Abstract
We sought to expand on the concept of the moral self to include not just the duty to develop the moral self but the moral duty to develop the self in both moral and non-moral ways. To do this, we focused on how leaders can promote a climate in which individuals feel a sense of duty to develop themselves for the betterment of the team and organization. In our theoretical model, duty orientation plays a key role in determining whether followers will seek performance feedback to develop their work selves. We hypothesized that followers with ethical leaders would experience a greater sense of duty to improve themselves and would therefore be more likely to seek and less likely to avoid leader feedback. Drawing on social learning theory, we hypothesized that (a) duty orientation would mediate the relationship between ethical leadership and feedback-seeking/feedback-avoiding behavior, (b) expert power would moderate the relationship between ethical leadership and duty orientation such that duty orientation would be higher when followers perceived their leader to be both highly ethical and competent, and (c) expert power would moderate the indirect effect of ethical leadership on feedback-seeking/feedback-avoiding behavior through duty orientation. We tested our hypotheses using a sample of 249 followers across two waves of data collection. Results suggest that ethical leadership and leader competence interact to drive followers’ duty orientation, thereby reducing followers’ feedback-avoiding behaviors. Further, ethical leadership had a direct positive relationship with followers’ feedback-seeking behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We also performed all analyses excluding AL as a control variable. The results concerning the level of significance between constructs do not change. Results of these analyses are available from the authors upon request.
Because of the high correlations among ethical leadership, authentic leadership, and leaders’ expert power, we conducted a test of heteroskedasticity when testing our hypotheses. Specifically, we used Glejserm test (1969), which is an effective test and could be performed in SPSS. The results suggested that there are no serious heteroskedasticity problems in our model and data. Full results are available from the authors upon request.
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand oaks: Sage.
Albright, M. D., & Levy, P. E. (1995). The effects of source credibility and performance rating discrepancy on reactions to multiple raters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(7), 577–600.
AlKerdawy, M. M. A. (2014). The mediating effects of duty orientation on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior in the public banks of Egypt. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(8), 155–169.
Anseel, F., Beatty, A. S., Shen, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management, 41(1), 318–348.
Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 465–487.
Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(3), 370–389.
Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58(1), 67–79.
Ashford, S. J., De Stobbeleir, K., & Nujella, M. (2016). To seek or not to seek: Is that the only question? Recent developments in feedback-seeking literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 213–239.
Atinc, G., Simmering, M. J., & Kroll, M. J. (2012). Control variable use and reporting in macro and micro management research. Organization Research Methods, 15(1), 57–74.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2009). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.
Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536.
Beller, S. (2008). Deontic norms, deontic reasoning, and deontic conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning, 14(4), 305–341.
Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 241–255.
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283.
Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.
Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.
Button, S., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26–48.
Davis, T. R., & Luthans, F. (1980). A social learning approach to organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 281–290.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and follower voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.
Elangovan, A. R., & Xie, J. L. (1999). Effects of perceived power of leader on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 359–373.
Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305–323.
Fedor, D. B., Rensvold, R. B., & Adams, S. M. (1992). An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: A longitudinal field study. Personnel Psychology, 45(4), 779–805.
Folger, R. (2012). Deonance: Behavioral ethics and moral obligation. In D. De Cremer & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: Shaping an emerging field (pp. 121–139). New York: Routledge.
Folger, R., Ganegoda, D., Rice, D., Taylor, R., & Wo, H. (2013). Bounded autonomy and behavioral ethics: Deonance and reactance as competing motives. Human Relations, 66(7), 905–924.
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 150–167). New York: Harper & Row.
Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120–1145.
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 572–580.
Glejser, H. (1969). A new test for heteroscedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(325), 316–323.
Hannah, S. T., Jennings, P. L., Bluhm, D., Peng, A. C., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2014a). Duty orientation: Theoretical development and preliminary construct testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 220–238.
Hannah, S. T., Sumanth, J. J., Lester, P., & Cavarretta, F. (2014b). Debunking the false dichotomy of leadership idealism and pragmatism: Critical evaluation and support of newer genre leadership theories. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(5), 598–621.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 561–567.
Hollander, E. P. (1992). Leadership, followership, self, and others. Leadership Quarterly, 3(1), 43–54.
