pedagogy. Educational Theory, 54(2), 193–210.
ŽiŽek, S. (2000). Melancholy and the act. Critical Inquiry, 26(4), 657–681.
ŽiŽek, S. (2001). On belief. London: Routledge.
ŽiŽek, S. (2003). The puppet and the dwarf: The perverse core of Christianity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewer who brought to his attention additional texts and debates about this highly interdisciplinary topic.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edgoose, J. Where creeds meet incredulity: educational research in a post-utopian age. Stud Philos Educ 25, 289–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-9003-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-9003-5