Abstract
Paul Thompson, John Beatty, and Elisabeth Lloyd argue that attempts to resolve certain conceptual issues within evolutionary biology have failed because of a general adherence to the received view of scientific theories. They maintain that such issues can be clarified and resolved when one adopts a semantic approach to theories. In this paper, I argue that such conceptual issues are just as problematic on a semantic approach. Such issues arise from the complexity involved in providing formal accounts of theoretical laws and scientific explanations. That complexity is due to empirical and pragmatic considerations, not one's adherence to a particular formal approach to theories. This analysis raises a broader question. How can any formal account properly represent the complex nature of empirical phenomena?
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achinstein, P.: 1968,Concept of Science, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
Beatty, J.: 1980, ‘Optimal-Designing Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology’,Philosophy of Science 47, 532–561.
Beatty, J.: 1981, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?’, in P. Asquith and R. Giere (eds.),PSA 1980, Vol. 2., Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing.
Beatty, J.: 1987, ‘On Behalf of the Semantic View’,Biology & Philosophy 2, 17–23.
Carnap, R.: 1966,Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Basic Books, New York.
Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Basic Books, New York.
Crow, J.: 1979, ‘Genes that Violate Mendel's Rules’,Scientific American 240(2), 134–146.
Crow, J.: 1983,Genetics Notes, Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis.
Dawkins, R.: 1982,The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, Freeman, San Francisco.
Dobzhansky, T.: 1970,Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.
Dretske, F.: 1977, ‘The Laws of Nature’,Philosophy of Science 44, 248–268.
Ereshefsky, M.: forthcoming, ‘The Historical Nature of Evolutionary Theory’, in M. Nitecki (ed.),History and Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Ghiselin, M.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’,Systematic Zoology 23, 127–143.
Giere, R.: 1979,Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.
Giere, R.: 1988,Explaining Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hempel, C.: 1965,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.
Hull, D.: 1965, ‘The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15, 314–326.
Hull, D.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’,Systematic Zoology 25, 174–191.
Hull, D.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’,Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.
Lloyd, E.: 1984, ‘A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics’,Philosophy of Science 50, 112–129.
Lloyd, E.: 1986, ‘Evaluation of Evidence in Group Selection Debates’, in A. Fine and P. Kitcher (eds.),PSA 1986, Vol. 1., Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 483–493.
Lloyd, E.: 1987, ‘Confirmation of Ecological and Evolutionary Models’,Biology & Philosophy 2, 277–293.
Lloyd, E.: 1988,The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory, Greenwood Press, New York.
Lumsden, C. and Wilson, E.: 1981,Genes, Mind and Culture, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Mayr, E.: 1970,Populations, Species, and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Nagel, E.: 1961,The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
Popper, K.: 1979,Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd ed., Clarendon, Oxford.
Putnam, H.: 1962, ‘What Theories Are Not’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A Tarski (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp. 240–251.
Ruse, M.: 1973,The Philosophy of Biology, Hutchinson and Company, London.
Ruse, M.: 1986,Taking Darwin Seriously, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Schaffner, K.: 1969, ‘Correspondence Rules’,Philosophy of Science 36, 280–290.
Sloep, P. and Van de Steen, M.: 1987, ‘The Nature of Evolutionary Theory: The Semantic Challenge’,Biology & Philosophy 2, 1–16.
Smart, J. J. C.: 1963,Philosophy and Scientific Realism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Smart, J. J. C.: 1968,Between Philosophy and Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Sober, E.: 1980, ‘Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism’,Philosophy of Science 47, 350–383.
Sober, E.: 1989, ‘Is the Theory of Natural Selection Unprincipled? A Reply to Shimony’,Biology & Philosophy 4, 275–280.
Suppe, F.: 1972, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View of the Structure of Scientific Theories?’,Philosophy of Science 39, 1–19.
Suppe, F.: 1977, ‘The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed., The University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Suppe, F.: 1979, ‘Theory Structure’, in P. D. Asquith and H. E. Kyburg (eds.),Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 317–338.
Suppe, F.: forthcoming,The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Suppes, P.: 1962, ‘Models of Data’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes and A Tarski (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.
Suppes, P.: 1967, ‘What Is a Scientific Theory?’, in S. Morgenbesser (ed.),Philosophy of Science Basic Books, New York, pp. 55–67.
Thompson, P.: 1983, ‘The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: A Semantic Approach’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14, 215–229.
Thompson, P.: 1985, ‘Sociobiological Explanation and the Testability of Sociobiological Theory’, in J. Fetzer (ed.),Sociobiology and Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 201–215.
Thompson, P.: 1986, ‘The Interaction of Theories and the Semantic Conception of Evolutionary Theory’,Philosophica 37, 73–86.
Thompson, P.: 1987, ‘A Defence of the Semantic Conception of Evolutionary Theory’,Biology & Philosophy 2, 26–32.
Thompson, P.: 1989,The Structure of Biological Theories, SUNY Press, Albany.
van Fraassen, B.: 1970, ‘On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories’,Philosophy of Science 37, 325–339.
van Fraassen, B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, New York.
Waters, K.: unpublished, ‘Universal Laws of Biology’, presented to the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division Meeting, December 1989.
Wessels, L.: 1976, ‘Laws and Meaning Postulates (In van Fraassen's View of Theories)’, in R. Cohen and C. Hooker (eds.),PSA 1974, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 215–259.
Williams, M.: 1970, ‘Deducing the Consequences of Evolution’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 29, 343–385.
Williams, M.: 1985, ‘Species Are Individuals’,Philosophy of Science 52, 578–590.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ereshefsky, M. The semantic approach to evolutionary theory. Biol Philos 6, 59–80 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426826
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426826