Skip to main content
Log in

The semantic approach to evolutionary theory

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paul Thompson, John Beatty, and Elisabeth Lloyd argue that attempts to resolve certain conceptual issues within evolutionary biology have failed because of a general adherence to the received view of scientific theories. They maintain that such issues can be clarified and resolved when one adopts a semantic approach to theories. In this paper, I argue that such conceptual issues are just as problematic on a semantic approach. Such issues arise from the complexity involved in providing formal accounts of theoretical laws and scientific explanations. That complexity is due to empirical and pragmatic considerations, not one's adherence to a particular formal approach to theories. This analysis raises a broader question. How can any formal account properly represent the complex nature of empirical phenomena?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achinstein, P.: 1968,Concept of Science, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1980, ‘Optimal-Designing Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology’,Philosophy of Science 47, 532–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1981, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?’, in P. Asquith and R. Giere (eds.),PSA 1980, Vol. 2., Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1987, ‘On Behalf of the Semantic View’,Biology & Philosophy 2, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1966,Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.: 1979, ‘Genes that Violate Mendel's Rules’,Scientific American 240(2), 134–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.: 1983,Genetics Notes, Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982,The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1970,Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1977, ‘The Laws of Nature’,Philosophy of Science 44, 248–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky, M.: forthcoming, ‘The Historical Nature of Evolutionary Theory’, in M. Nitecki (ed.),History and Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Ghiselin, M.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’,Systematic Zoology 23, 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1979,Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1988,Explaining Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.: 1965,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1965, ‘The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15, 314–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’,Systematic Zoology 25, 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’,Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.: 1984, ‘A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics’,Philosophy of Science 50, 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.: 1986, ‘Evaluation of Evidence in Group Selection Debates’, in A. Fine and P. Kitcher (eds.),PSA 1986, Vol. 1., Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 483–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.: 1987, ‘Confirmation of Ecological and Evolutionary Models’,Biology & Philosophy 2, 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.: 1988,The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory, Greenwood Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. and Wilson, E.: 1981,Genes, Mind and Culture, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1970,Populations, Species, and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961,The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1979,Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd ed., Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1962, ‘What Theories Are Not’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A Tarski (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp. 240–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1973,The Philosophy of Biology, Hutchinson and Company, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1986,Taking Darwin Seriously, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1969, ‘Correspondence Rules’,Philosophy of Science 36, 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloep, P. and Van de Steen, M.: 1987, ‘The Nature of Evolutionary Theory: The Semantic Challenge’,Biology & Philosophy 2, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1963,Philosophy and Scientific Realism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1968,Between Philosophy and Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1980, ‘Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism’,Philosophy of Science 47, 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1989, ‘Is the Theory of Natural Selection Unprincipled? A Reply to Shimony’,Biology & Philosophy 4, 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1972, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View of the Structure of Scientific Theories?’,Philosophy of Science 39, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1977, ‘The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed., The University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1979, ‘Theory Structure’, in P. D. Asquith and H. E. Kyburg (eds.),Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: forthcoming,The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

  • Suppes, P.: 1962, ‘Models of Data’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes and A Tarski (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1967, ‘What Is a Scientific Theory?’, in S. Morgenbesser (ed.),Philosophy of Science Basic Books, New York, pp. 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.: 1983, ‘The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: A Semantic Approach’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14, 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.: 1985, ‘Sociobiological Explanation and the Testability of Sociobiological Theory’, in J. Fetzer (ed.),Sociobiology and Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.: 1986, ‘The Interaction of Theories and the Semantic Conception of Evolutionary Theory’,Philosophica 37, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.: 1987, ‘A Defence of the Semantic Conception of Evolutionary Theory’,Biology & Philosophy 2, 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.: 1989,The Structure of Biological Theories, SUNY Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1970, ‘On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories’,Philosophy of Science 37, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, K.: unpublished, ‘Universal Laws of Biology’, presented to the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division Meeting, December 1989.

  • Wessels, L.: 1976, ‘Laws and Meaning Postulates (In van Fraassen's View of Theories)’, in R. Cohen and C. Hooker (eds.),PSA 1974, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 215–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.: 1970, ‘Deducing the Consequences of Evolution’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 29, 343–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.: 1985, ‘Species Are Individuals’,Philosophy of Science 52, 578–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ereshefsky, M. The semantic approach to evolutionary theory. Biol Philos 6, 59–80 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426826

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426826

Key words

Navigation