Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of Inattentional Blindness for "Enactive'' Theories of Consciousness

  • Published:
Brain and Mind

Abstract

Mack and Rock show evidence that no consciousperception occurs without a prior attentiveact. Subjects already executing attention taskstend to neglect visible elements extraneous tothe attentional task, apparently lacking evenbetter-than-chance ``implicit perception,''except in certain cases where the unattendedstimulus is a meaningful word or has uniquepre-tuned salience similar to that ofmeaningful words. This is highly consistentwith ``enactive'' notions that consciousnessrequires selective attention viaemotional subcortical and limbic motivationalactivation as it influences anterior attentionmechanisms. Occipital activation withoutconsciousness suggests that motivated search,enacted through the organism's subcorticalmotivational functions, is needed beforevisual stimulation engenders consciousness.This enactive view – that searching for,rather than receiving or processing input isthe basis of consciousness – was slow ingaining acceptance lacking empirical evidenceof this kind, combined with thestimulus-response assumption that brain eventssubserving perceptual consciousness must resultfrom transformation of perceptual input ratherthan from the organism's self-regulatedactivity as manifested through subcorticalactivity. Implicit perception occurring withword priming is ``paradoxical'' according to Mackand Rock, suggesting late selection forattention after extensive unconsciousprocessing, while most trials involvingnonverbal rather than verbal images mightsuggest earlier selection, sinceunattended objects are unseen, apparently evenimplicitly. This paper argues that anteriorand subcortical motivational mechanisms play animportant role in early selection; posteriormechanisms then unconsciously enhance signals;if data survive early gating andcorticothalamic enhancement, then still furtheranterior-limbic loops motivatedlyactivate ``image schemas'' resonating withposterior nonconscious processing; at thatpoint, consciousness occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aurell, Carl G., 1984: Perception: A model comprising two modes of consciousness. Addendum II: Emotion incorporated, Perceptual and Motor Skills 59, 180-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aurell, Carl G., 1989: Man's triune conscious mind, Perceptual and Motor Skills 68, 747-754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barresi, J. andMoore, C., 1996: Intentional relations and social Understanding, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 91, 107-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M.,Stiehl, S. andBickle, J., 2000: The effect of motivation on the stream of consciousness: Generalizing from a neurocomputational model of cingulo-frontal circuits controlling saccadic eye movements, in Ellis and Newton (2000a).

  • Bickhard, M., 2000: Motivation and emotion: An interactive process model, in R.D. Ellis andN. Newton (eds), The Caldron of Consciousness: Affect, Motivation and Self-organization, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 161-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickle, J.,Bernstein, M.,Heatley, M.,Worley, C. andStiehl, S., 1999: A functional hypothesis for LGN-V1-TRN connectivities suggested by computer simulation, Journal of Computational Neuroscience 6, 251-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, G., 1998: Review of R.D. Ellis, Questioning Consciousness: The Interplay of Imagery, Cognition and Emotion in the Human Brain (John Benjamins), at Darwin and Darwinism website, www.human-nature.com/darwin/index.html.

  • Clark, A., 1997: Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A., 1994: Descartes’ Error, Putnam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A., 1999: The Feeling of What Happens, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D., 1991: Consciousness Explained, Little Brown and Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D., 1986: An Ontology of Consciousness, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D., 1995: Questioning Consciousness: The Interplay of Imagery, Cognition and Emotion in the Human Brain, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D., 1999a: Why isn't consciousness empirically observable? Emotion, self-organization, and nonreductive physicalism, Journal of Mind and Behavior 20, 391-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D., 1999b: Dynamical systems as an approach to consciousness: Emotion, self-organization, and the mind-body problem, New Ideas in Psychology 17, 237-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D., 2000: Consciousness, self-organization, and the process-substratum relation: rethinking nonreductive physicalism, Philosophical Psychology 13, 173-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D., 2001: Can dynamical systems explain mental causation? Journal of Mind and Behavior 22, 311-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D. andNewton, N., 1998: Three paradoxes of phenomenal consciousness: Bridging the explanatory gap, Journal of Consciousness Studies 5, 419-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D. andNewton, N. (eds), 2000a: The Caldron of Consciousness: Affect, Motivation, and Self-organization, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D. andNewton, N., 2000b: The interdependence of consciousness and emotion, Consciousness & Emotion 1, 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faw, B., 1997: Outlining a brain model of mental imaging abilities, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 3, 282-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faw, B., 2000: Consciousness, motivation, and emotion: Biopsychological reflections, in Ellis and Newton (2000a), pp. 55-90.

  • Gallant, J.L.,Conner, C.E. andvan Essen, D.C., 1998: Neural activity in areas V1, V2, and V4 during free viewing of natural scenes compared to controlled viewing. Forthcoming in NeuroReports 9.

  • Gazzaniga, M. (ed.), 2000: The New Cognitive Neurosciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, Nicholas, 2000: How to solve the mind-body problem, Journal of Consciousness Studies 7, 5-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R., 1997: How language helps us thing, Pragmatics & Cognition 4, 1-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S., 1993: The Origins of Order, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J., 1996: The Emotional Brain, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A.R., 1980: Higher Cortical Functions in Man, 2nd ed., Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Cormack, E. andStamenov, M. (eds), 1996: Fractals of Brain, Fractals of Mind, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A. andRock, I., 1998: Inattentional Blindness, MIT/Bradford, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, D.E. andBahill, A.T., 1985: Learning to track predictable target waveforms without a time delay, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 26, 932-937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. andGopnik, A., 1993: The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing theories of mind, in S. Baron-Cohen,H. Tager-Flusberg, andD. Cohen (eds), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Autism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 335-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J., 1971: Chance and Necessity, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natsoulas, T., 1993: What is wrong with appendage theory of consciousness, Philosophical Psychology 6, 137-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, N., 1993: The sensorimotor theory of cognition, Pragmatics & Cognition 1, 267-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, N., 1996: Foundations of Understanding, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, C., 2001: Review of R.D. Ellis andN. Newton (eds), The Caldron of Consciousness (John Benjamins), Journal of Consciousness Studies 8, pp. 76-78.

  • Panksepp, J., 1998: Affective Neuroscience, Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M.I. andRothbart, M.K., 1992: Attentional mechanisms and conscious experience, in A.D. Milner andM.D. Rugg (eds), The Neuropsychology of Consciousness, Academic Press, London, pp. 187-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z., 1973: What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain, Psychological Bulletin 80, 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, E., 1999: The Brain and Emotion, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runeson, S., 1974: Constant velocity-not perceived as such, Psychological Research 37, 3-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J., 2000: Consciousness, free action, and the brain, Journal of Consciousness Studies 7, 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srebro, R., 1985: Localization of visually evoked cortical activity in humans, Journal of Physiology 360, 233-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A.M., 1964: Selective attention in man, British Medical Bulletin 20, 12-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.,Thompson, E. andRosch, E., 1993: The Embodied Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, D., 1998: Affect and the ‘hard problem’ neurodevelopmental and corticolimbic network issues, Consciousness Research Abstracts: Toward a Science of Consciousness, Tucson 1998, 91-92.

  • Watt, D., 2000: The centrencephalon and thalamocortical integration: Neglected contributions of periaqueductal gray, Consciousness & Emotion 1, 91-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiskrantz, L., 1986: Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellis, R.D. Implications of Inattentional Blindness for "Enactive'' Theories of Consciousness. Brain and Mind 2, 297–322 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014406206557

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014406206557

Navigation