Hollenbeck, G. P. (2009). Executive selection–What’s right, and what’s wrong. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2(2), 130–143.
House, R. J., & Baetz, M. L. (1979). Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 341–384.
Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research methods in social relations (7th. Ed.). London: Thomas Learning.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349–371.
Jennings, P. L., Mitchell, M. S., & Hannah, S. T. (2015). The moral self: A review and integration of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S104–S168.
Johnson, R. N. (2011). Self-improvement: An essay in Kantian ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I., & Korsgaard, C. (1998). Kant: groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy) (M. Gregor (Ed.)). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B., & Mckee-Ryan, F. M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees’ response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1057–1069.
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L., & Sels, L. (2012). Authentic leadership, authentic followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level study. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1677–1697.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173.
Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343–378.
Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1981). Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 105–113.
Martinko, M. J., Mackey, J. D., Moss, S. E., Harvey, P., McAllister, C., & Brees, J. R. (2018). An exploration of the role of subordinate affect in leader evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 738–752.
Morrison, E. W., & Bies, R. J. (1991). Impression management in the feedback-seeking process: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 522–541.
Moss, S. E., & Sanchez, J. I. (2004). Are your followers avoiding you? Managerial strategies for closing the feedback gap. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 32–44.
Moss, S. E., Sanchez, J. I., Brumbaugh, A. M., & Borkowski, N. (2009). The mediating role of feedback avoidance behavior in the LMX-performance relationship. Group & Organization Management, 34(6), 645–664.
Moss, S. E., Valenzi, E. R., & Taggart, W. (2003). Are you hiding from your boss? The development of a taxonomy and instrument to assess the feedback management behaviors of good and bad performers. Journal of Management, 29(4), 487–510.
Newman, A., Kiazad, K., Miao, Q., & Cooper, B. (2014). Examining the cognitive and affective trust-based mechanisms underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and organisational citizenship: A case of the head leading the heart? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 113–123.
Pan, S.-Y., & Lin, K. J. (2015). Behavioral mechanism and boundary conditions of transformational process. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 970–985.
Plato. (2003). The republic. Penguin Books. H. D. P. Lee (Trans.) (Original work published 380 BC).
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Posner, B. Z., & Kouzes, J. M. (1988). Relating leadership and credibility. Psychological Reports, 63(2), 527–530.
Preacher, K. G., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
Qian, J., Lin, X., & Chen, G. Z.-X. (2012). Authentic leadership and feedback-seeking behaviour: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(3), 286–299.
Reiley, P., & Jacobs, R. (2016). Ethics matter: Moderating leaders’ power use and followers’ citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 69–81.
Renn, R. W., & Fedor, D. B. (2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self- efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management, 27(5), 563–583.
Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456–476.
Steelman, L., Levy, P., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale (FES): Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165–184.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2012). Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and follower voice. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 251–282.
Teunissen, P. W., Stapel, D. A., van der Vleuten, C., Scherpbier, A., Boor, K., & Scheele, F. (2009). Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behaviour in relation to night shifts. Academic Medicine, 84(7), 910–917.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.
VandeWalle, D. M. (1996). Are our students trying to prove or improve their ability? Development and validation of an instrument to measure academic goal orientation. Paper presented at the 1996 Academy of Management national meeting, Cincinnati, OH.
VandeWalle, D. M. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 581–604.
VandeWalle, D. M., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 390–400.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.
Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and follower voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286.
Whitaker, B. G., Dahling, J. J., & Levy, P. (2007). The development of a feedback environment and role clarity model of job performance. Journal of Management, 33(4), 570–591.
Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. (2012). Linking feedback quality and goal orientation to feedback seeking and job performance. Human Performance, 25(2), 159–178.
Whitman, M. V., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Holmes, O. (2014). Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 38–53.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Sherry E. Moss declares that she has no conflict of interest. Meng Song received research Grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71802013) and The Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science Project (Grant No. 17YJC630125). Sean T. Hannah declares that he has no conflict of interest. Zhen Wang declares that he has no conflict of interest. John J. Sumanth declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moss, S.E., Song, M., Hannah, S.T. et al. The Duty to Improve Oneself: How Duty Orientation Mediates the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Feedback-Seeking and Feedback-Avoiding Behavior. J Bus Ethics 165, 615–631 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4095-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4095-8