Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of “the insufficiency of now” that stems from the entanglement of education with time. Namely, the embodied-lived present is always inferior compared to the hypothetical ideal future. Education and its promise hence carry the seed of inevitable disenchantment. This problem is examined based on two contrasting perspectives: Plato’s cave allegory and its application to contemporary schooling on the one hand and the Yogacara Buddhist “mind-moments” model on the other hand. The insufficiency of now emerges from both models in different ways; however, the latter model accentuates the mind’s role in its formation. The paper then describes mindfulness practice in light of the latter model, and suggests that it may be a necessary pedagogy for addressing a problem that is inherent in the concept of education and in the mind. However, the teaching of mindfulness itself has to overcome the present/future dualism that is the basis for the insufficiency of now.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To some degree the untrained mind reflects some of the appetites described in book IX of Plato's Republic. That is, hunger, thirst, sex, etc. prevent the soul's harmony, which is achieved only when the voice of reason takes over. However, Buddhism offers a far more complex concept of mind and the processes of perception, in which what Plato referred to as appetites would be broken down into various types and distinctions (Olendzki 2011). Furthermore, the idea of "soul" as a stable inner essence would make a serious juxtaposition here quite difficult given that Buddhist schools of thought would not adhere to such view.
These can be further elaborated because the sense of touch, for example does not merely entail touching external objects, but also includes our sensed embodiment (proprioception), and sensations of balance/imbalance, pressure, temperature and so forth. Some senses offer different types of mind-moments that are generalized under the name of that particular sense.
A similar point was made by Higgins (2017): "What we bring from the past (our store of meanings, our diet of questions, our vectors of interest, our weights and measures) simultaneously opens the present to us as a space of productive encounter and limits this moment to the present of this past" (p. 540). We can further accentuate this limitation as involving the present of this future; that is, the subordination of A to B, the present as a means for the future.
References
Arendt, H. 1971. The life of the mind. San Diego: Harcourt Inc.
Biesta, G. 2009. Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21(1): 33–46.
Deresiewicz, W. 2015. Excellent sheep: The miseducation of the American elite and the way to a meaningful life. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Dewey, J. 1980. Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Dewey, J. 1997. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Free Press.
Ergas, O. 2017a. Reconstructing ‘Education’ through mindful attention: Positioning the mind at the center of curriculum and pedagogy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ergas, O. 2017b. Reclaiming “self” in teachers' images of “education” through mindfulness as contemplative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy 14(3): 218–235.
Gethin, R. 1998. The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hanh, T.N. 1998. The heart of the Buddha’s teachings. New York: Broadway Books.
Hansen, D.T. 2010. Cosmopolitanism and education: A view from the ground. Teachers College Record 112(1): 1–30.
Higgins, C. 2017. What the past holds in store. Educational Theory 67(5): 537–543.
Hyland, T. 2017. McDonaldizing spirituality: Mindfulness, education, and consumerism. Journal of Transformative Education 15(4): 1–20.
Kabat-Zinn, J. 2011. Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the trouble with maps. Contemporary Buddhism 12 (1): 281–306.
Kegan, R. 1994. In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewin, D. 2017. Educational philosophy for a post-secular age. London: Routledge.
Loy, D. 1996. Lack and transcendence. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Nagel, T. 1989. The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Donnell, A. 2015. Contemplative pedagogy and mindfulness: Developing creative attention in an age of distraction. Journal of Philosophy of Education 49(2): 187–202.
Olendzki, A. 2011. The construction of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism 12(1): 55–70.
Peters, R.S. 2010. The concept of education. London: Routledge.
Pinar, W.F. 2005. The problem with curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of curriculum and pedagogy 2(1): 67–82.
Postman, N. 2011. The end of education. New York: Vintage.
Seligman, M.E., R.M. Ernst, J. Gillham, K. Reivich, and M. Linkins. 2009. Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford review of education 35 (3): 293–311.
Steel, S. 2014. The pursuit of wisdom and happiness in education. New York: SUNY Press.
Suzuki, S. 1995. Zen mind beginner’s mind. New-York: Weatherhill.
Wallace, B.A. 1999. The Buddhist tradition of Samatha: Methods for refining and examining consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(2–3): 175–187.
Yates, J., M. Immergut, and J. Graves. 2015. The mind illuminated. Arizona: Dharma Treasure Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ergas, O. Education and Time: Coming to Terms with the “Insufficiency of Now” Through Mindfulness. Stud Philos Educ 38, 113–128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09646-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09646-3