Abstract
Theories of ethical decision making assume it is a process that is special, or different in some regard, from typical individual decision making. Empirical results of the most widely known theories in the field of business ethics contain numerous inconsistencies and contradictions. In an attempt to assess why we continue to lack understanding of how individuals make ethical decisions at work, an inductive study of ethical decision making was conducted. The results of this preliminary study suggest that ethical decision making might not be meaningfully “special” or different from other decision making processes. The implications of this research are potentially significant in that they challenge the fundamental assumption of existing ethical decision making research. This research could serve as an impetus for further examination of whether ethical decision making is meaningfully different from other decision making processes. Such studies could create new directions for the field of business ethics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Baker, C. R. (2008). Moral reasoning and questionable behavior: A study of extensive copying from the Internet by accounting students. CPA Journal, 58(11), 58–61.
Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (1999). Sex differences in business ethics: The importance of perceptions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11(4), 454–474.
Barnett, T., & Valentine, S. (2004). Issue contingencies and marketers’ recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 338–346.
Bebeau, M. J., Rest, J. R., & Yamoor, C. M. (1985). Measuring dental students ethical sensitivity. Journal of Dental Education, 49, 225–235.
Bird, F. (1996). The muted conscience: Moral silence and the practice of ethics in business. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, T. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brady, F., & Wheeler, G. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 927–940.
Brierley, J. A., & Cowton, C. J. (2000). Putting meta-analysis to work: Accountants’ organizational professional conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(2), 343–353.
Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53, 981–1018.
Cameron, K., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Kohler.
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2002). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical-decision-making: Assessing the relevance of orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(1), 15–30.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Chia, A., & Mee, L. S. (2000). The effects of issue characteristics on the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 255–269.
Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crary, A. (2007). Beyond moral judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Damasio, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond automatically to social stimuli. Behavioral Brain Research, 41, 81–94.
Davis, M. A., Andersen, M. G., & Curtis, M. B. (2001). Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: A critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 35–53.
Davis, M., Johnson, N., & Ohmer, D. (1998). Issue contingent effects on ethical decision-making: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 373–389.
DeConinck, J. B., & Lewis, W. F. (1997). The influence of deontological and teleological considerations and ethical climate on sales managers’ intentions to reward or punish sales force behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(5), 497–506.
Derry, R. (1989). An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(11), 855–862.
Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121.
Elm, D. R., & Nichols, M. L. (1993). An investigation of the moral reasoning of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 817–873.
Fernandes, M. F., & Randall, D. M. (1992). The nature of social desirability response effects in ethics research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(2), 183–205.
Flannery, B. L., & May, D. R. (2000). Environmental ethical decision-making in the U. S. metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 642–662.
Forsyth, D. R. (1985). Individual differences in information integration during moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 264–272.
Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
Frey, B. F. (2000). The impact of moral intensity o decision-making in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 181–195.
Gibbs, J. C. (1991). Toward an integration of Kohlberg’s and Hoffman’s theories of morality. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Volume I, advances in theory, research and applications (pp. 183–222). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gino, F., Moore, D. A., & Bazerman, M. (2008). No harm, no foul: The outcome bias in ethical judgments. Carnegie Mellon University Working Paper Series, Philadelphia, PA.
Glazer, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Glover, S. H., Bumpus, M. A., Logan, J. E., & Ciesla, J. R. (1997). Re-examining the influence of individual values on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12/13), 1319–1329.
Greene, J. D. (2011). The moral brain and how to use it. New York: Penguin.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
Harrington, S. J. (1997). A test of person-issue contingent model of ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 363–375.
Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Ecco/HarperCollins.
Jones, T. (1991). Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(12), 366–395.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.
Kelley, P. C., & Elm, D. R. (2003). The effect of context on moral intensity of ethical issues: Revising Jones’ issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 139–154.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence. The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The meaning & measurement of moral development. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Kujala, J. (2001). A multidimensional approach to Finnish managers’ moral decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 231–254.
Lietsch, D. L. (2004). Differences in perceptions of moral intensity in the moral decision process: An empirical examination of accounting students. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 313–323.
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marshall, B., & Dewe, P. (1997). An investigation of the components of moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(5), 521–530.
Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1/2), 36–50.
May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in decision-making. Business & Society, 41, 84–117.
McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2006). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 335–357.
Messick, D., & Bazerman, M. (1996). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Sloan Management Review, 37, 9–22.
Moe, T., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.
Morris, S. A., & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 715–726.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.
Paine, L. S. (2004). Value shift: Why companies must merge social and financial imperatives to achieve superior performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2008). A person-situation interactionist framework to account for ethical blindness. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.
Rallapalli, K. C., Vitell, S. J., & Barnes, J. H. (1998). The influence of norms on ethical judgments and intentions: An empirical study of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 43(3), 157–168.
Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rest, J. (1979). Moral development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Rest, J. R., Barnett, R., Bebeau, M., Deemer, E., Getz, I., Moon, Y., et al. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger Press.
Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233–243.
Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. (2006). The effects of diverse ethical predispositions on group ethical decision-making. Working paper, University of Washington.
Robertson, D. (1993). Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(8), 585–599.
Robertson, D., Snarey, J., Ousley, O., Harenski, K., Bowman, F. D., Gilkey, R., et al. (2007). The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 755–766.
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1190–1207.
Scott, E. D. (2000). Moral values: Situationally defined individual difference. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(2), 497–521.
Shaub, M. K. (1997). Commentary on the relationship between and individual’s values and perceptions of moral intensity: An empirical study. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9, 41–49.
Singer, M. (1996). The role of moral intensity and fairness perception in judgments of ethicality: A comparison of managerial professionals and the general public. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(4), 469–474.
Singhapadki, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and moral decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.
Sparks, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62, 96–109.
Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.
Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K., & McCabe, D. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.
Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ethics/business ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 113–128.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), S251–S278.
Vardi, Y. (2001). The effects of organizational and ethical climates on misconduct at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4), 325–337.
Warren, D. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 622–632.
Weber, J. (1990). Managers’ moral reasoning: Assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations, 43, 228–236.
Weber, J. (1996). Influences upon managerial moral decision-making: Nature of harm and magnitude of consequences. Human Relations, 49, 1–22.
Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. (2001). Investigating influences on managers’ moral reasoning: The impact of context and personal and organizational factors. Business & Society, 40(1), 79–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elm, D.R., Radin, T.J. Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different?. J Bus Ethics 107, 313–329 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1041-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1041-4